Widgets Magazine
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 130

Thread: Kerr & Couch Parks

  1. #76

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    Finally taking down the fence today.

  2. #77

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks































  3. #78

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    Kind of wonder if that pedestal in the last pic will still have the '89er monument ? My guess would be yes.

  4. #79

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    Quote Originally Posted by Bellaboo View Post
    Kind of wonder if that pedestal in the last pic will still have the '89er monument ? My guess would be yes.
    Yes, just not placed yet.

  5. Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    Sorry, looks like just more plaza space to me. Sure wish a tower could have gone here instead. ....
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  6. #81

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    what an absolute waste of money. hopefully, if and when the SD tower sells, the new owner will take over maintenance of this.

  7. #82

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    Quote Originally Posted by HOT ROD View Post
    Sorry, looks like just more plaza space to me. Sure wish a tower could have gone here instead. ....
    You didn't see the original renderings? This place will be crawling with people because it is a park, and people spontaneously generate in parks.

  8. #83

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    The middle part of that park is almost completely barren.

    Just grass and criss-crossing sidewalks.

  9. #84

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    That is so the view of three parking garages isn't obstructed.

  10. #85

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    This might work as a "passing through" park, if there were retail and food along the north side of city place (besides coolgreens) then maybe there would be a reason for someone to go to the park. Idk...if I was working in the Sandridge tower I would still walk to MBG 5 days of the week.

  11. Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    I'm not a huge fan of the design, but will say that the space really lends itself to programming. Especially considering its location in the heart of the CBD.

  12. Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    Also not a huge fan of the design. I would rather have new downtown residents, including SandRidge workers, moving into the KerMac and India Temple bldgs. This was a bad choice, plus the city will soon end up on the hook for maintenance.

    Even if you're short-sighted, that was a bad choice - tearing down a bldg with known interested housing developers, for a plaza that bleeds the public for maintenance dollars. Maybe we can rent out booths to job fairs for laid-off energy workers.

  13. #88

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    The area near the Parkside Building is nicely illuminated at night as show below.

    The eastern parts of the park -- where all the trees are -- is almost completely dark. I hope they just haven't finished the lighting in those areas.










  14. #89

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    This park is such a disappointment.

    There is zero landscape lighting at the eastern edge of the park and it doesn't look like there will ever be, even though renderings showed plenty. There is merely a large flood light along RSK pointed in that direction.

    The statute is still not placed on its podium near Robinson (first photo).

    Several trees have already died.












  15. Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    i think this is a case of too many parks.

    At some point, can we get rid of the 'couch' park and just retain the Kerr pocket park (with a 'new' redesign back to what it was)?
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  16. #91
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,697
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    I think it would have been fine, but it wasn't designed to be interacted with. Who builds a park with no benches? I think it's more a case of too much Sandridge involvement in the beginning.

  17. Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    Quote Originally Posted by HOT ROD View Post
    i think this is a case of too many parks.

    At some point, can we get rid of the 'couch' park and just retain the Kerr pocket park (with a 'new' redesign back to what it was)?
    Too bad we can't get the India Temple and KerMac bldgs back.

  18. Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    - fail -
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  19. #94

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    The "Pioneers of 1899" sculpture was reinstalled today along Robinson.

    They had to completely restore it before placing in the same general area as it has been before, but now it is more ground level instead of on a granite pedestal.

    It had been removed in 2013 as part of the park renovation.

  20. #95

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    Riflesforwatie and I walked through this park a couple of nights ago and talked about why on earth this park is there. It is poorly designed, serves no purpose, and could be way better utilized.

  21. #96

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    I'd like to see a building built on the east side of the park that and mirrors the parkside bldg but with retail/restaurant space on all 4 sides leaving a a bit of green in between the two buildings. It would block the view of the Ugly garages for the most part and could activate the space in between. I think this area could be successful once first national is renovated and we get more retail on Park as well. It would be really cool if the tiny arevest bank were a bistro or coffee shop that utilized the alley that connects couch to park. Imagine tables and chairs under string lights that would take you from Park into the cozy urban greenspace... Just a dream.

    The problem with the park as it is today is that it projects no obvious use or affordance. Theory of affordances is an idea that things need to project their uses to their user without symbolic instruction in order to be successful. For example, a tea pitcher with its bulbous body, long handle, and curved spout is obviously a vessel for storing and pouring liquid. You don't need a user manual to operate it properly or even know what it does. I don't think there were clear intentions when designing the park and when people visit they don't immediately know what to do there.

  22. #97

    Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    Just took this:


  23. Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    ? Fail. ....
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  24. Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    Guys it's history they preserved history... in writing

  25. Default Re: Kerr & Couch Parks

    huge fail
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Couch job approval
    By Spartan in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-04-2012, 10:11 AM
  2. Have any of you fatties tried the Couch to 5 K running plan?
    By Caboose in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-17-2011, 09:18 PM
  3. Couch Park update!
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-03-2007, 09:23 AM
  4. Kerr McGee spin-off Tronox to keep HQ & 300 employees in OKC
    By Pete in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-16-2006, 10:32 AM
  5. Parking discussion with Jim Couch
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-11-2004, 11:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO