Widgets Magazine
Page 24 of 109 FirstFirst ... 192021222324252627282974 ... LastLast
Results 576 to 600 of 2713

Thread: OG&E Energy Center

  1. #576

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by soondoc View Post
    I actually posted this on another thread but think this applies here. I really love all this new construction but wish we would not limit ourselves to all of them being in the 25 foot range. They provide some density but not much to the skyline from any distance. You will still only see the Devon sticking out like a sore thumb. Actually, it will now look more like a flipped off middle finger! Why not lessen a couple buildings to 18 stories and add a couple to around 35 stories? This would give us a couple of 600 foot jewels that would add so much more to to overall look and feel of downtown. These would be close to as tall as the Williams Towers and would be seen from long distances for every person traveling through our city. I just can't figure out why we are stuck in the 25 floor range when going up by 8-10 would make a huge difference in balancing things out so much more and be soooo much more visually appealing.

    I don't want to make anyone upset because I still think this is huge for OKC but once again it shows that we don't always have the go big or go home mentality. We sometimes do things a little less than what we could do on certain projects, except the Devon, which I mentioned dwarfs everything around it. We need something that will not so much surpass Devon but that won't keep it from just looking out of place because that's the most common reaction about our DT buildings. People say the Devon looks great but you don't notice anything around it because that's about all you really see.
    Motion to delete any post that complains about the floor count from here forward? This dead horse doesn't need to be beaten anymore.

  2. #577

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    I disagree, it is not a complaint. I stated in my point of view that I was pleased with what we are getting but wished for a few more and stated reason for it. I am not bashing, making fun of it, or being disrespectful. I am merely making a case for scaling down some and adding more to others which with out a doubt would have added more to the skyline and made a bigger impact. People are free to agree or disagree, but I don't think making a motion to delete these comments is warranted because you don't personally like my opinion which I feel to be quite accurate and on point. It is true that Tulsa has built higher and didn't seem overly concerned about the extra few floors. You can make your point of view to back up or dispute my post, but you don't have to get them deleted when it is valid and a point of view from my perspective. That is called taking the ball and running home because you don't like it.

  3. #578

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by soondoc View Post
    I disagree, it is not a complaint. I stated in my point of view that I was pleased with what we are getting but wished for a few more and stated reason for it. I am not bashing, making fun of it, or being disrespectful. I am merely making a case for scaling down some and adding more to others which with out a doubt would have added more to the skyline and made a bigger impact. People are free to agree or disagree, but I don't think making a motion to delete these comments is warranted because you don't personally like my opinion which I feel to be quite accurate and on point. It is true that Tulsa has built higher and didn't seem overly concerned about the extra few floors. You can make your point of view to back up or dispute my post, but you don't have to get them deleted when it is valid and a point of view from my perspective. That is called taking the ball and running home because you don't like it.
    It's not that your point of view isn't valid but you really are beating it to death in this thread. Do you not think OGE and Clayco would be building taller if it was justified? Why don't you take it to the Mystery Tower thread and speculate on the need for BOK (or whoever is going on Preftakes) to go tall.

  4. #579

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Wasn't today the meeting?

  5. #580

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by soondoc View Post
    I disagree, it is not a complaint. I stated in my point of view that I was pleased with what we are getting but wished for a few more and stated reason for it. I am not bashing, making fun of it, or being disrespectful. I am merely making a case for scaling down some and adding more to others which with out a doubt would have added more to the skyline and made a bigger impact. People are free to agree or disagree, but I don't think making a motion to delete these comments is warranted because you don't personally like my opinion which I feel to be quite accurate and on point. It is true that Tulsa has built higher and didn't seem overly concerned about the extra few floors. You can make your point of view to back up or dispute my post, but you don't have to get them deleted when it is valid and a point of view from my perspective. That is called taking the ball and running home because you don't like it.
    For starters it is up to Clayco not any of us.
    Second, this topic of boo hoo it's not high enough has been said over and over and over and then over again. It's getting old. The economics don't support it.
    Third, its making the board toxic and annoying beyond belief.

    -We aren't limiting ourselves to 25 stories. In fact no one on this board or in the city is, it's Clayco. Push them to far and they might just say screw it we won't build anything.
    -This isn't Jenga. You can't just add some floors here and take away some here. I know very little about construction but I know some basics. The taller the building the more costs escalate. IE a 20 story building costing $200 million does not mean a 40 story building will cost $400 million. Since the towers are all very similar it's substantially cheaper to build 4 25 stories then 2 50 stories. Or do you want to make the argument Clayco should invest even more?
    -No one is stuck in the 25 floor range. It's what the market currently supports.
    -Go big or go home is a stupid cliche and no, I would rather not go home. I will take 4 25 story towers and a half billion dollar investment over nothing.

    Devon is its own company building it's own tower. Clayco is a developer. Stop comparing Apples to Oranges. If you want another mega tower I suggest you find a way to get crude back $100 a barrel.

