What in the hell was wrong with the original design? I don't understand what this city does sometimes... Why do we pick apart this development when RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD there's a parking lot being built with a hideous hotel as a side project?
What in the hell was wrong with the original design? I don't understand what this city does sometimes... Why do we pick apart this development when RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD there's a parking lot being built with a hideous hotel as a side project?
Original, Alt 2, or Alt 3 - IMO.
good design, good project.
Option 3 please
This is an okay project, but please don't confuse it for a high quality project. As long as they continue to allow cheap and noisy through the wall air conditioning units they will be marginally better than motels.
And please tell me how you would give each room it's own unit without making it cost twice as much?
And did they remember all the utter crap they approved in lower bricktown? Please
The city never placed Lower Bricktown under the design ordinance. Design for Lower Bricktown is regulated by the Urban Renewal Authority.
It's a zoning overlay or base zoning (depending on the type). They City would have to initiate a rezoning and send it through Planning Commission and City Council. Doing it without his consent would normally never work. The City just withdrew its application from the NE 8th and Lincoln area where they were rezoning a whole neighborhood without consent. While this is different, the politics involved are not dissimilar.
Besides, Lower Bricktown is built out isn't it. I thought KD's took the last site.
officially - yes. technically - HE%L no.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks