Originally Posted by
RadicalModerate
So . . . does this mean that under the equal protection clause of the constitution of the united states of america, that case law previously precedented, indicates takes precedence over any provisions in the constitution of the state of oklahoma and implies that if one was or were to wear an eskimo joe's tee/sweat shirt--that is, an item of apparal that, for the record has and will indicate a real property the sales of which far surpassed the 51% requirements established by law for income dirivatives based on a busness venture vis-a-vis the relative resources from "alcohol" as compared to "other" merchandise and that the wearing the above mentioned article of clothing into a convenience store in Henryetta would allow for the purchase of 3.2 beer on sunday as long as you do not dance? or what?
Bookmarks