Widgets Magazine
Page 44 of 136 FirstFirst ... 394041424344454647484994 ... LastLast
Results 1,076 to 1,100 of 3386

Thread: BOK Park Plaza

  1. #1076

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Urbanized. I think you misread his post.
    he was saying the sieber being what it is.. it pains him to see the Motor Hotel on this site be demolished when it could be another Sieber.

  2. Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Ahh...could be. Would make sense.

  3. #1078

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by Bullbear View Post
    Urbanized. I think you misread his post.
    he was saying the sieber being what it is.. it pains him to see the Motor Hotel on this site be demolished when it could be another Sieber.

    Sorry Urbanized, this is what I meant. The Seiber is awesome and I would love to see the Motor Hotel repurposed like the Seiber has been. Sorry for the confusion.

  4. Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by bombermwc View Post
    Just adding that the building discussed above has got to win one of the worst design awards of all time. That is AWFUL to the millionth degree. Much like so many disgusting "modern" designs, it's as if the more we mismatch a design with pieces that don't fit together, the more people think they're great designs. This is the type of crap that is going to be the first to go when we look at what to keep as historical preservation in 100 years. SH&T!!!
    I don't know about this, what kind of architecture do you approve of?

  5. #1080

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    My initial reaction was that it is far too busy with too many elements, but I notice it somewhat similar to a building in San Diego, so I think the actual building will look far better than the drawing.

  6. Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    I don't think it will get passed either way. Too tall apparently. I just learned of a similar proposal that the same Area Commission rejected and forced to downsize:



    This was built instead (parking garage in the back is lined with skinny townhomes):

  7. Default Re: 499 Sheridan



    I just came across this photo of West Main in 1957. Can you believe this used to be Main Street? Every single thing in the above picture is demolished. Soon the 420 W Main Building will be the only remaining historic structure on OKC's Main Street.

    This is one of the most incredible urban renewal transformations.


  8. #1084

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post

    I just came across this photo of West Main in 1957. Can you believe this used to be Main Street? Every single thing in the above picture is demolished. Soon the 420 W Main Building will be the only remaining historic structure on OKC's Main Street.

    This is one of the most incredible urban renewal transformations.
    I wouldn't call that a positive transformation either. It's amazing what OKC used to be and what it could still be if TPTB had a little more foresight.

  9. #1085

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    To see that picture and compare to now is painful. What a disastrous implementation of supposed renewal

  10. #1086

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    I honestly don't even know what I'm looking at when I see that picture. I can't place orientation at all. If that was still on OKC I don't think there is any doubt it would be the most vibrant place in the entire city.

  11. #1087

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Double post, please delete

  12. Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post


    I just came across this photo of West Main in 1957. Can you believe this used to be Main Street? Every single thing in the above picture is demolished. Soon the 420 W Main Building will be the only remaining historic structure on OKC's Main Street.

    This is one of the most incredible urban renewal transformations.
    This is the StreetView location. The Oil & Gas building on the right is the only existing structure besides the Hightower way off in the distance. You can barely see the 420 S Main building also.

    https://www.google.com/maps/@35.4676...2wVw!2e0?hl=en

  13. Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    I could post and compare this whole intersection of Main and Robinson looking north, south, east, and west but it would take this way off topic. Just click the Twitter links in the previous page.

  14. Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Back on topic, I heard your typical rumor from someone who heard from a person "in the know" that this building would end up being 32 stories instead of 27. Is there any credibility to this that anyone knows?

  15. #1091

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by UnFrSaKn View Post
    Back on topic, I heard your typical rumor from someone who heard from a person "in the know" that this building would end up being 32 stories instead of 27. Is there any credibility to this that anyone knows?
    Hopefully that is true. A more impactful building would make the loss of these historic structures easier to swallow.

  16. #1092

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Maybe they've decided to build this building on top of the parking ?

  17. #1093

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    This is one of the most incredible urban renewal transformations.
    It's odd. In the '60s and '70s, the term urban renewal had a positive conotation and sounded like a hopeful, new outlook. Now days urban renewal is a dirty word. I guess they never would've guessed that future generations would long for the urban history that met its demise with the wrekcing ball.

