Re: Another NYT Thunder article
I think we need to go on there and 'educate' New Yorkers about OKC.
While OKC may NEVER match up to NY (I think ONLY Chicago can), but that does not mean OKC is bad or 'hick'. All of this talk about small and farm is simply elitist, to make themselves feel superiour. Yet, I hope every time NY is in OKC that the Thunder beat the hell out of them - to force NY media to paint the proper picture of OKC; that it is a medium sized yet rapidly growing and progressive South Central city complete with suburbs and all of that big city stuff too, including skyscrapers (had them since the 1930's).
I recall a NY article about OKC's chinatown (which was actually well written) but ringed me when the guy said OKC had a few highrises that you could hop over. Um, excuse me but OKC has a very dense and nice skyline and not every NY skyscraper are that much taller than OKC's.
That being said, we probably will NEVER change NY's attitude until they actually VISIT Oklahoma City and WE show them the progressive city WE ARE. I get so irritated when I arrive in OKC and some backward a$$ person tells me that I should have gone to Dallas because OKC is just OK. Luckily, the city is having less and less of those people who put the city down constantly comparing it to a metro almost 6 times larger.
Maybe we could learn from Milwaukee (who sits closer to an EVEN bigger metro in Chicago). Yet, it seems MKE holds their own, and even many CHI people stand up for MKE. I can start to see DFW people stand up for OKC a little bit but we really need to continue to fight for our city and educate people that OKC is not nor never has been, a backwater farm town.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Bookmarks