Right!? I mean, this is the only time this has ever happened in OKC so there's no reason to be concerned about the city's processes.
I guess concerned citizens that would like to see some of OKC's history preserved should consider the current debacle in isolation and ignore the fact it's a repeated failure of city leadership. Thanks David.
Not at all. It's just a pragmatic look at the situation in the context of the city's history of demolition for unfunded projects. We could just ignore it and not change anything, but that's exactly why this happened, right? I'm not sure why it bothers you that some are just trying to get a positive change as a result of the situation. It would never have affected any of the projects that have been built, just the ones like this one where they didn't even have the means to complete the project when the permits were given.
So, it's not as much "sky is falling", as it is trying to avoid the pitfalls of a Pollyanna approach.
Not peachy. Just not near as comically dire as half the people here are making it out to be. I think you and some others here are being far, far too pessimistic.
At any rate, taking a "sky is falling" approach, complaining about the situation on a message board and actually doing something constructive are two completely different things. There is very little constructive thought being provided here, though some, like BDP, are actually taking a level headed approach to their annoyance with the situation.
I just think, just like I always thought, that it sucks that people allowed the destruction of the Stage Center, for what was not a sure thing at the time, and has been proven to not have been a sure thing. If nothing else, the Stage Center was a world class piece of public art. We've replaced it with a fenced in mud puddle. Now I'm waiting for some slapdash asphalt and a "Pay to Park" sign next. I have no idea if things are as bad as some people say or as hopeful as others think. I think we were stupid to listen to a young pup with no experience (or money) behind him. We do not seem to learn from our mistakes either.
The problem is that any time anything is demolished, there is never any guarantee after that.
Even if you have building permits and financing lined up, projects come off the rails for all sorts of reasons.
So, I think it's a waste of energy to think in terms of trading something for something else. What we are always doing is determining if something is worth saving or not regardless of what may or may not replace it.
Are some of you guys not reading the same thread full of doomsaying that I am? Sure, not all of you are taking the approach that I am criticizing (aka, the "move to Houston" idea), but enough have been that it is deeply annoying. For example, the comment immediately before mine:
We're lucky that BOK Park Plaza is moving forward? It is a completely different development and a completely different scenario, luck had nothing to do with it.
Correct, but it could minimize the risk of this happening. Had such a policy been in place, requiring a building permit tied to demolition, Stage Center would still be standing.
There always will be the one-off chance that financing could fall through after demolition and a building permit has been issued. It happens in cities all across the country. But its a lot more rare that a deal makes it that far and then collapses.
Whether or not something is worth saving, in this city it all depends on whether or not the big boys with the money think its worth saving. If Larry Nichols wants something gone, it will be gone.
They could have easily obtained a building permit if that had been a condition... They had already received design approval and spent a ton of money on architects and engineers.
It's a silly idea that needs to be dropped. It's not going to happen and wouldn't make a difference if it did.
So I guess its time to simply write this off as an "oops!" and cross fingers hoping the same thing doesn't happen again in a few years when somebody with money comes in with big promises, wanting to tear down something that will likely be more beloved and less polarizing than Stage Center.
Many of the buildings that were demolished would have eventually met that fate anyway. It's probably a lot less expensive to have the parcels cleared and available for development than to wait on something down the road.
You mean like the Skirvin, Marion, Ambassador Hotel, Fred Jones Assembly, Tower Theatre, Colcord, soon to be First National Center, etc, etc? As long as something is still standing, no matter how dire the situation seems, there is always a chance for renovation and restoration.
I thought I would post this here as it pertains. Look at what was destroyed to build the Stage Center.
![]()
Okay, I'm going to make a respectful suggestion on this thread - one I will promise to abide myself (no clean hands here) - let's *NOT* turn this thread into ten pages of remorse (or, in my case, rejoicing) about the loss of the Stage Center. It's gone, bad or good, loved or hated, useful or not, it's gone, gone forever, and right now the constructive discussion has to focus on what can happen with the properties going forward. If folks want to lament, celebrate, or argue the SC all over again, that's fine, but let's do it in a different thread.
Sorry about my negative post. I am not done with hoping this city gets better... I was just super disappointed when I typed that. I believe OKC is changing and for the better, it is just disappointing to see how things are handled here sometimes.
Quite honestly, I'm not so much as disappointed that this happen as I am on how this thing was handled. I think these buildings belong on NW Expressway or Broadway Ext. I didn't think they were the best fit in regards to how urbanism should be in our downtown and I ultimately believe we will get something better on this site.
I also am excited because I really love that little castle looking tower on the south end of the Stage Center lot and think that could make a really cool housing thing for 4-5 units.
This thing coupled with the Ford Center and ultimately the Cox Convention site will become and awesome part of downtown.
I think that's fine, but I don't think any constructive or destructive discussion here will have a twit worth of influence on what ultimately happens. I did everything I knew to do to keep the Stage Center from being demolished and I failed. I have no earthly idea what I could do to make sure that piece of property becomes something that doesn't continue my regret since I do not have the money to buy it and develop it. Forums are a place to applaud or complain. It's quite clear after what Sandridge did and what Rainey Williams did that we, and very few other people, have any power to effect change short of becoming developers or becoming rich and powerful enough to put pressure on the city that they cannot ignore.
Empty Stage Center > Lake Lackmeyer
Truthfully, we need public accountability. That means calling people out and making powerful, wealthy people uncomfortable.
Rainey Willaims needs someone to stick a camera in his face and say "why'd you eff this up, and don't give me that 'falling oil prices' excuse. Why did you tear down Stage Center if you knew you were going to need XYZ dollars of public financing?" Somebody needs to be at his house, today, asking where his 'world class' development is. Asking if he ever had any real plan to see this through. Asking if he was just a front man for OG&E so they could tear down Stage Center without public scrutiny. He needs to be ambushed at his front door by a TV camera crew, and when it's over he needs to be pissed. We need someone to ask OG&E execs those questions too.
We need people who have a public voice, who are willing to make people mad.
I honestly could not agree more! In general, the media in this city is way too soft on things like this.
Agreed, hoya. There needs to be serious accountability.
Agreed. I was hoping it would start with Steve but he seems more interested in blaming the price of oil. Those that follow him on twitter will know this but a road construction project up on the north side that was seriously over its completed time he complained about everyday for months. He called for accountability from the contractor and the city and did it everyday and frankly I wish he would put that much effort into calling out Rainey Williams and OG&E. When Villa Terresa was about to sell he wrote multiple articles and threatened people on twitter to release more information about the group buying it and their plans to tear it all down. Again, I wish he would put that much effort into holding these people accountable for their blatant lies. Just as Preftakes promised he wouldn't tear down the bus station to Steve and Steve defended him till the very end when demolition permits were filed. He will befriend anyone to get a story and a future scoop. His article today was all OG&E's side of the story of they are really doing a service for the city by waiting to build this right instead of asking the hard questions of why if this was fully funded to begin with did it not get built with or without TIF. I don't want this to be taken as a bashing of Steve because I feel he does write great stories and provides a great service of loving OKC and writing about downtown but where is his passion to call out people here that he does on all sorts of other projects. And with the Oklahoman being own by Phillip Anschutz, a Energy tycoon, I can't help but wonder if this "everything is the price of oil's fault" rhetoric is somehow related to his ownership.
"Because it was my land, and I can do what I want with it. I applied and received all demolition permits legally. Sorry the towers didn't get built. I couldn't make the money I wanted to make off the towers and I'm for damn sure not going to lose money to make people happy, that's what government is for. I don't owe the taxpayers, you or anyone else jack. Once again it was my land, and the city let me tear down SC so either take it up with them or outbid me and buy it for yourself next time."
That's about the answer you'd receive. Welcome to America and these things called private property rights.
There are currently 77 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 77 guests)
Bookmarks