Re: OKC's skyline ranked ahead of New York...
I totally agree, Chicago Skyline is the best in this country, if not the world!!! Hands down!
But in oklahoma, I think OKC edges out Tulsa. Tulsa has a few that are taller but 163feet is hardly that much taller.
I think what hurts Tulsa is what helps OKC, density. Downtown OKC is much much more dense than Tulsa - and has that big city feel inside of it.
Tulsa might look impressive from that hill (to the NE of downtown i believe) but OKC would look even better if it were in a similar geography.
Look at Seattle's skyline - not that impressive if it were in a region like OKC (flat, lack of highrise hills), but in its setting - it looks absolutely stunning.
So my point it - it doesnt often matter the height of the buildings. Chicago has height and it needed it - for it to be #1 in almost everyone's book, in addition to its density and 2+ mile wide/length size. Tulsa/like Seattle, captured its natural setting to create scapes which make it look bigger than it is. Which also works.
OKC built a dense model which ran out of funding, otherwise, it would be much more similar in nature to that of Calgary, AB - arguable the BEST skyline for a city the size of 1M. They have OKC's density with all of their planned buildings built (unlike OKC which collapsed before all could be built).
Yes, I agree that OKC needs the next signature tall boy for the state - but I also think OKC's dense skyline is the already the best in the state.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Bookmarks