Widgets Magazine
Page 68 of 109 FirstFirst ... 186364656667686970717273 ... LastLast
Results 1,676 to 1,700 of 2713

Thread: OG&E Energy Center

  1. #1676

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by hoyasooner View Post
    I'd anticipate that we won't hear anything until the convention center issue is decided. Remember that now they're considering the south parcel as a site for the convention hotel, and it's the expected choice. That really alters ClayCo's position as far as the 4 theoretical towers go. My guess is they try to resolve all of that with one big deal.
    True, but I thought the north parcel was happening independent of the south parcel?

  2. #1677

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
    True, but I thought the north parcel was happening independent of the south parcel?
    Yeah but I bet this still affects TIF negotiations.

  3. Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    I won't hold your breath to see too much in the way of TIF for the Clayco project, just because they will be under pressure to get the CC project as much additional funding as possible. A deal with both Clayco and REHCO is just a creative vehicle for doing so.

  4. #1679

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    I'd guess that they're going to try to work out one deal that wraps up all of it together. That's at least what I'd do.

    Imagine something like this:

    North site:
    OG&E tower with a small TIF award
    Residential tower with a larger TIF
    ClayCo parking garage #1

    South site:
    ClayCo/convention center/convention hotel parking garage #2
    ClayCo/Omni Convention Hotel tower mirroring the OG&E design with substantial TIF award (instead of office tower #2)
    Possible Future Residential tower #2 if/when/maybe

    The whole project would be taken care of in one big stroke.

  5. #1680

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    I think this is very much a case of the powers that be wanting as much TIF money as possible for the convention hotel and parking structure and also trying to figure out how to integrate the hotel with the Clayco development to the north.

    I'm still 98% sure the CC and the hotel will go on the REHCO / south Clayco sites.

  6. #1681

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    How likely would it be for the hotel to go on the south Clayco site and use the OG&E tower matching design?

  7. #1682

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    South ClayCo site -- very likely.
    OG&E tower design -- just my suggestion.

  8. #1683

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Do we have any type of timeline at all as to when we can expect some noise from this project?

    It's clear everyone believes (or knows) that all parties are waiting on the CC confirmation, but when is that expected?

    This thing is dragging out, and I noticed a nice little pond on the site.

  9. #1684

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    I think they'll make a decision on the convention center within 30 days, and I'm also sure the convention hotel will be going on the south half of this block.

  10. #1685

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Pete, is there still hope that the OG&E Headquarters tower will be built by Clayco?

  11. #1686

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Yes, I think Clayco is trying to figure out how to do this with little or no TIF funds, as the City seems to be holding firm in not wanting to give them anywhere near what they have requested.

  12. #1687

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Interesting. I wonder if they are considering condensing the scope into ONLY one or two towers, combining the HQ with residential, or residential with the hotel, etc.?

  13. #1688

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by TU 'cane View Post
    Interesting. I wonder if they are considering condensing the scope into ONLY one or two towers, combining the HQ with residential, or residential with the hotel, etc.?
    I'm not sure if this is true or not, but spoke to a friend that works for OG&E and he said they want to build a 17 story tower and the city wants it to be as originally proposed.

    I hope that we will not have to prepare ourselves for disappointment.

    I was not a fan of Stage Center, but having it demolished and a empty lot sitting in the heart of the city is unacceptable.

  14. #1689
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,944
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by gsan View Post
    I'm not sure if this is true or not, but spoke to a friend that works for OG&E and he said they want to build a 17 story tower and the city wants it to be as originally proposed.

    I hope that we will not have to prepare ourselves for disappointment.

    I was not a fan of Stage Center, but having it demolished and a empty lot sitting in the heart of the city is unacceptable.
    vs.
    So, OG&E wants to go back to this?

  15. #1690

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Oh, boy. So with that it would seem it would go back to the original proposal.

    I think we would all much rather see a tower with the design of the current proposal. One would think they could pull off that 25 story model and combine what they were originally planning. But, then again, that's why I'm not in any of these professions.

  16. #1691
    SouthsideSooner Guest

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Steve had these comments in his chat yesterday...

    "Steve Lackmeyer
    ‎11‎:‎12‎:‎35‎ ‎AM
    When this project began, Rainey Williams Jr. came in with a respectable track record at BOK Plaza and other real estate ventures and OGE Energy Corp seemed like a strong enough anchor to make this project a go. But reaction to the initial development, a mid-rise building, was far from enthusiastic. So Williams then teamed up with Clayco, which proposed a far more impressive development with four towers, 25- and 26-stories each with a mix of offices, housing and retail. But with that came the tax increment financing proposal which was met with a lot of push back at City Hall. Clayco is not at the negotiating table and it doesn't appear as if much progress is being made between the city and OGE Energy Corp., which took over Clayco's role in the discussions."

    "Here's my honest thought at this moment: I really wonder if the city shouldn't try to buy the Stage Center site and make it the location for the new convention center."

    OKC Central Chat transcript, Aug. 7, 2015 | News OK

  17. #1692
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,477
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by gsan View Post
    ... having it demolished and a empty lot sitting in the heart of the city is unacceptable.
    Hopefully, that's not happening across the street, too. Vacancies are just now starting to tick up again.

