Widgets Magazine
Page 6 of 32 FirstFirst ... 234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 779

Thread: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

  1. Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Hemingstein View Post
    Since this is the aviation thread, I thought about a little airport I recently visited in Duluth. For a small operation, their airport was first rate. It is a great example of what I wish we'd accomplished here in OKC when we redid Will Rogers. Small, but very nicely done with good attention to detail and quality construction.
    I think our airport is nicely done, has good attention to detail and was built with quality construction. And I travel a lot. Although I have not been to Duluth's airport, I have to say.

  2. #127

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    I would disagree heavily with attention to detail.

    I have OCD (which means I REALLY pay attention to details) and our airport drives me insane.

  3. Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by catch22 View Post
    I would disagree heavily with attention to detail.

    I have OCD (which means I REALLY pay attention to details) and our airport drives me insane.
    Like what? Can you give some examples of where OKC gets it wrong and examples of how other airports get it right. I mean, I pay attention to details, just go to any of the Disney parks and resorts and you'll be finding beautiful details everywhere you look. So I get what you are saying, but what is the expectation for an airport, something that seems fairly utilitarian to me...I don't expect details there, just get me in and out easily, have pleasant architecture and clean restrooms. In those areas, I think our airport is better than most.

  4. #129

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Celebrator View Post
    Like what? Can you give some examples of where OKC gets it wrong and examples of how other airports get it right. I mean, I pay attention to details, just go to any of the Disney parks and resorts and you'll be finding beautiful details everywhere you look. So I get what you are saying, but what is the expectation for an airport, something that seems fairly utilitarian to me...I don't expect details there, just get me in and out easily, have pleasant architecture and clean restrooms. In those areas, I think our airport is better than most.
    The gates/concourse area at WRWA isn't bad at all -quite airy, spacious, inviting too. I'm not a fan of the green/black signage, but that's more personal preference probably. However the parking garages/tunnel/elevators are disgusting IMO. The finish and decor there is more fitting for a factory or hospital basement, not the gateway to our fine city.

  5. Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by no1cub17 View Post
    The gates/concourse area at WRWA isn't bad at all -quite airy, spacious, inviting too. I'm not a fan of the green/black signage, but that's more personal preference probably. However the parking garages/tunnel/elevators are disgusting IMO. The finish and decor there is more fitting for a factory or hospital basement, not the gateway to our fine city.
    I really don't understand why they don't fix up the tunnel and elevators. That is probably the worst part of the terminal right now.

  6. #131

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by venture View Post
    I really don't understand why they don't fix up the tunnel and elevators. That is probably the worst part of the terminal right now.
    I think design is underway on a tunnel re-do...

  7. #132

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by cafeboeuf View Post
    I think design is underway on a tunnel re-do...
    Yes I believe so. They will also be painting the exterior of the 5-story garages. Both are much needed.

  8. #133

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Also, effective in the May schedule for United (6MAY-4JUN) united will run 2x daily mainline (including weekends) to IAH. In addition to the 8 regional jets per day. Equipment will be A319 (128 seats) at 0630 and 1515 departures. On Sundays the 0630 will be a 737-900 (167 seats).

    June schedule not constructed yet, but I imagine this will continue into the summer.

  9. #134

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Just curious if anyone knows what happened to F9 187 this evening? Got cancelled - saw the plane parked away from the gate with airstairs attached. Pax were all lined up at the podium, no agent in sight.

  10. #135

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    They pushed it into the grass between the ramp and the taxiway.

    This is current...Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	169 
Size:	1.49 MB 
ID:	6833

  11. Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Ooops.

  12. #137

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    My company assisted Frontier but unable to recover. Will sit until a professional recovery team can get it out.

  13. #138

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Poking through the United May schedule indicates EWR-OKC will be run with an E170 on Tuesdays. It will be a one way up gauge, but it is important to note that as more E170's come online, OKC-EWR may be a potential route served daily. A much needed and desired route to have a better airplane on than the 145s. Again, this is just a day of week up (Tuesday) gauge and not a daily up gauge.

  14. #139
    HangryHippo Guest

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by catch22 View Post
    My company assisted Frontier but unable to recover. Will sit until a professional recovery team can get it out.
    I know this is going to come off sounding completely ignorant and most likely stupid, but can they not just power up the engines enough to get the wheel back on the concrete?

  15. #140
    HangryHippo Guest

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by catch22 View Post
    Poking through the United May schedule indicates EWR-OKC will be run with an E170 on Tuesdays. It will be a one way up gauge, but it is important to note that as more E170's come online, OKC-EWR may be a potential route served daily. A much needed and desired route to have a better airplane on than the 145s. Again, this is just a day of week up (Tuesday) gauge and not a daily up gauge.
    That's very good news and hopefully a sign of things to come. That 145 is too cramped.

  16. #141

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Hemingstein View Post
    I know this is going to come off sounding completely ignorant and most likely stupid, but can they not just power up the engines enough to get the wheel back on the concrete?
    The left main gear sunk directly behind the concrete about a foot or so. It's effectively a foot tall cement curb to climb. The pilots ran the engines up to about 70% and could not break free.

    The second method was to transfer as much fuel as structurally allowed from the left wing into the right wing to get as much weight off the left main and try to pull it out with a pushback. Unsuccessful. The tires are too deep into the soil to make it over into the concrete.

  17. #142
    HangryHippo Guest

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by catch22 View Post
    The left main gear sunk directly behind the concrete about a foot or so. It's effectively a foot tall cement curb to climb. The pilots ran the engines up to about 70% and could not break free.

    The second method was to transfer as much fuel as structurally allowed from the left wing into the right wing to get as much weight off the left main and try to pull it out with a pushback. Unsuccessful. The tires are too deep into the soil to make it over into the concrete.
    Interesting. I didn't realize it sunk over a foot.

  18. #143

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion


  19. Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Was hoping for an E170 or E175 but I guess I will take a CR9 to start.

  20. #145

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Tier2City View Post
    Just saw it too! Good stuff. Now let's hope OKC-PHL is next!

  21. #146

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by s00nr1 View Post
    Was hoping for an E170 or E175 but I guess I will take a CR9 to start.
    I don't hate the CR7/CR9 like some people do. Still alright up front. AFAIK AA/US don't have ovens on the Embraers either, so it's not like you're getting a hot meal on those.

  22. Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by no1cub17 View Post
    I don't hate the CR7/CR9 like some people do. Still alright up front. AFAIK AA/US don't have ovens on the Embraers either, so it's not like you're getting a hot meal on those.
    Its comfort I am concerned with -- Seat width on a CR9 is 17.5" compared to 18.25" on the E70 and E75.

  23. Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by no1cub17 View Post
    Just saw it too! Good stuff. Now let's hope OKC-PHL is next!
    CLT is the focus first, up to an additional 50 nonstop flights are being added. PHL is still a possibility down the road.

  24. #149

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    I'd rather have PHX before PHL, but I guess WN already serves PHX non stop right?

  25. #150

    Default Re: 2014 Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by pahdz View Post
    I'd rather have PHX before PHL, but I guess WN already serves PHX non stop right?
    That's correct. We also had previous nonstop service between OKC and PHX on America West which merged with USAir. It was discontinued long ago.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2014 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion
    By venture in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 541
    Last Post: 03-09-2015, 05:47 AM
  2. General Weather Discussion - January 2014
    By venture in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 203
    Last Post: 02-02-2014, 09:54 AM
  3. Oklahoma Commercial Aviation Discussion 2013
    By venture in forum Transportation
    Replies: 807
    Last Post: 12-24-2013, 10:20 PM
  4. Oklahoma Commercial Air Service Discussion 2012
    By venture in forum Transportation
    Replies: 437
    Last Post: 12-29-2012, 03:18 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-15-2009, 07:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO