I told them at first I thought I was too young for cataracts but they assured me I wasn't. Asked if the glare at night bothered me and I told them I couldn't recall the last time I had to drive at night. But in my eye exam I had to shade my eye because of glare just to see the chart.
That Toric lens was $1200 extra per eye btw.
At least those clunky looking sun glasses are actually pretty good.
This typically happens to me, when I'm writing out a big lengthy longwinded explanation. It seems to time out. So, if it takes me greater than 8-10 minutes to make the reply/post...it will time me out.... and then asks me to log back in, before being able to reply/post.
Do you select the "remember me" checkbox next to your login?
Flintysooner,
I was 49 in August, 1993 and 50 in February, 1994 when I had my surgery, and that is fairly young. It has a lot to do with how you treat your eyes. I don't wear sun glasses, never have and at this point, never will but that was why I had cataracts so early.
C. T.
There is a lens recently approved that helps do away with the need for reading glasses. It's called KARMA (which is an acronym for something). Clearsight has been running ads for it. I first read about it in a magazine at my Dr's office a few months ago. I'm really thinking about doing it after they've been out a while.
Great advice here. I go to Dean McGee and have been thinking about this for several years. Contacts add up in cost quickly.
I offer a cautionary tale...
I had lasik done some time ago by one of the very top people in L.A.; head of ophthalmology at USC.
I was only near-sighted and didn't have to wear glasses or contacts, but it was getting to the point where I really should.
Up until the surgery, I had never had any sort of issues with my eyes. Afterwards, my eyes were chronically dry and remain so to this day. Also, I am extremely sensitive to the sunlight now, to the point of wearing sunglasses any time I am outside. I also have eye allergies which I never had before.
After about 10 years, I had to get glasses anyway. My eyes are now far too dry for contacts and I am once again pretty near sighted and with age I can't read anything without reading glasses.
Although virtually everyone over 50 needs reading glasses, I was warned lasik would likely accelerate that process and/or make it more severe.
I really regret the whole decision. I'm sure the procedure has improved, but keep in mind the effects are only short term and there can be a downside, especially after 10 years or so.
Plus or minus, I have not used any of these technologies, but a friend of mine now works in this office in NYC, she did work here in OkC before moving to NYC for this fellowship. Interesting claims:
Meet our team | Park Avenue SafeSight?- NY's only NO-FLAP ALL-LASER VISION CORRECTIONS -- SafeSight?
Pete, your experience sounds much like mine. I was warned, too, about the need for readers. In my case, my eyes were so nearsighted before the surgery, readers or not, i absolutely love the results. I dont need glasses for active things or driving. I just have to have my glasses near.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks