Conservatism is so often equated with anti intellectualism. It's a given - just ask them the ones opposed to them.
What I've found is that there is, indeed, many conservatives who see the world in simple terms. They don't make it complicated. They don't feel sadness at the lack of sidewalks or that liquor stores are closed on Sunday. If they notice such things at all, they make a Saturday liquor store trip and never look back. Most of them are darn solid on decision making.
The progressives are consumed with first world problems and seem genuinely miserable most of the time. They call it being intellectual but in the absence of true big intellect and a real joy in ideas, most can't pull it off.
Knowing how to actually think is far more important than what you think actually think about.
And when elected representatives at the State Capitol essentially give Oklahoma citizens the finger when it comes to doing something about abolishing prohibitive laws based upon nonsense, then it's up to the citizens to get back at the situation by organizing petition campaigns to abolish or reform prohibitive laws.
I do not understand a mindset that is actually offended that you might have to think ahead. Yes, it can be a tiny bit annoying but for it to go to the top of the list of bad things about the city either says this is a fabulous town, or that some people are incapable of planning ahead. Really, why is this such a big deal?
Some of us would like to have the same freedom and liberties found in other enlightened and civilized states. We are adults, not children. But I reckon some people fear too much that the more freedom and liberty the government grants, the more severe the aftershocks and social problems. Probably Missouri, with it's less restrictive laws against alcohol would tend to dispute that.
I don't fear anything of the kind. I just don't think it is a tragedy that liquor stores are closed on Sunday. People are smart. They really can overcome such primitive conditions. I don't care if they change the law but think it is kind of nice that liquor store workers can get the day off and not get competed out of business. I wish most places could give their workers at least one day on the weekend off to be with their families. People who work 9-5 often don't appreciate that our convenience comes at a price to the ones who have to provide it.
Completely agree.
Extreme conservatives are all about enforcing their morality on the masses. They think alcohol consumption is sin so they will do everything they can to keep the laws as restrictive as they possibly can and derail any ballot measure that might liberalize the laws. They aren't really about small government. They are about BIG government controlling people's personal lives and decisions. THAT is what is wrong with this city and state.
Seeing the misery closed liquor stores on Sundays cause some people is actually kind of entertaining. Sorry, but it is.
I don't personally care that they are closed on Sundays. It would be nice if you could get real beer (chilled) and wine in the grocery store like a normal state. It would be great if you could buy it after 9PM. Keep the package stores closed on Sundays, give them their day off.
Switching gears but somewhat related is the fact that some brewers refuse to sell their product in Oklahoma because of the laws. On top of that, liquor laws are a huge contributor to, though certainly not the only reason, for why OKC has such terrible grocery stores.
Changing the laws would benefit the consumer in many more ways than people realize, plain and simple. Even people who don't drink would see benefit in terms of nicer and more numerous grocery stores.
You have no clue regarding the history of Oklahoma's liquor laws, do you?
And, you do know that about 20 states still have dry and mixed counties, including your beloved North Carolina, right? You would probably be shocked to know about the states that have restrictive or "odd" liquor laws and that OK is certainly not alone.
The liquor laws were born out of the prohibition movement which was widely supported when Oklahoma became a state. 3.2 beer is a leftover from that era as it was considered non-intoxicating so could be sold regardless of prohibition. Over the course of time from 1959 when prohibition was finally repealed in this state until today, there have been very few times when liquor law questions have made it to the ballot, but I believe every time it has, it has always passed.
I do believe however that liquor stores could once stay open later but hours were reduced to the current 9PM in hopes of cutting down on drunk driving. Was that change voted on by the people or was it passed by the legislature?
Sounds like a wikipedia response. Obvious and sounds like it should be right, but it isn't really the story.
I know state officials wanted to keep brewer-run saloons, which had a reputation in other states as being houses of vice and violence, out of Oklahoma. Because of that, the laws are on the books today that prevent brewers from selling house-crafted beers over 3.2 ABV on premises. Go go any restaurant in Oklahoma that brews its own beer and it has to be 3.2. If it's higher, they have to sell it to a distributor and then buy it back.
You are parroting stuff without anything to back it up. The whole alcohol is a sin is nuts, these days. Even the generation that came before mine was blowing off that mentality. I personally don't even know anyone who thinks like that, including my 90 year old father in law. I know they're out there but their influence is non existent.
Extreme conservatives used to be more about demanding a moral norm but in addition to changing attitudes than began forty years ago, the puritans have been shoved aside by progressives who are the ones with strong opinions about what's right and wrong, zero tolerance for traditional religion or lifestyle, zilch self introspection and a fixation on "big" issues and trivial, with little concern for real world moral quandries everyone faces on a daily basis. I wish they'd notice the many ways your average conservative Joe tries to be a good person, balance the things life throws at him, worries about his job, his kids, his neighbors, etc. instead, these feckless narratives paint them into puritans.
I had an entire response typed up, but I will simply say I was raised in the Independent Baptist movement. They are extremely legalistic, very political, and far more numerous than most people realize. There is one church in OKC that has probably 3,000 people on a given Sunday as well as operates its own school and Bible college. If you ask most people in this city if they've heard of that specific church they would probably say no.
bchris, they have a point that conservatives aren't anti-alcohol. A research study was released a few years ago that people who go to church are somewhere around 25% more likely to binge drink than those who don't. The problem plain and simple is the liquor lobby. Its a hugely profitable business and they can buy legislators very easily. Liquor taxes and markup are huge. A $20 handle of vodka costs the store well less than $10 to purchase. If you really want progress, start targeting these legislators voting down looser laws.
LandRunOkie is right, on both accounts. The lobby is strong
And you think you can define the opinions of people in Oklahoma concerning alcohol sold on Sunday by its churches? In my world, churches are filled with all kinds of people and even back in the day when I attended a Baptist church (decades ago) this wasn't an issue even on the radar. Do you honestly think people sit around worried about the sin of selling alcohol on Sunday? If they could pass liquor by the drink decades ago - with the fear of drunks on the road after getting liquored up at the local Hairy Bears and running over pedestrians - why in the world do you think people decades later would be so conservative that they feared Sunday liquor stores on account of sin?
I would strongly caution against doing a Google image search for "Hairy Bears."
You have some "what's" identified, but not the "why's", and so far haven't identified the right "who's". Knowing the sequences isn't the same as knowing why things happened, who was and is behind it, and how they have stayed in control.
As the say, follow the money. It's more about the money than the morals.
There are currently 13 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 13 guests)
Bookmarks