Widgets Magazine
Page 158 of 217 FirstFirst ... 58108153154155156157158159160161162163208 ... LastLast
Results 3,926 to 3,950 of 5410

Thread: Convention Center

  1. #3926

    Default Re: Convention Center

    While I don't dislike it per se, the architecture is highly derivative. Still, it beats the Myriad or the State Fair Arena.

  2. #3927

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Steve's update along with an extensive interview with Adam Paulitsch, who is the project architect with Populous. He gives a lot of insight into the thought process going into the design.

    http://m.newsok.com/article/5519040

  3. #3928
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,611
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Convention Center

    IN PROCESS, INTERIOR MATERIALS IN DEVELOPMENT [STILL UPDATING]

    Looks sleek, blends in with the surrounding area structures.

    The exterior lends itself to what you see in the current design trends with many of the expanded convention centers (Anaheim, Nashville, Phoenix & San Diego) .

    Anxious to see the final designs and the completed project; especially how the convention center hotel complements the whole complex.

  4. #3929

    Default Re: Convention Center

    The best part is no signs of skybridges!

  5. #3930

    Default Re: Convention Center

    For some reason it reminds me of the Stage Center. Maybe all the boxiness.

  6. #3931

    Default Re: Convention Center

    I might be in the minority here...but I think it's super ugly and will look outdated and old really fast. The street level still feels like an afterthought here especially on the most important NW corner of the convention center. The building itself, I think, will feel really imposing when standing next to it and not at all inviting. Swing and a miss in my book.

  7. #3932
    HangryHippo Guest

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Geographer View Post
    I might be in the minority here...but I think it's super ugly and will look outdated and old really fast. The street level still feels like an afterthought here especially on the most important NW corner of the convention center. The building itself, I think, will feel really imposing when standing next to it and not at all inviting. Swing and a miss in my book.
    I agree with you about the outdated part. I think it's going to look incredibly outdated really quickly and I don't love the sharp angles. They feel like something thrown up just to throw up. I do like that it doesn't appear to be one building along the street, but it's going to lose its luster quickly.

  8. #3933
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,999
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Convention Center

    I like the contemporary design with traditional materials. I am sure there are others who like the faux old look, but I see most progressive urban areas employing pretty contemporary looks for their public buildings. I like how it isn't just a monolithic looking building. For its use, the renderings make the street level interaction look pretty good.

  9. #3934

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Brasky View Post
    I agree with you about the outdated part. I think it's going to look incredibly outdated really quickly and I don't love the sharp angles. They feel like something thrown up just to throw up. I do like that it doesn't appear to be one building along the street, but it's going to lose its luster quickly.
    100% agree about the sharp angles. That's what really turns me off about it. Overall just seems like a trendy design, and IMO trendy designs never stand the test of time.

  10. #3935

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Rover View Post
    I like the contemporary design with traditional materials. I am sure there are others who like the faux old look, but I see most progressive urban areas employing pretty contemporary looks for their public buildings. I like how it isn't just a monolithic looking building. For its use, the renderings make the street level interaction look pretty good.
    Good contemporary design and traditional materials translates to, what looks like, large concrete walls and orange tin siding. To me, it looks like the Dallas City Hall, which as you can tell by the picture below, is just bursting at the seams with street life.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DallasCityHall.JPG 
Views:	122 
Size:	87.0 KB 
ID:	13079

  11. #3936

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Geographer View Post
    Good contemporary design and traditional materials translates to, what looks like, large concrete walls and orange tin siding. To me, it looks like the Dallas City Hall, which as you can tell by the picture below, is just bursting at the seams with street life.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DallasCityHall.JPG 
Views:	122 
Size:	87.0 KB 
ID:	13079
    That reminds of launch command at KSC.

  12. #3937

    Default Re: Convention Center

    When I first started reading comments after the latest renderings, I thought it was sarcasm about the design looking dated. Now after another handful of posts saying similar things, I am blown away that there are people thinking this is a poor design.

    This will easily be one of the most modern structures downtown.

    Guess some of you really wanted the spilled crayon box design from MAPs.


  13. #3938

    Default Re: Convention Center

    I do agree it has the potential to look dated -- but really there are very few architectural styles that remain compatible with future architectural trends. There will be a time Devon, BOK Park Building, and the Sandridge building will look very out of style. It is modern day architecture and is unlikely those will also remain at the forefront of architecture style.

    The good thing is, exterior design can be relatively easily modified in future years. A good example is the airport -- it's still the same 1970's main terminal building underneath the glass and stone facade and modern interior design and finishes.

  14. #3939
    HangryHippo Guest

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous. View Post
    When I first started reading comments after the latest renderings, I thought it was sarcasm about the design looking dated. Now after another handful of posts saying similar things, I am blown away that there are people thinking this is a poor design.

    This will easily be one of the most modern structures downtown.

    Guess some of you really wanted the spilled crayon box design from MAPs.

    Thinking back to some of the original MAPs renderings, do you recall the Rose Rock design? I remember that particular idea looking good. I can't find the rendering I remember to share with you though...

  15. #3940

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous. View Post
    When I first started reading comments after the latest renderings, I thought it was sarcasm about the design looking dated. Now after another handful of posts saying similar things, I am blown away that there are people thinking this is a poor design.

    This will easily be one of the most modern structures downtown.

    Guess some of you really wanted the spilled crayon box design from MAPs.

    See, to me this is exactly where the problem lays. Modern for the sake of modern doesn't necessarily equal good design.

  16. #3941

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by catch22 View Post
    I do agree it has the potential to look dated -- but really there are very few architectural styles that remain compatible with future architectural trends. There will be a time Devon, BOK Park Building, and the Sandridge building will look very out of style. It is modern day architecture and is unlikely those will also remain at the forefront of architecture style.

    The good thing is, exterior design can be relatively easily modified in future years. A good example is the airport -- it's still the same 1970's main terminal building underneath the glass and stone facade and modern interior design and finishes.
    The clean look of the Devon tower is exactly why, IMO, I think it will look good for many more decades than the convention center design.

    A lot of this is taste. I'm more of a simple guy. I like a clean, sleek look. I don't mind modern, if it's done right. The convention center has a much more complex, over-bearing design IMO.

  17. #3942
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,697
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Convention Center

    I do think they need to move the signage that reads "Oklahoma City Convention Center" so that it faces "Oklahoma City Boulevard". Wouldn't want people getting lost.

  18. #3943

    Default Re: Convention Center

    What do you want exactly? Modern and futuristic is what is trendy (and likely will be for a long time). Otherwise we are just rebuilding the CCC with a glass facade, how boring.

    Your realistic options are either the style most recently rendered, or the same style with curved elements instead:


  19. #3944

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Brasky View Post
    Thinking back to some of the original MAPs renderings, do you recall the Rose Rock design? I remember that particular idea looking good. I can't find the rendering I remember to share with you though...
    Here it is:

  20. #3945

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Zuplar View Post
    See, to me this is exactly where the problem lays. Modern for the sake of modern doesn't necessarily equal good design.
    Exactly. Modern does not equal good design.

  21. #3946
    HangryHippo Guest

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by KayneMo View Post
    Here it is:
    Thanks KayneMo!

  22. #3947

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous. View Post
    What do you want exactly? Modern and futuristic is what is trendy (and likely will be for a long time). Otherwise we are just rebuilding the CCC with a glass facade, how boring.

    Your realistic options are either the style most recently rendered, or the same style with curved elements instead:

    Honestly, I like this better. Ties more into the styling of the Boathouses. I'm sure I could search around and find something that in my opinion would be better, but I have a sneaking suspicion it would be considered boring.

  23. #3948

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous. View Post
    When I first started reading comments after the latest renderings, I thought it was sarcasm about the design looking dated. Now after another handful of posts saying similar things, I am blown away that there are people thinking this is a poor design.

    This will easily be one of the most modern structures downtown.

    Guess some of you really wanted the spilled crayon box design from MAPs.

    This looks like an airport drop off lane.

  24. Default Re: Convention Center

    Not to go against the grain, but I like it. I think with these projects you make the exterior something showy, and the interior should be timeless and basic or else it will be outdated in 5 years.

    What I see here is not bad per se. It's not the rose rock design floated in the election, but we had to know something as amazing as that just isn't possible within this budget.

    I still wish that eastern park-side wasn't just ALL convention center. It wouldn't involve much to screen the surface parking lot with a small outparcel building and then the expansion phase can just drop back behind that. That will save money on design, make money on selling the land or rents generated, and that's just if the city doesn't even care about the design/vitality of a large civic building on the park (which I don't think they do).

    I think actually the best small "outparcel" could be a small boutique hotel with narrow floor plates. Solves the challenge of who would want to "reside" in a convention center and gets some mixed-use and after-five action on that east side, which I can't stress the importance of enough.

  25. #3950
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,611
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Geographer View Post
    Good contemporary design and traditional materials translates to, what looks like, large concrete walls and orange tin siding. To me, it looks like the Dallas City Hall, which as you can tell by the picture below, is just bursting at the seams with street life.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DallasCityHall.JPG 
Views:	122 
Size:	87.0 KB 
ID:	13079

    Similar to the OU Asthma & Allergy Clinic at OUHSC

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)
    By G.Walker in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 1332
    Last Post: 11-18-2024, 09:29 PM
  2. Skirvin Expansion / Convention Center Hotel (dead)
    By Doug Loudenback in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 205
    Last Post: 04-12-2011, 02:13 PM
  3. Replies: 105
    Last Post: 08-05-2010, 01:54 PM
  4. Bricktown Central Plaza Hotel & Convention Center....
    By BricktownGuy in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-12-2006, 05:57 PM
  5. Does TULSA'S One Willams Center look like the World Trade Center?
    By thecains in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-07-2005, 02:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO