Clearly, you have no idea where I have or havent lived or driven. I lived in Dallas for 13 years from 86 to 2000 and in Denver for the next 8. The wealthy parts of Dallas and the wealthy suburbs have better roads because they passed a $1 billion bond issue a while back and made the road standard in the metroplex a 6-lane wide, concrete roadway. The energy and tech booms that Dallas benefitted from have also given the city money to build better roads. However, go to the poor parts of town and the side streets and roads don't benefit from this wealth of money and are no better than here.
Denver, on the other hand has worse roads than OKC by a long shot. Weather plays a large part and the fact they still cling to the use of asphalt the way we do. However, the weather in Denver is far harder on the roads than it is here so they decay faster. I just spent a week in KC about 4 months ago and had a chance to drive around there. They have a better highway system than we do but there roads are, overall, no better than here. Asphalt, potholes all over some roads, rocks on many of them which the bikers wouldn't like.
I was in Omaha a month ago and the roads were no different than here other than they were inadequately wide in most areas. Omaha apparently doesn't like 4 lane roads.
You want to talk about bad roads? Go to NYC or Boston.
Chicago I cant speak for.
The problem is that you all live here and you see every road in every part of town and simply feel the roads are worse. The city has passed a large bond issue in 2007 and something like $300 million in road improvements are included. There will be plenty of road work once that gets underway. The delay has been the financial crisis and trying to get the bonds underwritten so they can be sold.
Bookmarks