I guess I don't get it, then how can New Jersey implement a "casino district" and we can't?
http://www.philly.com/philly/busines...ght_bills.html[/QU
Oklahoma could implement a "casino district" if it legalized non-indian gambling like New Jersey, Missouri, Nevada, and Mississippi, and a few other states have. The development of Indian gaming in Oklahoma and nationally is somewhat shady in my opinion. Tribal gaming in Oklahoma was originally based the concept of "charitable bingo" which non-tribes can participate in. The tribes figured out they could have slot machines called class II gaming devices if they based the outcome of the game on bingo. They later started offering poker and blackjack because they are "games of skill" instead of games of chance. The state question a few years ago which made an exception to Oklahoma gambling law by allowing Remington Park Racetrack which was not owned by a tribe at that time to have class III gaming devices allowed tribal casinos to have blackjack although that part of the question was not publicized in the advertising I saw promoting the question. The state allows tribes to have class III slot machines if they enter into a compact with the state to pay taxes on the class III games.
The tribes have always pushed the envelope as far as the law is concerned. I think Roulette and craps are supposed to be illegal in Oklahoma but some tribes are getting around the law by offering the games with cards. Some recommend since we have so many casinos in the state, legalize full blown Las Vegas style casinos with games of chance like Roulette, Craps, and Keno and let non-tribal entities compete with the tribes. So far, the tribes have a monoploy on casino gambling in Oklahoma because they are being operated for a "charitable purpose" based on my limited understanding of the law on the issue. New Jersey has non-indian gaming in Atlantic City. That is why they have a casino district.
Bigray in Ok
Bookmarks