  18. #1094

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by Bellaboo View Post
    Maybe they've decided to build this building on top of the parking ?
    One can only hope.

  19. #1095

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by UnFrSaKn View Post
    This is the StreetView location. The Oil & Gas building on the right is the only existing structure besides the Hightower way off in the distance. You can barely see the 420 S Main building also.

    https://www.google.com/maps/@35.4676...2wVw!2e0?hl=en

    I am trying to place the Oil and Gas Building. Where is it and what is it now? Thanks

  20. Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    This building, on the right side in the original StreetView link.

    http://bit.ly/1HmEEzr

    This is what it looked like originally.

    http://bit.ly/1K96amS

  21. Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by traxx View Post
    It's odd. In the '60s and '70s, the term urban renewal had a positive conotation and sounded like a hopeful, new outlook. Now days urban renewal is a dirty word. I guess they never would've guessed that future generations would long for the urban history that met its demise with the wrekcing ball.
    Just to build on what you said, I don't think it was any one generation that had different values or something like that. People are people. I think that generally there is reverence for older history, but we always disregard more modern history like that of our parents. Cities are very cyclical.

    OKC does legitimately have a higher disregard for urban history compared to most other cities, but every city has a few that have to come down on rare occasions. The difference with OKC is that we don't have a few..we have a few every year. We aren't demo'ing 2000 structures like early OCURA did, but that's largely because we don't have that much left.

    OKC is at a fork where it can either hold tightly onto everything it has left, and end up making the most out of its opportunities, or it can say screw it and just take out the rest because we had might as well. It's one thing for the replacement to pale in comparison to the original we demolished, but it's another thing when we completely demolish the opportunity to build onto the city we already had.

    The problem when you are recklessly unsophisticated in your ways is that you lack the ability to express yourself in terms of "Yes and..." This manifests itself in people's actions, the way that the city debates these issues, the way the city sees itself, and the real estate projects local developers deliver. You don't have to choose between this or that; this person's worth, or that person's worth; the past, or the future; traditional marriage, or gay marriage; this mode of transit, or that mode; and so on...

    Just to be clear, I'm not calling OKC, OKC Talk, or you the reader unsophisticated, so calm down. I'm just saying that I feel as if OKC's demo behavior stems from a cultural trait that is prevalent in OKC. It exists in other cities, but manifests itself differently. OKC has evolved on transit, for instance, leaving some cities behind. I wish it would evolve on historic preservation. There is wrong and right to this issue, it isn't "a conundrum."

  22. #1098

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by UnFrSaKn View Post
    This building, on the right side in the original StreetView link.

    http://bit.ly/1HmEEzr

    This is what it looked like originally.

    http://bit.ly/1K96amS
    Never would have figured that one out. Thanks. Anybody know if was rebricked or just painted? I see they added arches to bottom window also.

  23. #1099

    Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeepnokc View Post
    Never would have figured that one out. Thanks. Anybody know if was rebricked or just painted? I see they added arches to bottom window also.
    I'm pretty sure this little building got an overhaul in the oil boom of the early eighties.

  24. Default Re: 499 Sheridan

    It did. This is one of the reasons that I am constantly harping in the need to do good HP, for instance retaining historic windows, or correct treatment of brick, ghost signs, etc.

    What happens is that someone comes in and wants to do a renovation that brings a building "up to current standards," when what they really mean is that they want to disguise the fact that it is an old building. Once that is done, the building has lost so much historic integrity that when someone comes along 20 years later and wants to tear it down, there is no grounds to protect it based on intact history. "Well, the building has been altered so much that it's not really historic anymore...", and then BAM. Demolished.

    Much better for an old building to be upgraded in a way that doesn't harm its overall historic character.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 275 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 275 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 4 E. Sheridan
    By Pete in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 05-05-2016, 08:56 AM
  2. 800 W. Sheridan
    By Pete in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 05-25-2015, 09:01 AM
  3. 712 W Sheridan
    By Pete in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-02-2014, 01:02 PM
  4. 624 W. Sheridan
    By Pete in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-05-2014, 05:01 PM
  5. 611 W Sheridan
    By warreng88 in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-26-2009, 09:00 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO