Re: OG&E Energy Center
Normally, I would agree with Kerry and Spartan concerning the residential development fronting the park. It does help a tower to front the park, in general. I do agree that a better use of the site, such as OGE at Hudson/Sheridan then Residential at Hudson/Cali then you could even repeat this on the other side along Walker for a serious dense development all on-top of a retail and parking podium. This would allow another dense development for the 'south' block and would be the most ideal for a CBD type development.
However, the more I think about it - it may not be so bad to have the north residential a half block away. After all, this is CBD so it doesn't make sense to just put up residential towers everywhere when office will always take precedent. If MGB was the center of downtown (and not the CBD) then I'd agree moreso with Kerry. This is especially true given that this is OKC and we likely wont have hyper-dense highrise development in the next 50 years.
There may be a compromise and it goes back to my suggestion that OKC develop a master plan. If that plan included a highrise residential district or area of downtown then there could be requirements such that the densest premium residential development take place near, say?, Central Park. (ala NYC or even OKC's new park). Myriad Gardens? While it is a wonderful downtown park, I think it functions more as a CBD style park rather than THE main park for downtown. This is why I hate the way DowntownOKC calls MGB/Cox/Chesapeake as the Arts District when that area really is the CBD without any towers YET. MGB really is the heart of the CBD and this will prove even more true when Central Park does get built and MGB is surrounded moreso by office highrises. ...
One other thought, is that the North Residential tower could add to the vitality of the neighbouring school. I like most others, am very disappointed with all of the parking garages next to the school - but the Residential tower could be a breath of fresh air for that section and certainly would lend a hand in filling up the streetside retail.
I wonder if there is time for this all to get hashed out? If such a master plan were in-place then it could serve as yet another but much more significant tool toward protecting existing buildings by forcing developers to in-fill when the opportunity exists rather than demolition to force the site meet your needs.
One question I have is, would it have been a better use of the Stage Center site if the school was built there (in a more urban form and perhaps retaining some of the Stage Center) and OGE built on the school's current lot? Again, a Master Plan could be useful in developing OKC in a way that preserves the city AS A CITY and might provide the city with leverage when going against the Larry Nichols' vision of what downtown is supposed to be. (no offense to Larry, I just wish he and others would learn more about urban development and the tie such projects result in critical mass is best accomplished by transit rather than so many parking garages).
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Bookmarks