Widgets Magazine
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33

Thread: 164th and North May Construction

  1. #1

    Default 164th and North May Construction

    Does anyone know what they are building on the Southeast corner? Looks like a fast food place with drive thru windows. I also heard they were building an OnCue on the corner also. Does anyone know?

  2. #2

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Should have done this first. County Assessor shows it owned by Onyx. They are building a McDonalds.

  3. #3

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Did you notice the corner lot is owned by Walgreen Co? This intersection is going to be very busy.

  4. #4

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Wow...a McDonalds, a gas station and a Walgreen's! What a fantastic array of throw-away retail. I bet you have to go at least 2 miles to find any of those things. Seriously, is there even one intersection in the "new" NW OKC that is not overserved by such establishments? Is there any thought given to zoning at all? Sorry for the rant... in a bad mood, I guess.

  5. #5

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    I couldn't find anything about Walgrens on the assesssor site. Did I overlook something?
    Last edited by okc_bel_air; 02-09-2010 at 12:32 AM. Reason: found it

  6. #6

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    That intersection is surrounded by housing additions. What else is supposed to into that area trendy night clubs, clothing boutiques and sushi bars?

    For every person complaining about fast food, gas stations and chain drug stores there will be a 100 people behind them handing over their money knocking the Nimby complainer out of the way landing them in the next county.

    McDonalds and OnCue have done fairly nice buildings with nice landscaping recently so they deserve a little credit. On the other hand if Starbucks or was moving in I bet you would be planning a party.

  7. #7

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    OneforOne, you completely misunderstand my post. I am not suggesting that any of the things you mention be placed there. I'm not an idiot. It's the suburbs. I understand that. It's not about forcing it to be upscale. It's about a theory of development that says there should be retail on every corner. In OKC there seems to be more vacancy than is necessary, and if commercial development were zoned, say, to Memorial Road and Edmond Road, for example, there may be a drug store for every 2000 residents rather than for every 1000 residents, and would that be such a bad thing? I don't fault the landowners for selling their land, but it does look tacky. A Starbucks on every corner would also look tacky.

  8. #8

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Quote Originally Posted by oneforone View Post
    That intersection is surrounded by housing additions. What else is supposed to (I'm guessing the word 'go' goes here) into that area trendy night clubs, clothing boutiques and sushi bars?

    For every person complaining about fast food, gas stations and chain drug stores there will be a (huh?) 100 people behind them handing over their money knocking the Nimby complainer out of the way landing them in the next county.

    McDonalds and OnCue have done fairly nice buildings with nice landscaping recently so they deserve a little credit. On the other hand if Starbucks or (did you have a bad case of the Monday's brain fart here? Starbucks or (fill in the blank)) was moving in I bet you would be planning a party.
    Sorry, just really hard to read your sentence and make sense out of it...

  9. #9

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCisOK4me View Post
    Sorry, just really hard to read your sentence and make sense out of it...
    You are trying to disregard what he means by picking apart his grammar -- so it would appear he doesn't have a worthwhile opinion. I don't agree with what he typed, but I can understand it fully. If you can't understand his intent, you are a moran, not him.

    To answer him, yes, a sushi bar would be nice. A coffee shop would be nice. A wine bar. A cafe. A farmers market stand. A toy store. A Something that those households would enjoy *walking* to and mixing among the other patrons. What we don't need is the same block that up a mile up the street. They have a simcity mentality, just cut and paste the same block over and over and over... Sure it works, but it doesn't add a ton of real value to the city. It adds a ton to their bottom line though.

  10. #10

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    McDonald's opened up today. Very nice inside.

  11. #11

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Quote Originally Posted by redrunner View Post
    McDonald's opened up today. Very nice inside.
    Yeah. Just what this state needs, another McDonald's.

  12. #12

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Quote Originally Posted by FritterGirl View Post
    Yeah. Just what this state needs, another McDonald's.
    While your at it I have some spilled milk you can cry over.....



  13. Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    It's supposed to be an upscale prototype McD's.

  14. Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    It's supposed to be an upscale prototype McD's.
    Ooooo! I bet it's got the flat screens you can watch while you eat your fries! When is it we have enough fast food restaurants?

  15. #15

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    It is quite upscale. Think IKEA meets McDonalds. The finishes and design elements are certainly premium. The only thing that's typical like other McDonald's is the food.

  16. #16

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Quote Originally Posted by FritterGirl View Post
    Yeah. Just what this state needs, another McDonald's.
    Guess you should have bought the land and done something else with it huh? People bitching all the time cracks me up.

  17. #17

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    The silly thing to me is that there is a McDonalds 3 miles away at 164th/15th and Santa Fe.

  18. #18

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    There's one closer at the 14000 block of N. Penn. Would have liked to see a Chick-Fil-A go there but McDonald's will suffice. I wonder when Walgreens is going to start construction next door.

  19. #19

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    "If you can't understand his intent, you are a moran, not him."

    A 'moran'. That's great, lol.. Completely forgot I posted on this thread but thanks for the top laugh of my day. Love it... Moran.. Hahahaha

  20. #20

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnDenver View Post
    . They have a simcity mentality, just cut and paste the same block over and over and over... Sure it works, but it doesn't add a ton of real value to the city. It adds a ton to their bottom line though.
    Who is they? Are you talking about the developers? What else would you expect if that is the case. They are in the business of making money. If they are meeting business zoning requirements you can't regulate whether a a McDonalds or a sushi bar is built. If they can maximize their profits with more upscale businesses I'm sure they will do that. While there may be a few instances of major intersections without business development that will always be rare. Who wants to own a house abutted to a major intersection?

  21. #21

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Quote Originally Posted by redrunner View Post
    There's one closer at the 14000 block of N. Penn. Would have liked to see a Chick-Fil-A go there but McDonald's will suffice. I wonder when Walgreen's is going to start construction next door.
    If theres a Walgreen's at this intersection, it's just a matter time before they start construction of a CVS on the nearest vacant lot.

  22. #22

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    JibJab- I hear what you are saying. I really do. But by 4-laning every road in sight, they have turned every intersection into a major intersection. If it had been planned differently, you could have had neighborhood collector roads that could have remained 2-lanes and commercial development targeted to specific places. Until recently, 150th and Western was a neighborhood sort of intersection that wasn't pockmarked with sprawlish development. I hate to keep going back to St. Louis, but it's what I know. In the west county suburbs, you have commercial strips every 3 miles or so, and in between are 2 land neighborhood roads that only carry the traffic of the neighborhoods along them. The commercial strips are dense and viable with a ton of intersting uses because they draw from a slightly wider area and there is very little vacancy. And the neighborhood streets are asthetically pleasing with homes and maybe churches. What happens when everything becomes a major intersection is that there just isn't enough development to spread around and you get cookie cutter fast food or lots that stay vacant for 5 or 10 years. In my personal opinion, it's just not that pleasing. But it does make money for somebody I suppose.

  23. #23

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Contributing to the density will be a widening of the Kilpatrick Turnpike from 4 to 6 lanes between Portland/LHP east to either Broadway or I-35 (forgot which highway was the eastern extent of the widening).

    This will bring all of the "charm" of Penn & JKT over to May Avenue.

  24. #24

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    I don't understand why they think they have to widen the turnpike to 6 lanes. A. There is very little traffic on it to begin with and B. The service road and turnarounds is what needs the attention. There is way more traffic snarls on memorial than the turnpike.

  25. #25

    Default Re: 164th and North May Construction

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCTalker View Post
    Contributing to the density will be a widening of the Kilpatrick Turnpike from 4 to 6 lanes between Portland/LHP east to either Broadway or I-35 (forgot which highway was the eastern extent of the widening).

    This will bring all of the "charm" of Penn & JKT over to May Avenue.
    Had not heard about this...sounds like the turnpike authority has lots of money to throw around?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. new edmond highway
    By metro in forum Suburban & Other OK Communities
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-17-2006, 07:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO