Originally Posted by
Rover
Not to be controversial, but neighborhoods develop and have distinct character based on similarities of residents, not on diversity. Diversity is broader. I'm not talking about ghettos, but the distinctiveness say in New York City is that you have the Italian neighborhood with great ethnic restaurants, festivals, etc. It started with immigrants in the tenant buildings. You have Chinatown. You have the meatpacking district. You have Soho, the Village, etc. Each has distinction, difference and character. You have uptown and downtown, Park Avenue and Harlem. All are wonderful in their own way. It is not about throwing everything together in one big oleo and expecting a cultural big-bang. When we talk about diversity, it doesn't mean on the same street, but in the same town. It is both tolerance and encouragement. But it doesn't mean everything gets mixed together so that there is no real definition and no real spice. This is why Dallas is much less interesting than Chicago, or even Pittsburg or St. Louis. You cannot throw water, flower, sugar, a slab of meat, a couple of ears of corn and a few eggs all into one bowl, mix it together and have a 5 course meal. Each dish is prepared separately and relished altogether with each course of the meal complementing the other, not becoming part of one dish.
When you throw everything together the market is so fragmented that it is hard for anything to survive because the scale of each is so small.
Bookmarks