[QUOTE=Dubya61;752917]I understand this statement completely (even if I disagree, somewhat), but does Ed have any vision looking forward?[/QUOTE]
He's gonna fix the bus stops.
Unlikely, that is a campaign promise after all. The only thing we know for certain is that he turns his back on those.
At least we're telling the truth.
I've already said Mick is not precisely the candidate I would create from scratch were I Pygmalion. I'm a Democrat and more liberal than him. I am posting a reason I'm voting for him on Facebook daily and I'm up to Day 20 though. But he is the one I trust, especially to keep moving OKC in the direction I want to see it go. We have two choices essentially, and choice Ed is such an awful one that I really don't see Mick as a choice, but rather necessity.
[QUOTE=bchris02;752529]I agree. Those who I am referring to voting for Ed because of social issues are extremely politically unaware. I always am sure to tell them that Ed does not have OKC's best interests at heart, and that social issues are completely irrelevant in positions like mayor of OKC.
Low information voters have power in numbers. Consequences suck, sometimes.
One of Shadid's advisers is taking bets that the "scientific" poll is way off. Desperation is ugly.
Last night on the news I saw David Slane pushing Minimum wage changes for Oklahoma. He had 3 or 4 others tagging along with him. In the last shot, Ed Shadid was positioning himself behind Slane to be in the picture.....Nice
Oh, I wasn't trying to sat anyone was in lockstep - sorry if it came out that way. To me, this just seems like a no brainer - I mean, just look at the progress OKC has made under Mick's leadership - not to discount others involved. Upon reflection, I guess I can see how someone closer in but not downtown might feel slighted by priorities. We live out past the burbs and expect to be pretty much ignored and see it as a trade off but worth it to us. No matter who gets elected, not much will change for us and it just seems like the city has been doing so well. If Mick really has lived in NYC for two years I find that offensive. At the same time, seems like the roads have regularly been sanded and the lights kept on during his tenure.
Mick got an executive MBA. From what I know of an executive MBA, as my son is/was in the military and a lot of his active duty friends got those, you go to class on weekends. For some schools it is every weekend, for some less frequent. As I've said elsewhere, if you pay your mayor $25,000 a year, you shouldn't expect him to work weekends.
Actually, here it is: http://www.stern.nyu.edu/programs-ad...gram-overview/
So, for an executive MBA at NYU you have class 4 days a month, two Fridays and two Saturdays.
I don't know about Mayor Cornett, but my son actually applied to NYU for a regular MBA. He had decent grades and a good but not through the roof GMAT. His only claim to being different was that he went to the Naval Academy and is a Navy helicopter pilot. NYU not only offered him a full scholarship, but they offered him a stipend as well. He ended up going to a different school, but I remember NYU because that stipend and full tuition sounded really good. So I'm guessing it's possible that Mick could have gone there tuition free. While we just think of him as our mayor, he's actually got a pretty amazing national reputation for a small city mayor. Business schools fall all over themselves for that kind of stuff. A lot of them throw money at students they want. And, if you know your schedule in advance, you can get really cheap fares on Southwest, I know. Maybe he's got a family member or close friend who lives there he can stay with, dunno. As I said, I know nothing about what sort of tuition or airfare Mick had to pay, I just know what's possible.
I'm not sure it's just Kool-aid Edgar's drinking.
Very disappointing to see Cornett getting so much support, as his campaign is meant to appeal to self-centered old folks. MAPS was about collective ambition and youthful energy and so many here are ready to give him credit for it when it so clearly runs counter to his values. The fact that his strongest support is with the senior citizen crowd shows where this city is headed and clearly reveals the age of many of the biggest asses on this board. Lip service to attracting young people that Cornett hypes so much is just that. Another four years of outdated values and mediocrity for OKC. Transparency in government and the replacement of Jim Couch will have to wait.
Out of curiosity, where on earth did you get the notion that the mayor, irrespective of who is the mayor, can change the employment status of the city manager. Are you not aware that the mayor is simply one of several co-equal votes on the OKC council horseshoe? If a change in city manager is a major need, why wouldn't that be a even a speck of the press for the job from any one of the challengers?
Not defending the city manager. Not crucifying him. But who holds that job bears no direct relationship to who wins the next mayor election.
Had there been a better progressive candidate, I might have agreed with you a bit. As I've been telling people, when the alternative is so bad, Mick isn't a choice, he's a necessity. Change for change's sake is a mistake. You'd better make sure you're changing to something better, and Ed is clearly not better.
While I guess I'm one of the old asses, I espouse many of the values of my children and their friends. And they're agreeing with me on this one. Mick is the person who said, "I want to create a city where my children and grandchildren want to live." Regardless, Ed can't remove Jim Couch anyway. You're mistaken there. All he can do is ask the Council to vote on removing him, which he could have done anytime in the past two years. There's the best argument against Ed for the people who want change: In a weak mayoral system, a council member has just as much power as the mayor to effect the kind of change city laws allow the council. Ed is just as powerful as the mayor in that regard. And so one could quite reasonably ask why he hasn't done any of the things that he's criticizing the mayor for not doing.
God you are a piece of work. You come in and act all high and mighty, touting class and race issues, and then come post drivel like this. You could not be any more wrong. I've never seen so many "self centered old folks" disguised as young vibrant professionals in my life.
You apparently are just a bitter person who hasn't had things go his/her way and doesn't want anyone else to enjoy anything if you can't.
My kids left for greener pastures long years ago but if the city continues to step up its game, other parents/grand parents might get to keep their family closer.Mick is the person who said, "I want to create a city where my children and grandchildren want to live."
Me too Penny. Except for my youngest. He's still here, living in Midtown and enjoying all the stuff there is to do there now. If there weren't, he'd be gone too. My others aren't really opposed to living here, but while off in school developed entangling alliances that keep them elsewhere.
There are currently 17 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 17 guests)
Bookmarks