So is the entrance to the restaurant actually on the northeast side facing the Canal and Toby Keith's? Glad it's not facing the parking lot. Gives it more interaction with the canal.
So is the entrance to the restaurant actually on the northeast side facing the Canal and Toby Keith's? Glad it's not facing the parking lot. Gives it more interaction with the canal.
To reiterate, the area marked "private dining" in that drawing is two separate glassed-in rooms (that can be made into a single room). The rooms are completely visible to the rest of the dining room through the floor-to-ceiling glass walls, but can be instantly rendered private and the glass opaque/frosted at the flick of a switch. I thought that was a particularly cool feature.
The privacy features are great but it still doesn't fix my concern regarding the separate menus and clientele. If its a couple that's a party of two, they aren't going to be placed in "private dining" and therefore still have to be in the main dining area. I am eager to see how the atmosphere compares to some of the nicer restaurants in which I order nicer entrees, wine, etc. I just cannot seeing this having the ambiance or feel of places such as Mickey's or the Ranch, yet still demanding the same price.
I didn't feel at all that the menus were "separate" when I looked them over (again, it was a draft menu). Like I said, I was there on a training night, so the "Baller" menu wasn't an option, but everything on the other menu was reasonably upscale, and there was nothing I would really consider downmarket about the menu or the restaurant. I can tell you for a certainty that I wouldn't feel comfortable going into the place in shorts and a T-shirt (which is funny, because I do that at the Mickey Mantle's bar ALL OF THE TIME).
I would place the REGULAR menu probably somewhere between Red Rock and Mickey Mantle's/Red Prime/Ranch as far as its offerings. That's the REGULAR menu. Preliminary prices on the menu were surprisingly reasonable (less than $30 for an 8 oz prime filet WITH two sides), but there is nothing about the place that says Hooters or sports bar. It is unmistakably upscale.
Other than the fact that the general manager of HSRG's Wes Welker's, (and former longtime GM of Mickey Mantle's) who I was dining with pointed out to us that they were prime. Now, they might have just been for that night, but who knows. All I know is what was there that night was indeed prime. And outstanding.
Regarding the meatloaf, I forgot to check the price. The whole evening was a comp (due to being a training night), so I didn't pore over pricing like I probably should have. The filet just stuck out to me because it was outstanding...AND served with two sides rather than a la carte...AND was sub-$30....
More photos from Kd's Facebook page:
I walked by the north side of the building today. Absolutely no interaction. The patio is very small and not connected directly to the canal pathway. Also on a different elevation.
Someone get hogan out of this city.
It is very open to the canal. In the spring with people sitting outside it should be nice. I know a 10" step up may be a major barrier to some people, but I just don't get it being a problem. More of a problem is the lack of anything interesting across the canal from them. The Sonic building is dead at night and people don't hang out there.
The design is far better than what Hogan originally proposed which had NO interaction with the canal. This is probably the best thing west of the Harkins, by far. It's still underwhelming compared to what could have been though. All of Lower Bricktown is such a catastrophic waste of an opportunity. It is the epitome of all that is wrong with OKC.
I've never liked the Centennial because of two things: 1) not all brick with cheap looking EIFS/stucco on the upper floors and 2) it misses an opportunity to create a defined corner on Reno and has a setback/parking in front of Starbucks. If only the original designers had replicated the look of the existing buildings on the canal..
Yes, we all hate green, even a few feet of it. Darned anti urban grass. (btw, if that's considered equivalent of a nice suburban yard, then I understand the lack of understanding of the appeal of single family residences many on here have.)
Why not focus first on actually getting a good canal side experience in upper BT? Serious lack of inter connectivity there, but lets gripe about a couple of feet of grass where someone actually has created a nice canal side dining area despite a serious lack of canal ambiance on either side or across the canal. Lol.
I walked past KDs on the canal last night and thought it was a marked improvement over what was there before. I suspect when weather improves it will have some decent patio action.
Not entirely correct. On many weekend evenings during the warm months, some of the city's teenaged breakdancers duck-tape cardboard to the stage there and perform (which would be in view of that patio). Last time I was there during such a performance I was surprised to find more than 20 people sitting there watching them (and putting money in the tip jar).
Not entirely correct. On many weekend evenings during the warm months, some of the city's teenaged breakdancers duck-tape cardboard to the stage there and perform (which would be in view of that patio). Last time I was there during such a performance I was surprised to find more than 20 people sitting there watching them (and putting money in the tip jar). I know it's not enough, but it's SOMEthing...
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)
Bookmarks