^^^^^^Thank you!^^^^^^
^^^^^^Thank you!^^^^^^
The thing is, whenever a truly dangerous epidemic happens nobody is going to take the hype seriously because of the sensationalism that has been done time and time again in cases such as Ebola, H1N1, Bird Flu, etc.
Swake,
I'm sure your post wasn't directed at me because as I said, there's no reason for panic. But I would suggest you listen to CBS and ABC news (I haven't watched NBC recently, so I don't know what they are saying, but is not just right wing, Fox and the others you mentioned. People want to know so most media is reporting it. Regardless of the impact in our country, the amount of deaths although small in comparison to the other problems in Africa (see post 65 by Bchris02) does cause concern. I do think the media in general does go a little overboard in the amount of time devoted to the subject.
C. T.
H5N1 has and is very lethal, but it hasn't spread as easily in humans as it does in birds, yet. Human infections are rare and mostly from contact with infected birds as opposed to human to human spreading. The Flu virus evolves very quickly so that could change.
You know, that whole "fake" evolution thingy. Maybe we should ignore it all then.
yeah that couldn't be because there is no proof evolution exists!!! LOL
I heard a bad possibility if Ebola mutates, but I don't known the chances of it happening. You seem to know your stuff on this issue so I didn't know if you heard anything about it.
I do think the media is hyping this way over what they should be. Mass panic is one of the worst things people can cause and it really should be taken seriously when they do that.
It's not hard to be informed, go read real news articles, check them against what the CDC is posting. Avoid the hot air machine.
Well, tbh I don't really watch the news at all. I watch AL Jazeera and keep up with BBC, but beyond that, I, I usually just keep and eye on the local news strictly for new development that is going to happen in the city
The chance of the Ebola virus recombining with influenza or some other airborne viral disease is extremely low. I think your odds of winning the lottery is better. Many genetic barriers to recombination exist and even if it does recombine, it may not even be a viable or produce functional viral particles.
It has been done in the laboratory before but only in under controlled conditions, using stripped viral parts (missing the parts that makes it "bad"), and enriched for the chances that it will recombine. Naturally, I think it would be very hard.
Why you feel the need to talk down to us is puzzling. Here's the deal: We aren't yet to the point where we are past the incubation period for exposure. God willing, no one gets sick. Beyond that, until we are past the incubation period, we have no real idea if this has been stopped. All the steps to contain mean nothing if people have the disease and aren't within the observation of the CDC. I am getting rather annoyed at the authorities attempting to shame us into submission by arguing that people exposed but still early in the incubation period haven't come down with the disease. That insults our intelligence. They may well remain well but the fact that they haven't gotten sick, YET, means nothing.
Keep spreading the fear, but just on the chance you are wrong why don't you check back in a week and see where we are?
As of right now the Dallas Ebola victim has been in the hospital for 9 days and first developed symptoms and became infectious 13 days ago. But no one he came in contact with has developed any symptoms to this point. The incubation period for Ebola is from 2 days to a maximum of 21 days, but the average is 8-10 days and this outbreak has been even faster at only 4-6 days. After 21 days a patient is considered to be safe from developing any illness. The patient in Dallas developed symptoms after 9 days.
The 13 days since he became infectious is well past the average incubation period. It’s not that no one will still become sick, but it’s getting pretty unlikely and less likely as each day passes. Even if someone does become ill, the chances of them passing the illness on to a third person is just about zero at this point. There is no outbreak of Ebola in the United States.
All I can say is anyone who came into direct contact with this individual will be quarantined and monitored during the incubation period. They'll have epidemiologists and other professionals interviewing the individual on his whereabouts and contact those who came in contact. It may take some time to find everyone but from what I understand, I believe Ebola is contagious when an individual presents symptoms.
I'm not too worried about it still. I'm still more concerned about people traveling to and from afflicted areas but I don't believe the FAA or CDC will restrict travel as of yet. It's a rather difficult situation because people will lie if they're afraid. Really the best situation is to contain the outbreak at the source, restricting travel simply ignores the problem.
I get that. What aggravates me are the people who chant, "there is nothing to fear, there is nothing to fear, there is nothing to fear, and anyone who is worried is stupid," and who pretend undiagnosed or untreated people are within the protections the CDC offers. Those same people seem to be incapable of recognizing that expressing concern is not the same thing as spreading fear. We all accept that sick patients will be cared for and medical workers will take measures to control the spead of the disease. However, when they make the argument that people who are still within the incubation period are not displaying symptoms somehow means the CDC has things under control, they sound either idiotic, or like they are trying to sell something to people who won't notice the obvious.
From Page 3:
Venture:
I'm sure glad that Mike Morgan is sticking to the Weather Forecast. =)600,000 die in this country every year from heart disease...where is the outrage over that?
Yes ebola is scary and has killed a few thousand as well, but the hype the media is going into is overdone. No need to start getting people worked up in a panic.
I wonder what the stats will be on "Stress Related Heart Disease Deaths due to Media Induced Fear of Ebola" . . . Hopefully, the death count will be acceptable. To someone.
Surely there are at least a few people who have a natural immunity to this virus.
In any case--I have absolutely NO CONTROL OR INFLUENCE WHATSOEVER over the situation.
So I choose not to worry about it.
And, I suppose, that is a stupid response.
To events completely outside
Of the abovementioned
circles of concern
and influence.
=)
Edited to Add:
well . . . "Fear" . . . and EBOLA.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks