Unbelievable! Pete???
Unbelievable! Pete???
Hot Grandstand? The renderings shows a very large canopy. Being in the grandstand will provide the most shade & coolest temperatures along the entire river. As well as having the best view of whatever event you come to see. It also would increase capacity, for events which would help bring in more $ & grandstands normally has built in concessions. By increasing comfort at these events will increase quality of life (the reason we have maps) . The grandstand will also bring life to the south side of the river, which is very important.Originally Posted by Bill Crum
Cutting the grandstands would be a horrible idea.
I hope this isn't off-topic, but gabions almost always look more aesthetic and natural than concrete slabs.
Edited to Add: It just occurred to me that a lot of the concrete debris from Stage Center could be used in the construction of the aforementioned gabions rather than winding up in a landfill. It would be a good example of recycling/repurposing/steampunk/etc. If designed properly, in an ergonomic manner, the arrangement of the gabions could be multi-tasked as seating.
I agree with you on this. I hope the grandstand doesn't get cut either. If it comes down to it, like others said, I'd rather see the whitewater course finished of the best build quality money can buy, I don't want to half ass this, but MAPS 3 should either be extended or a new sales tax added to make up for the projects that were cut.
Why is that? Are we just going to ban people you don't want to see or disagree with? I can understand Bchris being banned, but you want to ban someone who, from what I've seen, nearly has every post about positive things about the city and what he wants to see done? Instead of negative criticism, he just posts things he would like to see. Goddamn man, are you guys going to come after me next for posting about wanting bigger highways???
David, I'm not trying to be hostile or argumentative with you, I'm just saying.
Continue the MAPS momentum; do whatever it takes to get these projects finished (extension, MAPS IV). You don't want to tarnish the MAPS brand that has been established throughout the years.
"Oklahoma City looks oh-so pretty... ...as I get my kicks on Route 66." --Nat King Cole.
Two reasons. 1) His constant nonsensical condescension:
What the hell does that even mean??That is where I come in. ....the adults taking the keys away from the teenagers.
And 2) His unending crimes against grammar. For proof of those, just review any post he has ever made.
Thank Panda! I want the Best for OKC, not the typical way of business we usually take.
....and guys, I'm not here for any grammar contest. It doesn't pay enough for me to be concerned w/ it.
Amen!
Let's stay the course:
Cheap or inexpensive? If you build, go with a permanent grandstand, the river has been known to shift as it carves its own course. The grandstand will have a floating stage. Some of us would prefer a grandstand instead of a grass seat; something with restrooms & running water instead of those blue port-a-potties.
...Depending on remaining budget, the fourth phase could include improvements such as a grandstand, a floating stage , Lincoln Bridge enhancements, parking, additional landscaping, additional specialty lighting, whitewater enhancements, second 1,000 meters of lighting and additional windscreens
Source: City of Oklahoma City | Public Information & Marketing
The grandstands & floating stage could allow for more events on the river...
"Oklahoma City looks oh-so pretty... ...as I get my kicks on Route 66." --Nat King Cole.
Knowing Fallin's excellence, I'm sure she goes by the handle OKvision4U.
The whole thing in a nutshell, Steve Lackmeyer does a great job with his report on this:
River Attraction: Oklahoma River is becoming a big draw for Oklahoma City | News OK
Time for Oklahoma City to have something that is second to none; let's do a world class job with what will eventually become a world class river.
![]()
The Future is Now!
"Oklahoma City looks oh-so pretty... ...as I get my kicks on Route 66." --Nat King Cole.
After Devon opened there has never been that much of a line in the bathrooms there during events, after the CHK Boathouse and Whitewater building open the probably could do the events without bring in any port-a-potties, certainly after the OU boathouse and the Sandridge Pavilion open there is little reason not to just use the normal bathrooms. Also at least at some point there was also talk of the Boathouse taking over the maintenance of the river cruzer's bathrooms and making them open to the public, instead of just the cruzer passengers.
Please note that there are also plans to eventually include an amphitheater on the South side of the river in conjunction with Core to Shore as shown here.
http://www.okc.gov/planning/coretosh...devconcept.jpg
Wow!
Thanks ljbab728, you are observant. The drawing depicts an Amphitheater (bottom center); that's adds to the discussion about what is needed. Looks like a lot of duplication we don't necessarily need since there is a viable amphitheater at the Zoo. Was this one of the wish list projects like item #10. NFL stadium draft on the river?
We need to decide what we want to build and concentrate our efforts on a few quality developments; then phase other projects in which would allow flexibility to make changes.
The link below are videos about the trails, street car and whitewater park scale models:
City of Oklahoma City | Public Information & Marketing
Should we designate the south side of river plans for housing (residential) development and the north side for adventure and entertainment?
Do we need a grandstands and an amphitheater; or is the outdoor theater someone's idea to throw the south side a bone and a few scraps?
Here are the MAPS 3 survey results: City of Oklahoma City | MAPS 3 survey results
Projections of our growth: MAPS IV will probably be eight year collections in the neighborhood of $1 billion in projects. Oh, what about MAPS V? Time to replace the Chesapeake Energy Arena or the team moves to Seattle? Just kidding...
"Oklahoma City looks oh-so pretty... ...as I get my kicks on Route 66." --Nat King Cole.
There have been plans for an amphitheater in C2S since the first draft, I think the original was larger though and would have held more people than the Zoo one.Thanks ljbab728, you are observant. The drawing depicts an Amphitheater (bottom center); that's adds to the discussion about what is needed. Looks like a lot of duplication we don't necessarily need since there is a viable amphitheater at the Zoo. Was this one of the wish list projects like item #10. NFL stadium draft on the river?
The amphitheater is probably on the south side because that way you get a view of both the river and downtown's skyscrapers from the audiences seats, which are generally considered good views when doing a structure like that. Plus when C2S was originally in planning there was no reason to expect anything like the Boathouse District as we know it, I want to say it was penciled in as possible low rise residential, Regatta Park (the area around the Chesapeake Boathouse) might have made it into some of the later versions.Do we need a grandstands and an amphitheater; or is the outdoor theater someone's idea to throw the south side a bone and a few scraps?
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Bookmarks