You know, I was driving around our expansive campus today between meetings and realized that we have a small freeway cap over WA-520 that connects both sides of Microsoft. I never even thought about it but today I did remember the cap not being there and there being a significant hindrance to getting around. It's just so commonplace today that one doesn't even think that it is indeed a 2009 or so construction because the expansive campus feels connected with it.
I think something even as simple as our little Freeway cap could work in OKC at Harrison Avenue probably (similar diagonal bridge, similar freeway and somewhat similar development (now) on both sides). Looks like Microsoft paid for most of it ($17M) but we did use some federal stimulus money to help build it. I'd imagine it shouldn't be too expensive to build something similar in OKC. ...
What's funny is even back then 'freeway cap' verbiage was not commonplace (or at least wasn't up here, since the Seattle Times calls it a bridge but it really is a landscaped, pedestrianized cap with bike trails running diagonally over 520).
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Urbanized,
Thanks for your like. This can become a hotly contested topic.
I know it won't be popular with some of you on this page, but I disagree with the notion of a highway splitting neighborhoods. I grew up with I-44 next to my house north of the fairgrounds and in no way have I ever felt the highway split those on the west side with those on the east side. I will agree that having no busy parallel roadways and frequent crossings of the highway helps so perhaps those crossings (that occur every 3-4 blocks near the CBD) could be redesigned and/or widened with ample pedestrian and bicycle lanes. The huge amounts of money needed to "cap" I-235 the way it was designed, would be far better spent speeding up reconstruction of other highway interchanges around town or replacing other areas of our city infrastructure. If money is to be spent on aesthetics, I'd rather see it go to burying power lines.
With all due respect, your experience as a child is completely different than most because I 44 was largely built within the Grand Blvd ROW. Little if any homes were taken for this. Whereas 235 literally blasted through the middle of a neighborhood along no existing "grain" of development.I know it won't be popular with some of you on this page, but I disagree with the notion of a highway splitting neighborhoods. I grew up with I-44 next to my house north of the fairgrounds and in no way have I ever felt the highway split those on the west side with those on the east side.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
I-35 wiped out a lot of housing on the east side along with Black Hawk Amusement Park.
Simply not true. Grand was a 2 lane path. The construction of 44 took maybe 16 houses per block.
http://www.okctalk.com/images/1969/196923portland.jpg
In the section from 10th to 23rd, 44 took one house per block per side in most places. Its interesting to see my old house when I was a kid in that photo
Can we get back to connecting downtown to the Health Sciences Center?
What's the most important factor in connecting the two?
urban fabric.
I've always thought that NW 13 WAS the connection to the Health Sciences Center.
Is there a part of the city that doesn't have a direct line to the HSC? Seriously.
I honestly don't see any problem with getting to the Health Sciences Center from
any part of OKC. That includes SE, SW, NE and NW OKC.
Just what is the problem?
Urban fabric relates to the built environment, which in this case is broken up by 235. While other states have found innovative ways to mitigate and bridge these urban expressways, Oklahoma has not, which could be an impactful thing to improve. Downtown is expanding, and the Health Sciences area would be a valuable connection, which means more than just an auto bridge, it needs to have buildings, sidewalks, and activity all the way across. This is the idea that healthy neighborhoods should be connected to other healthy neighborhoods, which the Health Sciences area is not.
Are you saying that it's hard to connect to the Health Sciences Center? I
believe it's the easiest place in OKC to get to.
Except for it being the most easily accesible place in OKC what do you believe
makes it not so easy?
Seriously.
Day or night, the HSC is the easiest place in OKC to get to.
Easy to drive there. Not so easy to walk there. Oh sure, there are like, roads and things. But studies have shown that big undeveloped areas and parking lots are impediments to walking. People are always thinking "it sure would be easy for a rapist or a serial killer to be hiding out here in the bushes". And then they don't walk there anymore.
That's why you need an environment that makes people feel comfortable about walking. You need buildings, you need stores, you need a place where walking is convenient. Bricktown has that. The area between downtown and the HSC doesn't. It feels rapey.
True. OKC is a huge city. Most people don't realize that Chicago, NYC and
San Francisco can all fit inside of OKC and leave room for another major city.
Which would make OKC like the major cities everyone wants it to be.
Which OKC does.
Thank you for telling us that OKC is better than most metropolitan areas.
As soon as these folk realize the superiority of OKC, i.e. pull their heads out
of the sand... Wait. Those people don't count.
Never mind.
Don't feed the troll. There is no need to argue with someone who you know will never change their mind.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Bookmarks