Please stop letting Garin and Prunepicker be representatives of religious people in terms of science. I know they don't speak for me.
Anger and love you can't see them but they exist in all of us.
LOL! That's cute. You shouldn't feel sorry for them. In my class they
were allowed freedom of thought. If you, and others on this board, had
a class you would immediately eliminate or bar some information from
entering your class room because of your bias. Those would be the kids
to feel sorry for.
Are you saying Jesus is the wind and he touched you by moving the hair on your arms?
Well, 3 sources, Matthew and Luke are derived mostly from Mark and Q, which I'm sure you'll argue against. Most gospels also weren't written until much later, and disagree in several regards. Regardless, it's a book written by men, just as numerous other old books are. It's not proof.
Was talking about this at work today. Just found this website with some interesting information:
Gospels Not Written By Matthew, Mark, Luke or John « The Church Of Truth?
Where in the world did you get your information? Matthew and Luke
aren't derived from Mark or vice versa. The same goes for John. And
just where do they disagree? You said in several regards.
The Bible is 66 books written by men inspired by God. It's quite
sufficient evidence.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Bookmarks