would love to bury the power lines ... at least in the urban core ..
would love to bury the power lines ... at least in the urban core ..
Their working on that. It will take around 4 years.
http://www.kfor.com/news/local/kfor-...,7162389.story
The city will focus on these busy intersections:
January 2011: Meridian-Reno to Will Rogers Parkway
March-May 2011: NW Expressway-Piedmont Road to Classen Curve
June-July 2011: Classen Blvd.- NW 39th to SW 4th
August-October 2011: Shields Blvd-SE 23rd to SE 89th
November 2011-January 2012: MLK-Millwood High School Drive to California
Over the next four years, the city will synchronize every traffic light.
We have something like half a billion for road improvements included in the 2007 bond issue, so they are working on it.
Same with sidewalks (as roads are widened, they are adding them in).
Then there is the massive redoing of everything within the Project 180
Will see the results of Project 180 on a more immediate basis, the bond projects can easily take 10 years before they are completed. Also, if there is a specific project that you are interested in, keep on the City to make sure it gets done. A few years ago (before the 2007 bond vote) there was an audit and they discovered that there were projects going back 3 previous bond issues (and up to 18 years at the time) of projects that had never been completed or started.
Cleveland and Canadian, if they want to be included in rail, will need to at least match the tax rate in Oklahoma county if not more. Consider that a line out to Yukon or Moore/Norman almost entirely benefits those areas. A penny tax in Canadian County doesn't generate even close to as much as it generates in Oklahoma County.
Bomber: You sound like a perfect candidate for abandoning your car, given all the stress the roads seem to give you. I would encourage you to take the plunge and be among the first in OKC to live car-free once it becomes viable.
I think OKC would also receive a fair amount of benefit from it. It would encourage people to visit downtown OKC for either work or pleasure and would allow people living downtown to get to the suburbs. It might also encourage more companies to locate downtown if they know it will be easy for their employees to make the commute (no parking issues).
I would LOVE to not have to drive. If i could hop on a train and ride in to the office, I would be the first one in line. Trouble for someone like me though, it's only a 15minute commute right now....hard to beat that.
When I was talking MARTA to the airport in Atlanta I used to think the same thing. The train ride was an hour and I could make the drive in 30 minutes. However, there was a 0% chance someone talking on their cell phone was going to rear-end me on the train. Also, parking was free at the MARTA station.
Kerry, my daughter was on the road an hour and 45 minutes at rush hour, getting from the Perimeter Mall to the University exit on 285. I believe it's 19 miles. MARTA for her was a 30 minute train ride. It took us a couple of years to convince her to use MARTA but once she did she was hooked.
Traffic in OKC continues to increase in volume. If I happen to be on the Broadway Extension at evening rush hour, I get off at 23rd St., because it can take an extra 10 minutes to get to the 6th St. exit. I assume it's from traffic trying to get onto I-40 and people merging to access I-35 to Moore and Norman. The nights of Thunder games it gets even worse. That is the opposite direction of what you would expect traffic to be at its worst at rush hour, so I'm guessing as you're heading north on the Broadway Extension traffic is bad as well at rush hour. I think taking the train, once there is mass transit such as a streetcar to move people away from the hub, will become a popular option for people driving north and south especially.
Many of the projects mentioned here (repaving roads, burrying power lines, etc.) are typically handled with bond issues, and are not really what MAPS is after.
For MAPS I'd consider projects like:
1. More Oklahoma River improvements
2. Expand commuter rail from the downtown transit hub
3. MAPS for Parks- many of our parks could use some serious work
4. More sidewalks - again could be handled with a bond issue. Problem with the current plan is that it only covers major streets that are being resurfaced, not neighborhood streets where we need the sidewalks.
5. Likely will need some upgrades to the Bricktown Ballpark
6. Expand the Bricktown Canal - hopefully by this time, space on the present canal will be maxed out and near capacity
I'd say that a new arena is many years down the line. If it is considered, I would replace the Cox Center with a new arena for the Thunder, and the old OKC Arena could be used for minor league hockey and events like the Big XII women's basketball tournament.
Also, I don't think a football stadium will come to fruition. There's zero chance of OKC getting an NFL team.
Like Kerry, I'd look into car racing. Maybe a NASCAR track. Or something to replace what we lost when the grand stand was demolished.
This last one had a bit more controversial project mix in few were sold on the biggest ticket item but liked some of the smaller ones. Their is no doubt still things we will need to improve. By the time we have the current capital collected, they should be able to prepare a compelling follow up plan.
Think the Mayor is of the same sentiment (and expressed so publicly) But he has said he has attempted the NASCAR thing and it just ain't happenin' either (think this came up during the Council meetings and the Grand Prix discussions...that it was significantly cheaper for the City to "build" the Grand Prix" raceway than to construct a full blown stadium for NFL or NASCAR.
Don't even bring up the destroyed Fairgrounds speedway. Actually cost the City more to bull doze it than to make the needed electrical improvements that they used for justification. For all of Cornett's professed lip service to the Speedway folks, to not have a replacement in place was....
Amen
You can forget NASCAR. However, there are multiple other racing circuits that would be better.
Couple of quick thoughts on projects, but I skeptical as to if it would pass given latest issues. And before you ask me where you get my numbers from, they are simply estimates.
1. 30,000 person open air stadium with a track on the inside that could host high school football games, track meets, concerts, etc. ($200 million)
2. Expansion of the transit hub to include part of the Cox Convention Center (considering the new convention center will be under construction or built by that time) ($100 million)
3. Expansion of the streetcar and bus lines and an upgrade of all buses to natural gas. ($250 million)
4. Bricktown canal extension to at least the Myriad Gardens. ($75 million)
5. Light rail N/S from DT to city limits ($375 million)
That would be a Billion dollar plan. The MAPS 3 plan calls for $777 million over 7.75 years or $8.4 million per month. Increasing that to an average of $10 million per month, it would be an 8.5 year plan.
Fine, but either find a use for the other 80% of the time (hmmmm how often is the Ballpark used when off season?) Or at least have a replacement venue built before you destroy the old one. Would you destroy the Cox when the new Convention Center hasn't been built yet? No.
Yeah, I had no idea. I would think a bare bones stadium with concessions, bathrooms and that is about it wouldn't be too bad, but wasn't sure. Even if you made it $50 million (ten years from now) that would make the total amount $850 million which would take 7.5 years and would leave enough for contingency purposes.
Warren,
Course the inherent problem with building it "bare bones" (that some keep insisting was done with the Ford), is that you have to go back and the taxpayer ends up picking up the tab to pay for what they were told they were getting and should have been done from the beginning (at a higher cost later)
When I lived in Denver I took the RTD train to work downtown everyday. I biked a half mile from my apt to the station, getting there usually 5 min. before the train was scheduled to leave. If I got there too late I had to ride a significantly fuller train and it was difficult especially with a bike. The ride itself was 15 min. with stops. Once at the station I then biked a quarter mile to my office. From leaving my house to arriving at the office took me about 30 min. and that was if I got to the station on time and the train was on time. When I made the drive it was about 20 min. so a little better but not much, and the traffic going into downtown was always heavy. Denver also has a lot of bikers and they weave in and out of traffic so it can be nerve-wracking driving around downtown. My office was also located on the outskirts of downtown so I could park in the neighborhood for free; if I was in the CBD there would be ZERO free parking and many employers won't pay for it either. It would've been easier if I didn't have the bike and lived closer to the light rail station, and if I left earlier so I could actually sit down and read my emails, the morning news on my phone, listen to music, etc. With a bike I always had to stand up for that 15 min. ride and the train was packed. Just my experience with public transit...
Do we know that for a fact? How profitable is it when it sits empty and unused? If it is profitable, why are the new owners tarping off 4,000 seats? The race track can be profitable too. Just takes the right mix of venue, operators etc to make it happen. One of the reasons Bennett gave for not paying for his own arena, he doesn't think they can be run at a profit, so he wanted the City to shoulder that burden. Even though the Ford has been run at an operational profit.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Bookmarks