Originally Posted by
Rover
So, you want to be in a prime desirable location but not pay for it? And this is somehow a class issue? Is it that people are entitled to the best without paying for it?
This isn't a class issue. The issue is that as these areas are more and more desirable the prices will increase with the demand. It is purely economics, not social discrimination. If you want true urban density then you must be willing to pay for it. If you want cheap then dense urban is not what you want. In places like NYC multiple individuals share small apartments to be close in...OR they commute from one of the less desirable areas like Brooklyn, Queens, etc. It has been easy for some on here to take shots at Okies for not walking...well we can take a shot at Okies for just not wanting to do what others do in other cities when they want the better locations and properties. Go find a roommate and pay the rates or don't complain when someone else does. Building cheap, cheap housing that will become dilapidated in 20 years isn't the answer.
There will always be financial inequality and those that have money will always be able to out-bid those without. That is far different than social discrimination.
Bookmarks