Zoo, that wasn't meant as a shot at you. I enjoy reading everyone's take on this, it was just a question.
Zoo, that wasn't meant as a shot at you. I enjoy reading everyone's take on this, it was just a question.
Please have my friend in your thoughts and prayers. He was the loadcontroller and ramp lead for MH17 that day in Amsterdam. He supervised and coordinated the loading of all of the cargo and baggage, the weight and balance of the airplane, and ultimately was one of the last people on the ground to talk to the flightcrew both in face and later over the headset in the final stages of preparing the flight to be pushed out of the gate for departure.
This is really rough on him, and I'm sure he will be under quite a bit of stress as the investigation continues, as he will be under some intense investigation and questioning as he supervised and signed for the loading of the aircraft and it's contents. This is turning into a highly political situation, and I'm sure the nations under investigation would like to put the blame in part on anyone other than themselves., or would like to ensure nothing of political volatility was loaded and in transport on this flight. I'm sure the emotional weight just from being involved is enough, not to mention the investigation.
I am sure this is hard on him, poor man. All parties have pretty much determined this was from a missile so he will likely be in the clear. It must still be very difficult.
I have no doubt he is in the clear. He's a good guy. However, aviation investigations usually end up going through everyone who had any contact with the airplane. He will be under close investigation as well as all other people who were involved.
It really puts things in perspective, just a normal day at the job, a normal sequence of events -- resulting in a chilling end. When I sign a load sheet, or sign for other security related things -- you don't really understand the weight of your signature until something bad happens. As he is now realizing, and so am I.
This is an actual An-26 which was the supposed target by the conspiracy people...
![]()
My post didn't even approach 'motive' - so I'm not sure why your reply would rely so heavily on motive. But, since you ask, the motive has been spelled out many times. The separatists thought they were shooting down a military transport plane. A theory well supported by the circumstantial evidence.
As for the multiple layers, motives and history of this conflict - not of any particular interest to me - I was simply addressing the question of "who shot the plane down."
Hate to even bring this up again, but the U.S. propaganda campaign being waged through the government and the mainstream media against President Putin is despicable.
Pat Buchanan has hit the nail on the head in several columns and David Stockman (Reagan administration) writes a beautiful op-ed....Hope you'll take a couple of minutes.
My Thoughts on Pat Buchanan's Brilliant and Incisive Take on Washington's Ukrainian Fiasco - by David Stockman
The original column by Pat Buchanan that prompted Stockman's column praising Buchanan's Insight:
Is Putin Worse Than Stalin? by Patrick J. Buchanan
Those who profit from war and and support the U.S. backed coup in the Ukraine are looking for anything to re-start the Cold War.
I'm thinking that you need to take all of that to the politics thread.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks