Where there is smoke can also be mirrors, though.
And also this isn't a mid-rise, as I's say this can pretty safely be classified as a high-rise. Now idk if that distinction makes a difference, or if the LLC name was meant to poke fun at our "world class" developments, or what. It just sticks out in my head.
Steve mentioned the I-44 building in regards to what may or may not happen at the lumber yard. For those not around back then this is what he was referring to.
http://www.okctalk.com/general-civic...oaday-ext.html
![]()
I don't think these renderings will ever be built exactly to the tee. More than likely its just to garner interest from a lot of different parties. Financing, construction bids, and the final end users.
But there is obviously something going on with this land, and its starting to unveil itself one piece at a time and quickly.
One good thing about downtown property prices starting to go up dramatically: If a property is purchased for millions 1) it's unlikely someone will just sit on it; and 2) when it is developed, density is required to justify the investment.
Also notice a trend with all of the sites formerly under consideration for the CC...
nm
^
That Broadway / I-44 rendering was posted in 2009, by the way.
There's also two mid rise buildings in the conceptual renderings. Maybe the high rise element was added after the LLC was formed and named. I imagine it's also the more tentative element of the plans, but I'm just guessing.
What's interesting is, based on the specs, 60 of the units would be in those mid rise buildings. They look to be about 15 stories, which would mean about 2 unites per floor. Feel free to check my math there, but it seems like those would be some pretty fat units.
Also 6000 square feet seems like a low number for the retail space. There's a lot of boulevard frontage that could probably double that amount, unless they are thinking of having pretty good sized lobbies. Of course, this is all from looking at a drawing, so I could easily be way off.
6,000 sq feet of retail space isn't much at all.
Possibly, but it says "43 Story Tower" and 516 "Tower Units". It would weird to be referencing the mid rises as towers, imo. Not that any of it is more than ideas at this point. I've certainly been in some condo buildings like that that had two units a floor (and even one on some floors). It would certainly be cool to see that in OKC.
I doubt the retail would face the boulevard anyhow because through this area there won't be much of it at grade which will impact any chance of walkability along the boulevard. It crosses the canal and then has to go under the railroad tracks and EKG. I think the retail would be on the street between the towers.
Actually depending on how you search, one page still says Canada, and one Oklahoma.
Canada - Bricktown - Humphreys & Partners Architects. L.P. - Humphreys & Partners Architects. L.P.
OKC - Bricktown - Humphreys & Partners Architects. L.P. - Humphreys & Partners Architects. L.P.
I thought First National was the fourth tallest building west of the Mississippi when it was built.
There are currently 35 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 35 guests)
Bookmarks