Re: SI's Chris Ballard paints a rather unflattering portrait of OKC
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
dismayed
You know that is a real problem... one short random trip and you're likely to see some unpleasant parts of the city. That should not be the case. This is the result of horrible, horrible planning for decades on the part of this city. For example, you come in from the west on I-40 and what's the first thing you see... a trash heap. You come in from the east on I-240 and what's the first thing you see... Mount Trashmore. You come in from the north on I-35 and what's the first thing you smell... the new Edmond city dump. You come in from the south and what's the first thing you smell at I-35 and 34th Street... the Moore City Dump. How about driving through the heart of our downtown in OKC on the central west side... is that an RC park, trailer homes, or both? These are gigantic planning mistakes. Virtually all of the high visibility, easily accessible real estate in this metropolitan area is blanketed with bad choices like the above, or horribly unattractive corrugated metal structures housing industrial businesses, or car lots.
I love this city but we need to take a hard look at it. It's not pretty. It's getting better, but it isn't happening fast enough. Hold your politicians and local business leaders accountable.
The first thing you see when approaching Dallas from Houston are not one, but two trash mountains.
And in Houston, the blighted stretches along I-45 North and the Hardy Tollroad go for MILES, and I don't mean just run down properties, I'm talking blocks and blocks of rotted shacks as seen along the Hardy.
Does that mean OKC should take the back seat? Absolutely not. Just because OKC has turned in a good direction doesn't mean pre-MAPS OKC can just simply vanish without a trace. Transformation can only happen as fast as the market allows.
Continue the Renaissance!!!
Bookmarks