Re: Southwest adding NON-STOP to Washington (Baltimore)
^^, hopefully both United and Southwest can co-exist in the DC area-OKC market. IM SURE the seats will sell!!
There should be enough for both airlines to survive, and probably for United to add a mainliner like an A319 once the news gets the demand. Ditto that for LAX.
And it is smart for WN to service us via BWI - that way, NO direct competition while both serve the same market indirectly.
I wouldn't think we'd get more than one flight to BWI tho. Now we need WN to give us some Chicago (MDW) and UA to give us some SFO nonstop service, then OKC would have nonstop service to every major HUB airport city. Hopefully, for 2007, we will hit/surpass 4M pax.
Then, we can finish the coasts (SEA, MIA, BOS) but I'd imagine those would be direct not non-stops. (Although, it makes sense for Alaska Airlines to have at least one non-stop revenue service between SEA and OKC at least a couple of times a week for the maintenance sched).
You know, that's an idea - we should try to get more airline maintenance into WRWA and Wiley Post, then we might be able to convince the airlines to give us a revenue flight option (once a week, at least... until things get going). A very good way to get flights to markets that we probably wouldn't otherwise justify getting non-stop; and we wouldn't havve to break the bank to support revenue.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Bookmarks