Widgets Magazine
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 42

Thread: The "new" I-40

  1. #1

    Default The "new" I-40

    I went thru there this past Friday to see what I had heard about having not even known they finally re-did the sorely needed crosstown expressway.
    WOW!! It was all I could do to stay on the road (well that and the strong wind!) from wanting to take it all in! It took me several minutes to release how far away from downtown it now is but seemed for the most part, to be pretty cool!
    Could anyone tell me what that crazy "art" structure was? Some kind of scissor metal looking thing laid on what I think might have been a indoor crosswalk maybe?

  2. #2

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by purpledice42 View Post
    I went thru there this past Friday to see what I had heard about having not even known they finally re-did the sorely needed crosstown expressway.
    WOW!! It was all I could do to stay on the road (well that and the strong wind!) from wanting to take it all in! It took me several minutes to release how far away from downtown it now is but seemed for the most part, to be pretty cool!
    Could anyone tell me what that crazy "art" structure was? Some kind of scissor metal looking thing laid on what I think might have been a indoor crosswalk maybe?
    You might want to check out this thread.

    http://www.okctalk.com/transportatio...pdates-64.html

    And this one.

    http://www.okctalk.com/showwiki.php?...mments&page=85

  3. #3

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    The "Art" structure is a depiction of a scissor-tail flycatcher (doing a mating dance), and the name of the bridge is "Skydance Bridge". It is a pedestrian bridge from the future North Central Park to the even more future South Central Park.

    If you went by during the day, you missed the lighting of the structure during the evening.

  4. #4

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Or at least some so called "artists" idea of a scissor tail flycatcher. Sure hope it didn't cost the tens of millions like the statue on the Capitol.

  5. #5

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    It did. But having a pedestrian bridge was required for us to get federal highway dollars. Might as well have one that doesn't suck. After all, it got you to say "wow". Everybody I know thinks it looks neat.

  6. #6

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by hoyasooner View Post
    It did. But having a pedestrian bridge was required for us to get federal highway dollars. Might as well have one that doesn't suck. After all, it got you to say "wow". Everybody I know thinks it looks neat.
    The Bridge cost 10s of millions...did the actual "sculpture" cost that much?

    Also...it's pretty dang cool at night, and for the truckers and other people who have to travel at night, I'm sure it's a nice little surprise on what is probably a long and arduous trip.

  7. #7

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by Teo9969 View Post
    The Bridge cost 10s of millions...did the actual "sculpture" cost that much?

    Also...it's pretty dang cool at night, and for the truckers and other people who have to travel at night, I'm sure it's a nice little surprise on what is probably a long and arduous trip.
    the cost of the bridge and sculpture combined was 5.8 million

  8. #8

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    the cost of the bridge and sculpture combined was 5.8 million
    so the sculpture was probably 1-2?

  9. #9

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by Teo9969 View Post
    so the sculpture was probably 1-2?
    ODOT payed 3.5 million for the bridge project. OKC payed 2.3 million total; though some of that 2.3 may have been spent on the actual bridge, I do not know if we had to match some percentage on that, it also includes what they payed for study and design.

  10. #10

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Was a pretty cool red last night on the commute home

    Anyone know offhand when the whole thing should be done specifically westbound near I44?

  11. #11

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by sidburgess View Post
    It did and generally, most people like it or love it.
    It's ODOT cilantro. (or, as a childhood friend of mine who walked away from OU with a Masters of Fine Arts once said: "It's art. Get used to it.")

  12. #12

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Thanks for all the replies. Very interesting!

  13. #13

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by Teo9969 View Post
    The Bridge cost 10s of millions...did the actual "sculpture" cost that much?

    Also...it's pretty dang cool at night, and for the truckers and other people who have to travel at night, I'm sure it's a nice little surprise on what is probably a long and arduous trip.
    I've travelled I-40 from one end to the other. I will say I-40 through OKC is probably the second most interesting urban stretch, with the most interesting being through Albuquerque. The new crosstown is definitely impressive and gives a more urban feel to passers through, as urban as freeways can be I guess. What OKC needs is a light rail line connecting downtown with Norman and with Quail Springs.

  14. #14

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
    I've travelled I-40 from one end to the other. I will say I-40 through OKC is probably the second most interesting urban stretch, with the most interesting being through Albuquerque. The new crosstown is definitely impressive and gives a more urban feel to passers through, as urban as freeways can be I guess. What OKC needs is a light rail line connecting downtown with Norman and with Quail Springs.
    light rail, no
    commuter rail, yes

  15. #15

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by PHXguyinOKC View Post
    light rail, no
    commuter rail, yes
    Okay this is probably a stupid question, but, what is the difference?

  16. #16

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by sidburgess View Post
    Don't take this the wrong way but Google is an amazing thing -- try it: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...cp.r_qf.&cad=b

    I found this in the top three results: Comparison of 'Rail' transit modes
    No your right. I'm just lazy sometimes. lol

  17. #17

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by sidburgess View Post
    Don't take this the wrong way but Google is an amazing thing -- try it: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...cp.r_qf.&cad=b

    I found this in the top three results: Comparison of 'Rail' transit modes
    Sid, you'll find this useful.

  18. #18

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    The cost of the bridge and structure combined was actually $12.8 million, according to NewsOK. Nevertheless, I love it!

    "The estimate for the cost of the bridge was about $5.2 million, well under the $6.8 million budget. But unexpected problems pushed the cost estimate to $12.8 million as architects were working on finalizing the design, city officials said."

    Read more: Skydance Bridge to be redesigned | NewsOK.com

  19. #19

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    the 12.8 mil was before the redesign

  20. #20

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by KayneMo View Post
    The cost of the bridge and structure combined was actually $12.8 million, according to NewsOK. Nevertheless, I love it!

    "The estimate for the cost of the bridge was about $5.2 million, well under the $6.8 million budget. But unexpected problems pushed the cost estimate to $12.8 million as architects were working on finalizing the design, city officials said."

    Read more: Skydance Bridge to be redesigned | NewsOK.com
    That is the actual design that they will use? I do not know...I think I better see it in person if I like it or not

  21. #21

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by MonkeesFan View Post
    That is the actual design that they will use? I do not know...I think I better see it in person if I like it or not
    That article is 2 years old, the re-designed bridge has been up and running since last Christmas.

  22. #22

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    I am still not sure about the cost as the redesign kept adding to the cost, not taking away from it. How they went from the reported $12.8 million down to $5.8 million they are saying it cost on the City's website (City of Oklahoma City | Public Information and Marketing) doesn't add up (or is it subtract down). Supposedly the only thing they cut were the then decorative cables. Could those have really cost $7 million???

  23. #23

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    I think the old design looks better.

  24. #24

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Print it out and kiss it if you love it that much. It's in the past. Move on.

  25. #25

    Default Re: The "new" I-40

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCisOK4me View Post
    Print it out and kiss it if you love it that much. It's in the past. Move on.
    What is wrong with you? I just said I like the old one better. Thats all. I wasn't trying to make a big deal out of it. Sorry.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. FOX NEWS: Michael Moore's "Sicko" is "brilliant and uplifting"
    By PUGalicious in forum Arts & Entertainment
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 09-08-2007, 11:22 PM
  2. In process of "saving" Christmas, many aren't very "Christ-like"
    By PUGalicious in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 02-18-2006, 10:40 AM
  3. "Christmas" missing from Bush's Whitehouse "Holiday" Cards
    By Faith in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-07-2005, 04:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO