data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7391d/7391d462a4d422628be24131959d1f1ff0c4bf48" alt="Quote"
Originally Posted by
Plutonic Panda
Well, I try and take into account of the metro. For me, a tier 1 city should have at least 15 million people in the metropolitan area. I never really take into account just the city, because if that were the case, Dallas and OKC aren't much different in terms of population, seeing as Dallas has 1.2 million people and OKC has 600,000.
If OKC were to hit a serious population boom, we could easily have 1.2 million people living here in ten years, as long as the boom lasted. Yes Dallas could grow, but Dallas is pretty much tapped out at this point, the majority of the growth will happen in the suburbs, not in the Dallas city proper. With all of the land inside the OKC city limits, I think we could easily catch up to Dallas, in terms of population city wise. As far as the metro area, I don't think OKC will get to 7 million people anytime soon. I don't think it is unrealistic to say if a major population boom, similar to Austin's, that we could see a possibility of a combined metro population of 4 million in a decade or two.
Bookmarks