You're kidding right? You've never used AT&T, American Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Exxon-Mobil, Dr. Pepper, Texas Instruments, OU-Texas game. If Dallas fell off the map you would absolutely notice it.
Unless of course you like any form of entertainment. Otherwise, sure you wouldn't notice LA disappearing.
Having been there a few times in the last two months, I would add Las Vegas as a global city, not world class. Although the mandarin oriental was pretty world class. It seemed like half of the strip was speaking a different language.
Everyone is free to their opinion. I consider the only world class cities in the US to be NYC and L.A.
Do you know the story of Leslie Stemmons? He was a real estate developer in Dallas. But in the early twenties, the Trinity River overflowed it's banks and flooded much of the land on either side. Dallas issued bonds to correct the flooding and some years later was about to default on the bonds. The Stemmons family bought the bonds, really cheap on a per acre basis which no one else wanted. They kept up the payments, paid the bondholders and eventually took control of thousands of acres on both sides of the river. They donated a portion to the city so a freeway could be built - The Stemmons Freeway. The Merchandise Mart is on Stemmons land, which they rent to the Mart, as well as more commercial development than you can count.
So, just for clarification, you don't think DC and Houston, the capital of the free world and the oil and gas capital of America being wiped off the face of the earth would have an affect on the global economy? I would put those two up there with NYC, LA and Chicago.
PluPan…to be real honest, those cities don't exist, not even NYC runs much of the world.
You're essentially talking about where the Stock Markets and Global Banking are most important, because what happens in NYC outside of those 2 things has little to do with much outside of NYC. Your mentioning of Beijing is off base there. Literally the only 3 that would matter are London, NYC, and a distant Tokyo.
In terms of economic impact, you could actually probably argue that the most important cities in the world are the cities where the servers holding banking and stock information sit, and those could be literally anywhere, and are likely are 1. Not in NYC/London/Tokyo and 2. Likely not only in one place.
The overall global impact of NYC falling would likely only be marginally higher than Houston falling.
That being said…the importance of a city in the global economy is really not the determining for a World Class City or even a Global City. Those Cities are defined best by how many people outside of that city (and the country in which it resides) 1. Know the city exists 2. Care to go there 3. Import/Export to said city.
It was brought up in another thread that OKC is a cosmopolitan city. What is your definition of cosmopolitan? Does OKC fit the bill and why or why not?
I believe being cosmopolitan goes hand-in-hand with being world class. Cosmopolitan cities have vibrant cultural diversity and are major hubs of global economic activity. In a truly cosmopolitan city, there is a huge diversity of culture represented and there isn't one culture that is overly dominant.
When I hear cosmopolitan referencing a city, I think of high end shopping, amazing museums, sight seeing i.e. sophisticated. Off the top of my head, NYC, Chicago, LA, San Franciso, London, Paris, Barcelona, Milan, Sydney, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Beijing and more recntly, Dubai.
Greetings from Midtown Manhattan! Stumbled upon this post when I was reading about all of the exciting new development in OKC. Dallas a world class city? Absolutely not.
In my numerous business trips to Dallas, I've always found it to be a city that seems to lack a soul and home of some of the most hideous suburban sprawl I've ever witnessed. And don't get me started on the locals there. News check....Dallas isn't Beverly Hills or NYC. (google their interesting term "Dallitude" which many locals use with pride to describe the overabundance of "$30,000 millionaires" there).
While we may not have as many retail options as Dallas in Oklahoma City, as a 14 year dual resident of NYC and downtown OKC, I can tell you I'd much rather spend time in OKC over Dallas any day of the week. This is coming from someone that lives smack dab in the middle of one of the most densely populated urbanized areas in the world (Midtown Manhattan/Hells Kitchen). Downtown / Midtown / Deep Deuce / etc. in OKC is vibrant and lively and I ALWAYS enjoy my trips back to OKC to spend time discovering the new local restaurants/lounges/etc. and hearing about the great changes we are experiencing. I did not get that same feeling of new energy in downtown Dallas on my recent stay there.
Keep up the good work, OKC![]()
Not World Class or anything official but USA Today took a readers poll and Dallas was voted as the best skyline in the world.
Dallas skyline voted best in the world in USA Today poll | Dallas Morning News
LOL...the Dallas skyline's not even the nicest one in the state of Texas.
That's the first skyline I thought of. Well, that and Manhattan.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Bookmarks