A member of the Downtown Bicycle Club recently told me that the City is Dull.
A member of the Downtown Bicycle Club recently told me that the City is Dull.
Wow! really! O.K. thats it, I'm moving now! if the DBC say's DT sucks,well I cant take it anymore!
shame OKC doesn't have a provision for a passle of free range rotweillers included in MAPs 3. That could liven things up for the peddlers.
Hahahahaha!!
Did you tell them you think the DT Bicycle Club is dull?
If only you knew what the Downtown OKC Bridge Club thought... it's very, very demoralizing.
There's a Downtown Bicycle Club? Do they have an online application form? Do I need a proposer and a couple of seconders? How long is the waiting list and how much is the initiation fee? (And is it - you know - restricted?)
First rule of Downtown Bicycle Club...you do not talk about Downtown Bicycle Club.
-Chris-
I heard from a anonymous source that the Edmond Bicycle Squad was much more "hip".
Maybe they need to start working together collectively to make things FUN for themselves, a la Critical Mass in SF.
2,000+ cyclists getting together the last Friday of each month in "celebration" of bikes sharing the road. As much as a pain as it can be for drivers, it is a sight to behold. Here are some pics from the 2008 Halloween Ride (oh, to be there for it tonight!)
Halloween Critical Mass, San Francisco, 10/31/08: photos and video : Indybay
lol @ critical mass. Im thinking alley cat race.
Well, since you all insisted....
"It is illegal to behave deliberately in such a way as to try to give spurious information to the opponents. For example if you have only one card of a suit that is led, it is illegal to hesitate before playing it, creating the impression that you had more than one card to choose from. (Even an inadvertent hesitation would be an offence, though a less serious one, if it misled the opponents to your benefit, and the director would adjust the score to give a fair result.) On the other hand there is no ban on making deceptive bids and plays to confuse the opponents - as long as these are not part of an undisclosed partnership agreement. You are free for example to play a card different from what might be expected from your holding, as long as you do it smoothly and without comment. Similarly you are free to make a bid which is inconsistent with your system to upset the opposition, provided that this is as much of a surprise to your partner as it is to the opponents."
haha...i actually got a kick out of reading this thread.
It's my experience the same rules are used by elected officials in deciding when or when not to provide an honest answer during an interview.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks