Their is enough room for the new weatbound bridge itself to fit without destroying the bridge first but to do so with the old eastbound bridge and traffic going west still operating will complicate the foundation of the new westbound lanes just west of the bridge. The new eastbound bridge can already accommodate 7 lanes in it's normal configuration if they temporarily use both the breakdown land and the right shoulder.
Guys, just be patience and wait for it all to be completed, then feel free to drive on it when allowed.
Not sure if were taking about the same bridge. I was taking about the westbound bridge at May Avenue that they built way back at the beginning of the project. Surely it will have more lanes than it does now. The new eastbound(under construction at the time of this image) is almost as big as the current eastbound and westbound put together.
jn1780 -
I'd like to know about the new west bound bridge over Agnew - the new east bound bridge has been up for a good year, but it looks to me that they will have to close the East bound exit to Agnew to have room for construction. That's unless they somehow divert the traffic.
I drove it the other day. The posted speed limit was 10 mph...
In one of the meetings it sounded like they wanted to be able to do divert traffic in case another large chunk falls out of the old crosstown by January-ish but it would still going to be mid 2012 before they would expect to be moving traffic over if no real incidences happen with the old one.
The details were not elaborated on but what I expected was that both lanes would go on the new eastbound bridge until the westbound one is finished. It is 5 normal lanes with two spare on each side for breakdown, so at least 3 each way with comfortable room on each side could be done.
ODOT has done a terrible job keeping people informed and updating their website.
No new photos or videos for over six months, right when there is actually a lot of activity taking place.
They always blame funding for delays and cost overruns but it seems pretty obvious they aren't particularly good even at things that are completely within their control.
Not to mention the department of transportation website is vintage 1995...
I suspect that the i40 crosstown website only had resources due to how controversial it had been earlier on, as the possibility of court rulings or political will to change the path dwindled so did any need they felt to keep it up. According to it's timeline no work or contracts have happened since 2010.
Heard from a very reliable source that we will be driving on I 40 by the end of the year. I hope so.....
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Bookmarks