    Rinse and repeat...

  18. #1693

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by SouthsideSooner View Post
    Steve had these comments in his chat yesterday...

    "Steve Lackmeyer
    ‎11‎:‎12‎:‎35‎ ‎AM
    When this project began, Rainey Williams Jr. came in with a respectable track record at BOK Plaza and other real estate ventures and OGE Energy Corp seemed like a strong enough anchor to make this project a go. But reaction to the initial development, a mid-rise building, was far from enthusiastic. So Williams then teamed up with Clayco, which proposed a far more impressive development with four towers, 25- and 26-stories each with a mix of offices, housing and retail. But with that came the tax increment financing proposal which was met with a lot of push back at City Hall. Clayco is not at the negotiating table and it doesn't appear as if much progress is being made between the city and OGE Energy Corp., which took over Clayco's role in the discussions."

    "Here's my honest thought at this moment: I really wonder if the city shouldn't try to buy the Stage Center site and make it the location for the new convention center."

    OKC Central Chat transcript, Aug. 7, 2015 | News OK
    Wow.

    And here, I believe many of this thought this project was in the bag, despite TIF concerns.
    Now, we have SC gone for what is cooking up to be no reason (oh, the irony of it all), and in place for months a shallow pond with fence around it.

    We have two issues here:

    1. Private developers relying too heavily on the presumption that TIF requests will be received regardless.
    2. City code and leaders allowing demolition to commence without any type of accountability.

    Yes, I realize this is essentially the conversation we have had over the last six months, but dang. Talk about hitting you right in the mouth.
    This was my favorite project out of all the recent ones, finished and proposed. I would still be fine if they decided to scratch buildings 2-4 and stuck with the initial 25 story tower to house ONG, and maybe try to mix in their other plans.

    I hate to sound so gloomy, but with each passing day from my perspective, this project is losing its grip.

  19. #1694
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,944
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by TU 'cane View Post
    Wow.

    And here, I believe many of this thought this project was in the bag, despite TIF concerns.
    Now, we have SC gone for what is cooking up to be no reason (oh, the irony of it all), and in place for months a shallow pond with fence around it.

    We have two issues here:

    1. Private developers relying too heavily on the presumption that TIF requests will be received regardless.
    2. City code and leaders allowing demolition to commence without any type of accountability.

    Yes, I realize this is essentially the conversation we have had over the last six months, but dang. Talk about hitting you right in the mouth.
    This was my favorite project out of all the recent ones, finished and proposed. I would still be fine if they decided to scratch buildings 2-4 and stuck with the initial 25 story tower to house ONG, and maybe try to mix in their other plans.

    I hate to sound so gloomy, but with each passing day from my perspective, this project is losing its grip.
    The 499 Sheridan tower project (Devon/Hines) has received much criticism for its design. Let's count our blessings.

  20. #1695

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Are we ready to say Rainey made a mistake choosing Clayco for this project.

  21. #1696

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    [bchris]This ALWAYS happens in Oklahoma City[/bchris]

    Sigh.... You are right, Bchris.

  22. #1697
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,154
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    I am not endorsing how this deal has been done. However, I think most on here are totally un-knowledgable about what it takes to get major development deals done. There are many, many moving parts. I think everybody thinks you just make up a plan and execute it. I am involved in one much simpler than this in a city in Texas. If I recounted to everyone all the different barriers and changes we have had to navigate they wouldn't believe it. Nor would they believe the costs. We have had banks back out at closing time. We have had permits delayed for months for unjustified reasons. We have discovered utilities on the site that the city swore weren't there and we didn't have others in places they were sure were there. We have had review committees make changes after plans were approved. Delays caused by others have caused some who signed leases to back out. And on, and on. We have spent a lot of wasted time and money. And this is something the client and city are committed to do, and the neighbors want it to happen. Imagine if there was dissension or opposition. I understand if Clayco is standing back and waiting for things to clear before getting too excited about doing it. People want to imagine these developers as robber barons but have no clue what they have to go through and the risk they take.

    While we want grand skyscrapers of premium quality and can imagine this grand new utopia, developers have to look at it in a much more unemotional and with more pragmatic sense...or they will soon be out of business.

  23. #1698

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Peace out Rover - Yet another thread I can no longer post in.

  24. #1699
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,154
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    That was childish the first time, let alone the 10th time. Go to the corner and hold your breath til you pass out. Believe it or not, every thread isn't about JTF. Hard to imagine.

  25. #1700

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by rover View Post
    that was childish the first time, let alone the 10th time. Go to the corner and hold your breath til you pass out. Believe it or not, every thread isn't about jtf. Hard to imagine.
    bravo!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 87 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 87 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Devon Energy Center
    By Steve in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 12201
    Last Post: 12-29-2024, 06:16 PM
  2. Gulfport Energy
    By ljbab728 in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 133
    Last Post: 12-08-2021, 08:16 AM
  3. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-23-2014, 07:44 AM
  4. Connect the Ford Center and Cox Center
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-06-2005, 11:04 PM
  5. Does TULSA'S One Willams Center look like the World Trade Center?
    By thecains in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-07-2005, 02:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO