Widgets Magazine
Page 17 of 51 FirstFirst ... 1213141516171819202122 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 425 of 1262

Thread: Level Apartments

  1. Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Reality?

  2. #402

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete Brzycki View Post
    From today:

    WOW, that's smokin'!!!!

  3. #403

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Progress as of July 28, 2011




  4. #404

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    From today (note there are now vehicles on the Aloft site):


  5. #405

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Curious, is there anything planned for the NE and SW corners of 2nd & Oklahoma?

    Now if someway, somehow they could extend Oklahoma Ave south through the parking lot to connect to Bricktown at Main..


  6. #406

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Would there be an issue with railroad right of way there?

  7. Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Yes. The planned HSR connection to Tulsa would use the Rock Island ROW. I think it will probably be raised, however.

    BG918--the parking for the Aloft will go right up to Oklahoma I think, and there is nothing planned between Oklahoma and the Clark Bldg, also currently under renovation as you can see in the pic. OH the NE corner, yes, Level will be built-out to complete the entire block.

  8. #408

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    OH the NE corner, yes, Level will be built-out to complete the entire block.
    Yeah, I was gonna say, isn't there suppose to be park/pool area to the east of the parking garage and then that is to be surrounded by more apts.?

  9. Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Precisely. There is a site plan somewhere around here I think..

    edit:
    http://www.levelokc.com/project

  10. #410

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Quote Originally Posted by BG918 View Post
    Curious, is there anything planned for the NE and SW corners of 2nd & Oklahoma?

    Now if someway, somehow they could extend Oklahoma Ave south through the parking lot to connect to Bricktown at Main..
    You've got the rail line there that would connect to the Adventure District. We have been hoping that Aloft will construct some stairs, but I don't know if they'll be allowed to. We call it the "Cliff Route" but most of us who live in the area use it as our access to Bricktown.

  11. #411

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments


  12. #412

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Oh, thanks! Yes, outdoor area on the westside & pool/outdoor area on the eastside.

  13. #413

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    From today... They are kicking butt!




  14. #414

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    I'm sure this has been answered so I apologize, but what part of the building is the grocery store going to be on? And is the area of dirt to the west of the parking structure also part of Level's development, and if so, are they building anything on top of it, or is just going to be street parking or landscaped open area?

  15. #415

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    The grocery store will be in the SE corner. If you look at post 412 you will see the west side will be similar to the east. They just poured the footings on the north side last week.

  16. #416

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    [QUOTE=BG918;455350]Curious, is there anything planned for the NE and SW corners of 2nd & Oklahoma?

    Now if someway, somehow they could extend Oklahoma Ave south through the parking lot to connect to Bricktown at Main..

    I agree. These neighborhoods should be better linked.

    Businesses flourish when they are easy to get to.

  17. #417

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Is there any movement to eventually have Oklahoma extended south from NE 2 to Main? It likely would have to be a bridge like Walnut so the abandoned tracks could be used again someday (possibly HSR to Tulsa). Oklahoma is already a main corridor through Bricktown and could be the same in Deep Deuce, especially since it connects to NE 10.

  18. Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    No movement that I know of. Might not be a bad idea, but man, activism only goes so far, and there are sooo many issues to take up right now that it's daunting if you think about it.

    It's funny how these little issues, that are small in the greater context, become magnified once success becomes the expectation--with Deep Deuce really rolling and filling in right now, an issue like connecting Oklahoma comes up because you have to get around to dotting the i's and so forth. Small details make all the difference, too.

    Obviously right now the residents can just walk through the wild savannah that separates Deep Deuce and Bricktown, even though it is unsightly to have between our two best districts, but in the future this WILL be the HSR corridor if it is going to happen at all. There is no other way to connect downtown to Tulsa unless you drop the hub down to the river or connect Edmond instead, and then require people to take commuter rail to get downtown.

  19. #419

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Quote Originally Posted by BG918 View Post
    Is there any movement to eventually have Oklahoma extended south from NE 2 to Main? It likely would have to be a bridge like Walnut so the abandoned tracks could be used again someday (possibly HSR to Tulsa). Oklahoma is already a main corridor through Bricktown and could be the same in Deep Deuce, especially since it connects to NE 10.
    Didn't the proposal have HSR going through Edmond, so at most it could be used by the regional rail system, in which case a bridge may not be necessary depending on number of routes and frequency to NE OKC and areas east of OKC.

  20. #420

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    I would think you would build the bridge so you don't limit your options in the future. As more things get built in Deep Deuce I think there will be more momentum to have another connection, in this case a bridge similar to the Walnut bridge, into Bricktown. Especially if Oklahoma ends up being the first at-grade intersection of the new boulevard from the east.

  21. #421

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Quote Originally Posted by BG918 View Post
    I would think you would build the bridge so you don't limit your options in the future. As more things get built in Deep Deuce I think there will be more momentum to have another connection, in this case a bridge similar to the Walnut bridge, into Bricktown. Especially if Oklahoma ends up being the first at-grade intersection of the new boulevard from the east.
    We are still a long way out from having any metro wide rail routes and that may not even be used in the earlier routes. Depending on how much surface & utility work is needed a road would cost a few hundred thousand to a several hundred thousand dollars for two blocks, a bridge that size is at least 10 million; this spent where in the short term may not have any train traffic under it until it needs repairs which could slow momentum as that money could have be put to encouraging developers to the area, plus a bridge tends to be less 'walkable' as far as peoples preferences vs being on the ground. It would not be hard to convert it to a bridge later it the rail volume becomes high enough if would be a hardship to crossing and the area keeps building densely since the money could then be funded by the downtown TIF district.

  22. Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Quote Originally Posted by BG918 View Post
    I would think you would build the bridge so you don't limit your options in the future. As more things get built in Deep Deuce I think there will be more momentum to have another connection, in this case a bridge similar to the Walnut bridge, into Bricktown. Especially if Oklahoma ends up being the first at-grade intersection of the new boulevard from the east.
    I think something east of that would be the first one?

  23. #423

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
    Didn't the proposal have HSR going through Edmond, so at most it could be used by the regional rail system, in which case a bridge may not be necessary depending on number of routes and frequency to NE OKC and areas east of OKC.
    nope the HSR will go from OKC to tulsa .. not through edmond

  24. #424

    Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    It's real simple, HSR is a long way away if it ever comes. However, that is indeed the corridor and no it HSR is not proposed to go through Edmond.

    That corridor is important in the very near term as to provide potential commuter rail service to the NE side, special event trans to the Adventure District, and direct connection to Tinker AFB.

    The trestle structure itself, while not all that aesthetically pleasing, is structurally sound and could theoretically be used with little improvement thus tying these lines to the NE and E to Santa Fe Station and the N/S rail corridor.

    Regarding the pedestrian intersection at Oklahoma, it would probably be a normal grade crossing only for pedestrians. A street type crossing would require, signals, bells, and potentially having teh train blow its horn. So, my guess is taht residents would probably only want a pedestrian crossing.

    Regarding HSR and how it affects this- HSR often uses standard commuter tracks and interacts with other trains when it is in the city. It is only when its leaves the city zone that many of them go into a grade separated and isolated track. There are extreme examples in new systems, but more than likely any HSR in OKC would interact and share local track until emerging outside of the city. At least this is how it is often done in Europe.

    So the Deep Deuce Oklahoma Ave crossing is likely to not be all that unusual in any circumstance. The only unusual infrastructure might potential be a stop for the Tinker line or Adventure line thus enabling a dedicated connection for Tinker Commuters and an easy way to get to Santa Fe Station from the area.

  25. Default Re: Level Urban Apartments

    "Aesthetically pleasing" is subjective. I think OKC is seriously lacking in physical connections to our past, and that one is pretty cool. Landscaping around and some up-lighting or lighting on the trestle structure itself could change the visual impact for (almost literally) pocket change. I'd personally rather see it highlighted than hidden or demolished.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 12 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Urban Neighbors July Social & Urban Bike Ride Info
    By Misty in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-13-2007, 03:15 PM
  2. More canal-level bridges needed
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-26-2005, 12:55 PM
  3. Education Level
    By Midtowner in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-20-2005, 09:12 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO