Huh? One North Hudson was Class A office space not long ago. Full of law firms. The Motor Hotel was also operating as a parking garage in my lifetime (I'm not very old for those who don't know).
This is about doing the cheapest possible development on this site. Devon is feeling the hurt from low oil prices just like everyone else.
Yes, yes I did. Much like Architect said, I just don't feel like this place qualifies for the things so many people want it to. Look at how it's built. it's a building surrounded by parking lot on all sides. It's very small, and as far as being an "example of a style", I don't buy into that. That's just my opinion, but there it is. For me, the parking garage is part of a larger development project and I'm willing to let this blasé building go to make room for something else. I'd rather be able to keep one north Hudson and the motor hotel, but there seems to be less fight on those than this crappy little 1 story waiting room (which is what it is).
What I meant by the lost chance is that if republic failed a year or two from now, would we have lost the opportunity for a new development to come into the area because the real estate possibilities have changed. Timing can be everything on the financial side. Waiting to see if a restaurant rehab of a building MIGHT (and let's not stretch too much by giving it a pass since others in the VERY near area don't just do hot) work isn't a gamble I'm personally willing to take.
So yes, for me i'll hop in the bulldozer and run the place over myself....even if it's a parking garage.
Makes me think of apple pie. And cigarettes.
That was done in 2011.
Did Nick pay you for that work? If so (or even if not), do you think it was appropriate to release it here?
What's interesting is the plans show the Lunch Box building demolished with only the sign remaining.
What was the point of that anyway? Just to dress up a surface lot? Seems like a lot of wasted work for the space....especially knowing he wanted to take out the whole block.
Is the objective to save the bus station, or to stop 499?
Restaurants of the Year: 2015 Winners | Food & Wine
thegreyrestaurant.com
Savannah is also microscopic compared to OKC. It's a lot easier to push walkability when you aren't spread out across 1K miles.
Comparing OKC to Savannah in any way, shape or form is ridiculous. Savannah's very culture is based on humanistic planning; Oglethorpe's squares are nearly 300 years old. When we decided in the 50s to start gutting our downtown of historic structures, at the same time Savannah was embarking on an aggressive plan to preserve theirs.
They have a prominent university downtown dedicated to the arts - including the building arts - and when SCAD needs more space instead of building new they take a historic structure and renovate it. The entire downtown acts as a college campus, with SCAD buildings spread randomly throughout and students and faculty walking between them. It's an apples-to-bicycles comparison.
I don't think size of the city, be it population or actual city limits, is the predominant factor. Walkability and urbanity is determined primarily by how a city was built and how much of its original building stock has been preserved. Unfortunately for OKC most of the old city was destroyed. If OKC still had its building stock that it had in the 1950s, it would be a very, very different place today.
Savannah, like Charleston, is a 300+ year old city mostly still intact today.
In all fairness, a history that is 400 years old vs. a pioneer history of barely 100 makes a huge difference in sense of preservation of history. Harbor, three rivers and natural beauty also help. Comparing Charleston to OKC is silly.
Savannah's historic district, i.e., the walkable part, is 2 square miles. Very comparable in size to the area of OKC where walkability matters. I don't think anyone is suggesting that OKC can make 600 square miles walkable, but making walkability a priority in .0034 % of that shouldn't be all that difficult.
Savannah and OKC were settled very differently and thus can't be directly compared, but that doesn't change that one city preserved its history and the other destroyed it. Imagine OKC today if the old city would have been preserved.
![]()
I really don't think anyone is suggesting that OKC be savannah. That would actually take a complete do over (and a time machine)
However, there is one important takeaway from Savannah that just about any city can learn from: Planning. Savannah is often referred to as America's first planned city. Whether the "first" part of it is true or not, it was Savannah's structured plan that made that part of the city worth preserving in the first place. We really have no plan, or, at least, we are unwilling to enforce it.
There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 12 guests)
Bookmarks