Further related reading from around the web:
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/...permit/244250/
and this one:
http://http://reason.com/blog/2011/0...the-food-truck
Further related reading from around the web:
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/...permit/244250/
and this one:
http://http://reason.com/blog/2011/0...the-food-truck
You mean they didn't complain to you. I suspect they complained to someone.I'm certain they are probably glad you're not their neighbor too. But they couldn't have known the electricity would go out. Utilities said it was a combination of their electrical needs and so many AC units on in the area. Electricity was out for about 4 hours and none of the 11 houses effected complained.
Why on earth was this thread moved from one of the main boards? Too much traffic? Come on, moderators! This easily fits under Urban Core or Civic Issues.
Not sure how it ended up in Current Events... Was probably my mistake.
Moving it to Civic Issues.
You assume too much and know too little. They wouldn't complain to me at all. They are all in the HOA and nobody had a problem with it. Unlike you, people do realize sh*t happens. Of course these are people with shared driveways, 100 year old plumbing and learn to get along.
The issue I still have is the article that Steve wrote says that organizers sought, and got, feedback from officials and named an official that they got confirmation from that all their ducks were in a row, and then that same government entity shut them down basically by saying the official's earlier direction was incorrect. I mean they didn't say that, good luck getting an official to ever uniquivically admit they were wrong or made a mistake... which is a whole other topic unto itself, but if records really show they had previously said the event was good to go then changed their mind and never bothered to contact the event planners then that is a problem.
On a separate issue, I agree that the organizers should not have proceeded without whatever permit it was they were turned down on. I would like to hear more about that. But Steve's article says that particular permit was not the issue and had nothing to do with Health or ABLE's shutting down of the trucks.
So what happened during today's council meeting?
Meg Salyer said that she was working with City Manager Jim Couch to try to streamline or at least clarify what all the city approvals are needed for such event to cut down on confusion. Skip Kelly went on a rant about how people were treated hosting this event and previous past events by enforcement agents.
It seems as though all the bad publicity has given the planners of this event even more tenacity and determination. Apparently the food market is well on its way to becoming a monthly event with some of the organizers busily working the ropes on how to make sure all their ducks are in a row for next month.
I would bet that this entire mess will actually end up being a bit of blessing in disguise.
1) The publicity will only help the event
2) Law / code enforcement personnel will likely be easier to work with in the future (understanding they are under greater scrutiny)
and
3) The lessons learned will help others who will no doubt attempt similar events, as this one seems destined for success
Amen, Pete! The agents are very much aware that the next time they attempt to harm the economy, the potential is there for a huge riot that will rival historic riots. We do not want that to happen. Hoping to see next month have more trucks. Is there a web site? We need accessible info on date and time as I'd like to be there in case the agents attempt their tricks...they'll have to get through me first.
Nope, not a Thunder action, because I will never take part in a riot. However, you are being delusional, because you think that only gutter/ghetto fools take part in riots. Not true, not true one bit. There can be many people just like you that will just simply snap and do their part in a riot.
If the permitting issue is a zoning one, I don't see how this is going to be a quick and easy fix. I've seen zoning issues take many months to sort out. Are there avenues to expedite the process or make exceptions?
Agree with Pete 1000%. The publicity this has gotten has folks talking. Lost count of how many people I heard discussing this at various places as I ran errands today (and no, i didn't bring the subject up). If everything had gone as planned, would there be this much awareness of the event? Doesn't hurt that the public sentiment is squarely behind the event organizers & vendors.
Sadly Larry the public can be very fickle and forgetful. If the next event is two or more months away by that time the public will have forgotten and gone onto something else. Even if reminded the public would be pretty apathetic. Public sympathy is pretty effective short term but long term not really so much. IMHO
Next event will be Sept. 30.
Steve, you deserve a great deal of credit for covering this so thoroughly and putting key people on the spot.
Otherwise, we would have been left with "they didn't have the right permits" and that would have been that.
I agree that Steve has thankfully brought this to light. If it had been left to the vendors, organizers, and most folks there lack a certain cache with the media that Steve brings to the table. The scrutiny issue works both ways however. Not only will the "G" be on better behavior the folks in charge and the vendors have zero latitude in absolute compliance. If not next time at sometime in the future the "G" when you least expect it can and probably will make life difficult. It is the way of the world. And the way they act can be very, very subtle.
Both of you have helped the process and the downtown community. The merging of online media meets old school reporting is a powerful one.
Now then. If this would turn from a few food vendors into a Lost Horizon Night Market, we would have something.
In the meanwhile, I hope they get it worked out.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Bookmarks