This is great comparison. You can see that even in side by side, "apples to apples", comparisons our "urban courtyard" doesn't look very urban and is pretty bland compared to others in the same class. But the real point is that the Courtyard was built on the only available lot that sat right next to our new 20k arena and directly across the street from our large and updated convention center. Time will only tell, but that lot would have been much better suited for a much bigger hotel. And, because of the hotel market in which it was built, it was a big compromise for that location and in retrospect was a huge missed opportunity. Hopefully, in 10 to 20 years, OKC will be worth the risk.Other urban Courtyards:
http://marriott.com/property/propertypage/PHLDC
http://marriott.com/property/propertypage/PITCY
http://marriott.com/property/propertypage/WASCN
http://marriott.com/property/propertypage/DENCD
http://marriott.com/property/propertypage/HOUDT
Our urban Courtyard:
http://marriott.com/property/propertypage/OKCDT
I am not saying that the Courtyard and the Residence Inn are bad hotels on their own or that we don't need their low price points in our inventory, but they are eating up prime development space that could have, and I guess I feel should have, been used for more ambitious hotels. I don't think the residence property needs to be bigger, but it is pretty unoriginal, even with the brick. It doesn't incorporate the canal very well and, yes, looks very much like a Meridian Ave development.
Yes, they are better than empty pad sites in the short term. My point was that in the long term, if we really wanted be able to host larger conventions, these projects will be in the way more than they are an asset. In the long term they could be a factor in stunting our convention and tourism industries, because the prime locations on which any ambitious hotel would need to be located to justify and recoup its expense have all been developed with ponderous ones. Neither are flagship developments that would look favorable in comparison to most modest hotels in other markets, yet they are on our most important properties.
I think many still have the approach that "it's good enough for OKC". But if you want to grow and attract visitors and conventions who have dozens of similar options, you want things that are both distinguishable and memorable, as well as accommodating. The most logical thing would be to commit your most visible spaces for development to those goals. These do not do that.
I am not saying that everything has to be a Colcord or Skirvin. All I am saying is that this is a very pedestrian hotel on what was supposed to be a very defining public attraction. This and the Courtyard are compromises anyway you slice it and, hopefully, in 10 to 20 years OKC is regretting those compromises instead of still having to make them.
Bookmarks