    Clayco is fixing to invest HALF A BILLION dollars into downtown OKC for 4 towers. Clayco could buy a small market NBA team and a Gulfstream 550 for that kind of money. It is a tremendous investment on their part. Have you seen the renderings? They are absolutely beautiful. For you to state a whiny opinion that they aren't tall enough is ludicrous.

  6. #581

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Oil will go back up, I think it has been artificially lowered to decrease gas prices for political reasons. Ok, I will be fine with 4 beautiful not so high rises. I still think you missed my point that the residential are the risky ones, the commercial one's not so much. I feel they could add more to those and fill them up without blinking an eye. The residential is a crap shoot and more risky.

  7. #582

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by amaesquire View Post
    Wasn't today the meeting?
    It's at 3 pm today.

  8. #583

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Thanks! I was wondering why it was so quiet.

  9. #584

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by soondoc View Post
    Oil will go back up, I think it has been artificially lowered to decrease gas prices for political reasons. Ok, I will be fine with 4 beautiful not so high rises. I still think you missed my point that the residential are the risky ones, the commercial one's not so much. I feel they could add more to those and fill them up without blinking an eye. The residential is a crap shoot and more risky.
    Though outside of Continental Resources there are not a lot of potential tenants that would be needing more than twenty five stories all to themselves anytime soon, so it is even less risky to do another commercial tower later if the supply by these two and any others built in the interim are absorbed by the market and/or work with CR when they feel they have outgrown their current headquarters and are looking to build.

  10. #585
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,944
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by soondoc View Post
    Oil will go back up, I think it has been artificially lowered to decrease gas prices for political reasons. Ok, I will be fine with 4 beautiful not so high rises. I still think you missed my point that the residential are the risky ones, the commercial one's not so much. I feel they could add more to those and fill them up without blinking an eye. The residential is a crap shoot and more risky.
    The foreign oil countries can take a hit and continue to drive the price of oil down whether we like it or not. They won't make as much profit; however they can impact prices and production.

    https://uk.news.yahoo.com/oil-prices...7.html#QQRUZuo

  11. #586

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    It's 4:10. I need to know what is going on here. These are exciting times, the opposite of pickle times.

  12. #587

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    I also wish Clayco would bump it up to about 35 stories but it's not gonna happen. But even at 25 these are going to add a great detail to the skyline. Then if we can get a few more in the 35 story range down the road the skyline will really look great. It will happen in time. Lets hope that the Preftakes block gets a 35+ story building. OKC skyline will be changing quite a bit over the next 10 years. Can't hardly wait!

  13. #588
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,154
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Give us a bunch of 25 story buildings packed into downtown tightly and everyone will be happy, I promise.

  14. #589

    Default Re: Possible New Development South of Stage Center


  15. #590

  16. #591

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center


  17. #592

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by OkieNate View Post
    How!??!?! Why!?!?!?
    I have no idea. I don't much about this or what it means, so I'm going to keep my mouth shut for now and let others who know more about it chime in.

    In the mean time, maybe Clayco proposed taller buildings

  18. #593

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Does everyone on this site except me have a subscription to the Journal Record?

  19. #594

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by diggyba View Post
    Does everyone on this site except me have a subscription to the Journal Record?
    I don't, I just reacted to the headline.

  20. Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    the delayed vote doesn't impact the OGE tower, just the south site?
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  21. #596

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by soondoc View Post
    Oil will go back up, I think it has been artificially lowered to decrease gas prices for political reasons. Ok, I will be fine with 4 beautiful not so high rises. I still think you missed my point that the residential are the risky ones, the commercial one's not so much. I feel they could add more to those and fill them up without blinking an eye. The residential is a crap shoot and more risky.
    Off topic, but you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.

    Having said that, I do think it will go back up. If not next year, it will eventually.

  22. #597

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    I'm interested to find out why this vote was delayed. Hopefully it isn't due to a snag with the proposal.

  23. #598

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    This also has nothing to do with what is being talked about but I thought I'd post this...I think it's a lot better than the other one I made
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Rendering copy.jpg 
Views:	1185 
Size:	138.0 KB 
ID:	9409

  24. #599

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    Quote Originally Posted by skanaly View Post
    This also has nothing to do with what is being talked about but I thought I'd post this...I think it's a lot better than the other one I made
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Rendering copy.jpg 
Views:	1185 
Size:	138.0 KB 
ID:	9409
    That is just fantastic.

  25. #600

    Default Re: OG&E Energy Center

    A delay with the vote? Are they insane? Is there a problem here?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 81 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 81 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Devon Energy Center
    By Steve in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 12201
    Last Post: 12-29-2024, 06:16 PM
  2. Gulfport Energy
    By ljbab728 in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 133
    Last Post: 12-08-2021, 08:16 AM
  3. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-23-2014, 07:44 AM
  4. Connect the Ford Center and Cox Center
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-06-2005, 11:04 PM
  5. Does TULSA'S One Willams Center look like the World Trade Center?
    By thecains in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-07-2005, 02:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO