It can't be "100% of the time," like you proposed. I don't want to throw out an arbitrary percentage, as it would be inaccurate.
I'm saying that I don't mind a Police Officer/HWY patrol making a stop based solely on profiling. If he gets a hit in 5 out of 10, 6 out of 10, 7 out of 10 stops.....or how many ever many times he/she discovers someone actually in the wrong...the number of true wrongdoers will be exponentially higher than if they were just making the same number of stops, on random individuals not using the same "profiling standards."
Right or Wrong...I'm indifferent.
Bookmarks