Widgets Magazine
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 75

Thread: Barons done after next season?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Barons done after next season?

    "Need" For OKC Conference Hotel Might Push Barons Out Of Downtown

    I don't see another arena being built, plus the Barons only draw 2,000 a game anyway (although it's 3,000 currently, but I I promise you from being at games, it's way less) hockey in OKC just isn't a draw anymore.

    And I say after next season, because that's when the current lease ends.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,697
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    The Barons could play in the Peake without interfering much with shows or NBA games. We've done it before. Is it "worth it" to do so? Not my call, but I do believe it can be done.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Quote Originally Posted by shawnw View Post
    The Barons could play in the Peake without interfering much with shows or NBA games. We've done it before. Is it "worth it" to do so? Not my call, but I do believe it can be done.
    I would love that, but just don't see it happening. That's why the Barons have been in the Cox, it's not just the cheaper rent, they couldn't get in the Peake.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,697
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    The city owns both facilities. I think if Cox went away, they'd find a way to make the Barons work in the Peake before they risked losing them.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    If Staples Center can host 2 NBA teams, an Arena team, an NHL team, a WNBA team, plus concerts and other shows: the Peake can host the Barons.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    I think more than anything, the attendance is what will drive the Barons away. Will they get better attendance in another city? Who knows, but it's been awful for the Barons every season.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,738
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Quote Originally Posted by GoOKC1991 View Post
    I think more than anything, the attendance is what will drive the Barons away. Will they get better attendance in another city? Who knows, but it's been awful for the Barons every season.


    Is the ice plant at the Jim Norrick State Fair Arena in operation? The arena seats 9,760 for ice hockey and the parking is free. I think the Barons could survive better on the west side of town at Fair Park.




    Jim Norrick State Fair Arena, seating capacity for ice hockey 9,760

    The Barons drew a crowd exceeding 9,000 on the inaugural night when the AHL first dropped the puck in Oklahoma City (2010-11) and it has been a difficult task and challenge to renew hockey since the arrival of the Thunder and the Blazers' departure.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Quote Originally Posted by Laramie View Post


    Is the ice plant at the Jim Norrick State Fair Arena in operation? The arena seats 9,760 for ice hockey and the parking is free. I think the Barons could survive better on the west side of town at Fair Park.
    The web page for the arena still list ice shows as something they do. Even if it needed updating they just put a new one into the Cox's arena like a year ago that looked modular enough it should be relatively strait forward to relocate it

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,697
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    The web page for the arena still list ice shows as something they do. Even if it needed updating they just put a new one into the Cox's arena like a year ago that looked modular enough it should be relatively strait forward to relocate it
    They have a Disney on Ice show there every year at the fair right? I don' think a rink is the problem. Having been in that arena recently, it's "fine" for this purpose, but could use a freshening up. However, I'm not in favor of shipping this particular activity out of downtown any more than I'm in favor of putting the soccer stadium at the fairgrounds.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Who covers the operating loss?parent club or prodigal?

  11. #11

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    They might get better attendance in a better arena (Peake > Cox). Of course, that's if you believe every team who has demanded a new arena over the last 40 years.

  12. Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    I think more would attend it if were at the peake. just curtain off the upper deck and Im pretty sure capacity would be smaller than cox center, if not the same. they do this for the SA Rampage at the ATT Center.

  13. Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Quote Originally Posted by worthy cook View Post
    I think more would attend it if were at the peake. [b]just curtain off the upper deck[b\] and Im pretty sure capacity would be smaller than cox center, if not the same. they do this for the SA Rampage at the ATT Center.
    They used to do that with the Blazers. I think they said that lowered the capacity to a little over 10,000.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    This has been discussed so very much in other threads. There are two concepts presented here that merit divergent discussion.
    1. Cox is (should be / might be) going away -- wither the Barons?
    2. The Barons are not as popular as the Blazers were and simply can't complete with the Thunder.

    With respect to the Cox Convention Center, see this: http://www.okctalk.com/general-civic...ox-center.html and Cox Covention Center - OKCTalk where the discussion seems to center around:
    a. Don't demolish it until you've got a replacement in mind.
    b. Don't demolish it -- it's very useful.
    c. Demolish it and build structures with a higher purpose (maybe even taxable structures in this very important part of the CBD).
    d. Demolish it and move all the Cox Convention Center activities to the 'Peake
    e. Can't do it -- the Thunder play there
    f. The Staples center changes the venue set-up much more frequently than the 'Peake ever would.

    It's distressing to imagine that because we have the Thunder, other sports simply can't compete. Not one thread comes along that mentions the Barons that doesn't eventually have some post that says attendance sucks and the Barons are going to have to go away.
    See http://www.okctalk.com/sports/29515-...ckey-town.html and http://www.okctalk.com/sports/28585-...-atop-ahl.html
    Although I haven't seen the stats lately, the trend in attendance is up, not down. Further, the support from the Oilers to the Barons and Oklahoma City couldn't be better.
    My hope is that we should secure reasonable prices for the Barons to share the 'Peake or start now to develop a better arena at the fairgrounds and let the Cox Convention Center go, when a higher purpose arises for the real estate.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    The Barons current average is 3,051. Worst of the four seasons.

    2010-2011: 4,155. 2011-2012: 3,684. 2012-2013: 3,527

  16. #16

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    few tid bits... some tickets to the thunder are cheaper than the Barons cheapest tickets.

    I don't think Clay wants to share the arena with a triple a team, (sees this as being little league not Big League)

    The blazers attendance over the years has been greatly exaggerated. I went to blazers game quite a bit in the early 90's. Many of the tickets people had were free. I actually liked them playing at the state fair arena more. I would say on average the blazer paid attendance was probably around 6k, their Christmas night games vs Tulsa were legendary

  17. #17

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCretro View Post
    few tid bits... some tickets to the thunder are cheaper than the Barons cheapest tickets.

    I don't think Clay wants to share the arena with a triple a team, (sees this as being little league not Big League)

    The blazers attendance over the years has been greatly exaggerated. I went to blazers game quite a bit in the early 90's. Many of the tickets people had were free. I actually liked them playing at the state fair arena more. I would say on average the blazer paid attendance was probably around 6k, their Christmas night games vs Tulsa were legendary
    Thank you!!!! I think I mentioned that in another thread, but nobody agreed. That's partly why the Blazers were gone right after the lease was up, the Yard Dawgz moved for their final two seasons to the Cox and the Barons have been in the Cox.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCretro View Post
    The blazers attendance over the years has been greatly exaggerated. I went to blazers game quite a bit in the early 90's. Many of the tickets people had were free. I actually liked them playing at the state fair arena more. I would say on average the blazer paid attendance was probably around 6k, their Christmas night games vs Tulsa were legendary
    I probably went to around 30 Blazer games - and never once bought a ticket. All I had to do was drive over to WWLS and get them for free.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCretro View Post
    few tid bits... some tickets to the thunder are cheaper than the Barons cheapest tickets.

    I don't think Clay wants to share the arena with a triple a team, (sees this as being little league not Big League)

    The blazers attendance over the years has been greatly exaggerated. I went to blazers game quite a bit in the early 90's. Many of the tickets people had were free. I actually liked them playing at the state fair arena more. I would say on average the blazer paid attendance was probably around 6k, their Christmas night games vs Tulsa were legendary
    I guess have to disagree with your assessment. I was a multi-year season ticket holder for the Blazers in the 90's. I NEVER thought the attendances were inflated. Especially when they played at the Myriad, when they announced that there were 9,000 people, it was because there WAS 9,000 people there.
    And I've heard it said many times that "many tickets were given away"... I don't know about that. I was a ginormous Blazers fan, and I NEVER got a free ticket. I must have been the DUMBEST fan they had, if that was the case. But, even IF they gave away ticket, at least people were there! I think Bob Funk Jr, and his group, pretty effectively destroyed hockey interest in OKC. And I'm just afraid they're gonna do the same thing to soccer. They're already hedging their bets with ANOTHER soccer team in Tulsa.
    And I have also heard from several people that the Oilers are looking to move their farm team, especially since the fan support has been so tepid here

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,697
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    It's not up to Clay. He doesn't own the arena.

  21. #21

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Quote Originally Posted by shawnw View Post
    It's not up to Clay. He doesn't own the arena.
    No, but if he has a request, the city will listen. I went to Blazers games, Yard Dawgz and go to Barons games, you start hearing things, and this is the main reason we have been told of the said teams folding, moving to and playing at the Cox.

  22. #22

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    Quote Originally Posted by GoOKC1991 View Post
    The Barons current average is 3,051. Only Adirondack, Albany, Portland and Abbotsford are worse.
    Albany began play the same year that OKC did. Adirondack and Abbotsford the year before. Portland has been an organized AHL team in its current location since 1993. The four you mention are located in regions with a long-standing hockey fan base and have relatively few peer or greater sports competitors with possible exception of Adirondack in eastern New York State. If that's your yardstick, I'd say the Barons are doing OK for a fledgling team.

  23. #23

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    The original Blazers played at the Fairgrounds arena.....

  24. #24

    Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    The Fairgrounds Arena might still be an option? I remember that the Blazers used to switch back and forth, in fact, from the then-Myriad. Although I read in the Oklahoman of the ice being chippy and soft after the first time they played there (probably because the refrigeration was used to warmer ice for ice shows, and had a little dust? I don't know), wasn't the refrigeration renovated since the early nineties?

  25. Default Re: Barons done after next season?

    I'm not sure how much attendance matters in the AHL. The top attended team draws 9000 average. The bottom is 2500. The AHL is about having players ready to go to the parent team at a moment's notice. The purpose of the AHL team is more important to the parent team than AHL attendance.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Barons Update
    By White Peacock in forum Sports
    Replies: 396
    Last Post: 05-20-2015, 10:49 PM
  2. 2012-13 Barons
    By jedicurt in forum Sports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-10-2012, 02:36 PM
  3. Barons weekend
    By BrettL in forum Sports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-08-2010, 02:42 PM
  4. OKC Barons
    By Thunder in forum Sports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-29-2010, 02:45 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-22-2010, 02:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO