
Originally Posted by
betts
The problem, as I see it, is that we don't really have enough information to assess who is "right" and who is "wrong" in your interactions with the city. To be perfectly honest with you, the word "union" always makes me suspicious that I'm paying too much. What is a fair salary, what are fair hours, etc. aren't easy things for us to understand. There are almost always two sides to every argument, and the truth is usually somewhere in between.
As I've said before, I have serious questions about the emergency response service the fire department has, and, looking at what other cities have done in reaction to the same problem, I think there might be alternate ways to address the problem. So then, my question is, does the fire department really need an extra 200 employees?
I agree that it's essential that we have good city services. Sometimes there's a disconnect, like there always is in life, between what we want and what we need. I cannot bring myself to assume a union knows what we need, so, I'm going to have to say that as an individual, I don't have enough data to know which side is definitely the right one, especially where the firemen are concerned. But, I'm willing to learn more and be educated. Again, I'm not saying you're wrong, simply saying I cannot be sure you're right. However, if we're going to be voting on this issue, I will make sure I learn everything I can. That's as much of an olive branch as I'm willing to extend.
Bookmarks