Widgets Magazine
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36

Thread: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

  1. Default Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    The section I am asking about is I-35 between the I-44 junction and I-40 juction.

    I have been thinking about this for months now because I drive it a few times a week.

    Why is it so run down? As a major north-south highway, why is it still only 4 lanes and in crappy condition. I know projects have priority over another and the highway isn't in a real plush part of town, but it should be at least 6-8 lanes.

    Anyone know what the deal is?

    ok I'm done ranting now.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    agreed

  3. #3

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    I'm signing the petition too. This is a petition, right?

  4. #4

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Interesting, I was just thinking of starting a thread similar to this. With that being a major corridor through the metro, I think there should be some kind of beautification project for it. Most of it is industrialized and is an eyesore. With this and I-40 (which is getting a makeover) being OKC's front porch, I think we should have more "curb appeal" as travelers from other states motor through our metro. If drivers don't see an astheticly pleasing city they'll be less likely to stop off for the night.

  5. Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    One at a time, gang...

  6. #6

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    ...but one at a time, at the current pace, means we won't see the finalized improvements until the year 2525. For the record, Zager and Evans considered using the OKC roads as a storyline in one of the verses, but felt the other predictions were more capable of becoming true.
    ...this shortest straw has been pulled for you

  7. Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Just about all of the property from NE 36th north to the 44 junc, on the west side of 35 belongs to the city. I think the east side is actually Forest Park.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Quote Originally Posted by AFCM View Post
    ...but one at a time, at the current pace, means we won't see the finalized improvements until the year 2525. For the record, Zager and Evans considered using the OKC roads as a storyline in one of the verses, but felt the other predictions were more capable of becoming true.
    Did Messrs. Zager and Evans also consider as a storyline the PITA that is cleaning Coke off of a flat-panel LCD?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,457
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Wouldn't that mostly be a federal issue, or at least wouldn't most of the money come from the feds?

    My first guess as to why it isn't getting attention right now is that, as bad as it could get, most of it won't fall down. A lot of the country's infrastructure is in a bad way and I think major bridges will get money first.

  10. Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    As AFCM had said... One at a time.... All eyes on the Devon Tower.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Quote Originally Posted by traxx View Post
    Interesting, I was just thinking of starting a thread similar to this. With that being a major corridor through the metro, I think there should be some kind of beautification project for it. Most of it is industrialized and is an eyesore. With this and I-40 (which is getting a makeover) being OKC's front porch, I think we should have more "curb appeal" as travelers from other states motor through our metro. If drivers don't see an astheticly pleasing city they'll be less likely to stop off for the night.
    My bad, as I reread this thread I realize I misread. I was thinking about I-35 between I-40 and I-240. As far as that goes my statement stands.

    As far as the statements of "one at a time; focus on the devon tower now" are concerned, why can't we focus on more than one thing at a time. Does that mean that when the devon tower starts construction they should stop working on the new crosstown because we are only able of focusing on one thing at a time. If we'd had that philosophy during maps then we still wouldn't be finished with maps.

  12. Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Quote Originally Posted by AFCM View Post
    ...but one at a time, at the current pace, means we won't see the finalized improvements until the year 2525. For the record, Zager and Evans considered using the OKC roads as a storyline in one of the verses, but felt the other predictions were more capable of becoming true.
    Are you kidding me? I think they're screaming up and down 235 considering the area they're dealing with and traffic, etc. We're moving all of I-40, we're widening 235...I mean, what more do you want?

  13. #13

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Not to mention turnpike construction & expansion to the north and west...

  14. #14

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCMallen View Post
    One at a time, gang...

    Thats the line of thinking that will always keep Oklahoma with crappy roads...I bet in other states they may occasionally work on more than one thing at a time...

  15. #15

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Not to mention turnpike construction & expansion to the north and west...
    what expansion is this?

  16. #16

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Quote Originally Posted by sgt. pepper View Post
    what expansion is this?
    I think he was referring to the 'when the turpike had been expanded' five or so years ago.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCMallen View Post
    One at a time, gang...
    ARAGORN (cont'd)
    There is still hope for Frodo. He needs
    time and safe passage across the Plains of
    Gorgoroth. We can give him that.

    GANDALF
    How?

    ARAGORN
    Draw out Sauron' s armies - empty his lands.
    Then we gather our full strength and march
    on the Black Gate.

    At this, GIMLI CHOKES on his pipe . . . EOMER steps forward.

    EOMER
    We cannot achieve victory from strength of
    arms .

    ARAGORN
    Not for ourselves . . . But we can give Frodo
    his chance if we keep Sauron' s eye fixed
    upon us. Keep him blind to all else that
    moves .

    LEGOLAS
    A diversion . . .

    CLOSE ON: GANDALF speaks in a low tone to ARAGORN . . .

    GANDALF
    (doubtful)
    Sauron will suspect a trap. He will not
    take the bait!

    GIMLI
    Certainty of death. Small chance of
    success. What are we waiting for?

  18. Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    They are doing some repaving finally. The inside lanes had been repaved when I drove up there a week or so ago.

  19. Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Quote Originally Posted by hipsterdoofus View Post
    Thats the line of thinking that will always keep Oklahoma with crappy roads...I bet in other states they may occasionally work on more than one thing at a time...
    It's a phrase. I fyou really think OKC is only working on one highway at a time, you are completely ignorant, but luckily, you're in the right place on OKCTalk to catch up fast!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,457
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    I bet in other states they may occasionally work on more than one thing at a time
    Seriously?

    There's maybe 5 different routes I can take to work and there's not one of them that isn't being worked on.

  21. #21

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCMallen View Post
    Are you kidding me? I think they're screaming up and down 235 considering the area they're dealing with and traffic, etc. We're moving all of I-40, we're widening 235...I mean, what more do you want?
    Well, as usual, reading comprehension would come in handy when trying to understand the context of my post.

    First of all, I wasn't saying ODOT was fixing roads one at a time. As a piggyback to a previous post, I was simply saying that one at a time would take forever, considering each project takes several years to complete.

    Okay, so PORTIONS of I-235 and I-40 are under construction. Seeing as how those small portions of interstate take YEARS to complete, you can see how repairing the THOUSANDS of miles of deteriorated roads in Oklahoma City would take an unusually long time, making me skeptical of seeing any real city-wide progress in our lifetime.

    Groundbreaking for the I-40 relocation project took place in May of 2002. If we're lucky, the new crosstown will be completed in 2012 -- if we're lucky. This FOUR MILE stretch of interstate will have taken 10 years from groundbreaking to completion IF everything goes well. Now, I don't know when the I-235 construction project started, but I know it was underway a year ago. Considering the I-235 project is only a mile, maybe two miles long, we're looking at some unreasonably long projects.

    What more do I want? Fix the I-240/I-35 exit/entrance and widen I-35 south of I-240. Complete the NW Expressway and N May mess that started well over a year ago. Start working on the declining I-44/Belle Isle overpass. Patch up the thousands of holes all throughout the city's streets. These are some of the things I want, but as mentioned, if done one at a time, will take forever.
    ...this shortest straw has been pulled for you

  22. Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Quote Originally Posted by AFCM View Post
    Well, as usual, reading comprehension would come in handy when trying to understand the context of my post.
    No need to be an asshole.

    First of all, I wasn't saying ODOT was fixing roads one at a time. As a piggyback to a previous post, I was simply saying that one at a time would take forever, considering each project takes several years to complete.

    Okay, so PORTIONS of I-235 and I-40 are under construction. Seeing as how those small portions of interstate take YEARS to complete, you can see how repairing the THOUSANDS of miles of deteriorated roads in Oklahoma City would take an unusually long time, making me skeptical of seeing any real city-wide progress in our lifetime.
    Of course it's portions at a time. I'm glad you don't work for ODOT. It would take ANY city with a normal amount of resources a long time to repairs these roads. What color is the sky on the planets you're posting from where cities have unlimited resources to magically fix everything all at once?


    Groundbreaking for the I-40 relocation project took place in May of 2002. If we're lucky, the new crosstown will be completed in 2012 -- if we're lucky. This FOUR MILE stretch of interstate will have taken 10 years from groundbreaking to completion IF everything goes well. Now, I don't know when the I-235 construction project started, but I know it was underway a year ago. Considering the I-235 project is only a mile, maybe two miles long, we're looking at some unreasonably long projects.
    First of all, show me what unreasonable is. We have to do these projects as money comes in...there's not some big, magic bank account with themoney to do all of this at once. You probably think oil comapnies are sitting on leases not drilling, too.

    The I-40 move is about as substantial as highway work comes unless you're building an extended stretch of elevated highway over an ocean or something. I mean, you're talking an inner-urban core movement of a freaking interstate. Remember how long it took to build the Kilpatrick? And that was in the suburbs and portions in unpopulated areas.

    What more do I want? Fix the I-240/I-35 exit/entrance and widen I-35 south of I-240. Complete the NW Expressway and N May mess that started well over a year ago. Start working on the declining I-44/Belle Isle overpass. Patch up the thousands of holes all throughout the city's streets. These are some of the things I want, but as mentioned, if done one at a time, will take forever.
    And again, it's a PHRASE. Nothing is being done one at a time, and no one ever even claimed the city works on these things one at a time. So really your point is moot. Or it's not moot, depending on which school you come from- the old or the new. I prefer old, so it's not moot.

  23. #23

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Turning your back is how you prepare to moon someone.

  24. Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    Quote Originally Posted by jsibelius View Post
    Turning your back is how you prepare to moon someone.
    OKCTalk sponsored event. The Moon Wave at the grand opening of the Devon Tower.

  25. #25

    Default Re: Why is OKC turning its back on I-35?

    And, if I'm not mistaken there are two projects going on 235 right now.

    1) 23rd - 36th area
    2) The interchange with Memorial Road

    and this will be followed up with the redo of the 235 I-44 interchange.

    We can't forget the work that happens up north.

    Just goes to show that more than one thing happens at a time.

    And, instead of fixing every problem all at once, I believe ODOT took the initiative to save some lives by installing cable barriers on almost every stretch of Interstate in Oklahoma.

    I'm glad I'm safe, but I'm really glad it limits the places those dang cops can hang out and radar.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Tulsa hates you.
    By CuatrodeMayo in forum Tulsa & Suburbs
    Replies: 223
    Last Post: 03-30-2009, 08:21 AM
  2. Sonics relocation terms
    By mranderson in forum Sports
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 05-27-2007, 10:45 PM
  3. Relocating to OKC..Good and Bad !
    By 6foot3 in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 04-26-2007, 06:25 PM
  4. "Will Rogers" - Inappropriate for an Airport?
    By writerranger in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 03-17-2007, 06:57 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO