That is a great piece. (You should probably credit the artist) There were two photographers that I was very impressed with. The one with a lot of Italian scenery prints and the artist that took close up pictures of glass artwork showing the swirls and details. I find the husband/wife team where the husband take the photo and the wife then extends the photo onto the mat by painting extremely artistic and great use of mix media, All three were fantastic. My point is that this is a nationally respected and highly ranked fine arts show of which cheap commercial spaces do not belong in this level of a show.
Thanks for the building compliment.![]()
Jeep, I understand where you're coming from but I have no problem with it. If that's the worst criticism of our great Festival of the Arts, we are in great shape. The vast majority of the visiting public could care less and that's what is important in its continued success.
Some guy from Colorado, properly vetted, with an artist's eye.
(the recent flooding, up there, didn't negatively effect him)
His first name was Dana.
We really wanted the "loss leader" (the original) but couldn't afford it so we settled. On a print. =)
Thank You, Sir, for Your Building Into The Proper Environment. of Historical OKC.
Agree 100%. The quality of the art was down this year. Lot of cheesy "dogs playing poker"-type stuff. Also, how many different artists featured paintings of Venice? There's usually a better balance of fine art and crass commercial crap; this year, the crass won out. There were a few stand outs, but it was less engaging than in past years.
Well . . . That sucks. I'm glad I went to a different Arts Festival.
(could this be one of those "Beauty Is In The Eye of The Beholder" or "Perception is NOT Reality (only perception)" deals?)
In all honesty, the ten dollars for two hour parking enabled us to "cut to the chase" rather than being overly critical of the offerings.
Of Actual Artists rather than online "commentators".
ps: a sentence using "the quality of the art" is . . . indefinably bad. for lack of a better term.
(and you call yourself a guru?)
RM, I guess I'm blind. I missed the dogs with a full house in your purchase.
Everyone is an art critic who fails to get "engaged"
And a sonic would be perfect for yours. It's too high class for Braum's.![]()
On my attorney's advice, I should note that the artist who captured that scene (one that most people would never ordinarily notice) is Dana Echols from Windsor, Colorado. He seemed to be a super nice guy and had some other nice photos for sale as well. The temporary placement of the picture, in my picture, is where I do the nearest thing to "art" that I do. (the cooktop) =)
oh. btw: for the mundane among us here is where the photo was taken. I don't think actual "Kingfishers" live in Colorado. The name probably involves artistic license.
https://www.google.com/#q=kingfisher+point+fort+collins
p.s.: and at the risk of "gilding the lily", so to speak, there's this:
http://www.danaecholsphotography.com/
My wife and I were just discussing our visit to this year's Festival of The Arts and she made a couple of excellent observations and suggestions. While the closest thing to "art"--that I do--is cooking and dabbling in music, her artistic talent resides in the ability to work with fabric. She is an excellent seamstress, for lack of a better term. Her thought, especially in response to the well considered observations of, among others, Jeepnokc, was, "It's ALL art."
She said that what sets some art apart from other art is the fact that it is one of a kind and not some knockoff or copy. She indicated that she saw some jewelry and other stuff that appeared to be mass produced. (unlike each of her fabric creations).
My translation of Her suggestion is that perhaps different areas of the Fesitval Venue could be set aside for various levels of "'artistic' 'integrity'".
In other words, keep the [trash] off of the main Artists' Walk yet have the other stuff available for less picky (or selective) individuals. Another thing she said she noticed--and about which she was concerned--was that there weren't any "Artists of Color"--except for Asians--on Artist Tent Row. And she is a dyed-in-the-wool Tea Party and Sarah Palin supporter, so this is probably another flaw with the plan for a different day. Personally, I wasn't paying any attention to that sort of demographic so I didn't notice it. I guess it's one of those Mars/Venus deals.
We aren't saying that the Downtown Oklahoma City Festival of The Arts should be a redux of The Great State Fair of Oklahoma--except without a monorail, a midwestern space needle or a racetrack--yet sometimes, perhaps, the best integration involves unbiased segregation. None of which has anything to do with "race" "creed" or "color".
Put the Car Giveaway and the Direct TV hype as far from Artists Row as possible. Maybe over in Bricktown or over around 10th and May Avenue. =)
To me, the best part of Festival of the Arts is the chance to talk to the artists and listen to them tell about their medium and methods.
I think you nailed it, amigo.
It's sort of like a "brush with greatness" even if they don't use a brush.
I was really hoping to "meet again" with the incredible sculptor (in bronze) whose work at least equaled that of Frederick Remington. Some of which we hope to see during our upcoming Staycation Visit to Woolaroc later this week. He didn't "copy" Remington . . . He took what Remington did to the next level. (imho). He wasn't there this year . . . probably on account of some of the factors Jeepnokc introduced into the discussion.
I used to work with a guy who kept a 1-minute timer on his desk. Regardless of who the visitor to his office was, he'd start the timer and if you didn't get his interest or your point across in the one minute, you would be dismissed. My kids know this guy and have started bringing a timer with them when we visit this type of event. They forgot the timers at the last Chuckwagon Roundup at the Cowboy Hall of Fame and I got to talking to a weaver there. They just showed me their cell phones and walked away. I did get distracted in the discussion and had to phone them to find them later.
Indeed, Dubya . . . We are on the cusp of a Brave New World . . . with an attention span limit of about thirty seconds.
In fact, I think a lot of people are tripping over the cusp on account of there isn't a warning sign.
I sort of missed not seeing Greg Burns at this year's exhibit . . . and that guy who used to live in Norman with those interesting black and white, profound message etchingesque drawings. But other stuff made up for it, so I didn't miss them too much. Didn't like having to check my watch to see if my "Two Hours For Ten Dollars" parking validation was close to expiring but I didn't worry about that too much either. =)
Part of the problem is that the jury process is blind. You are not allowed to have people or any signs or other identifying items in the booth shot you submit for jury selection. Thus, unless the juror was familiar with the artist's work by sight or the art was clearly ethnic art (couldn't think of better term), the jurors would have no way of knowing the ethnical background of the artist. They literally put 4-8 jurors in a room and they flash up the artists' work (usually 3-4 slides of work plus a booth shot) for a few seconds and they go through hundreds and sometimes thousands of applications on the first pass. Usually they are just given a number or a yes, no, maybe to do the original sorting and then the second round will go into more detail. I have not watched a second round as most are closed to the public where we can attend the first round. The voting though is not known at time of voting but sometimes they will let you know the general voting afterwards of your work. (ie...made 2nd round, 2 yesses, one no, three maybes. etc) As a photographer, I could distinguish what I thought was original, creative photography when they were going through but all of the jewelry applicants looked the same to me.
Actually, yes it is.
Ethnical - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Nice ride. Sort of like some sculpture on wheels.
We were intrigued by the work of this artist:
Mood Modern Lamps by Will Richards
Perhaps it's because one of my brother's hobbies is creating one-of-a-kind lamps out of various types of metals and other components. They are very interesting and take untold hours to create. It has to be a labor of love because he could never price and sell them for what they are worth in terms of time and skill and imagination invested. He gave us one a few years ago as an anniversary or Christmas present and it stands proudly in one corner of our living room. I don't know much about art, but I know what I like. (as the old cliché goes . . . =)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks