Widgets Magazine
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

  1. #1

    Default OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    As if there hasn't been enough national press about OKC recently.....

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...#uslPageReturn

  2. Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    It's always good to be in the limelight.

  3. #3

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    Looks like we will be one of the pioneers of this stlye of project.

  4. Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    Nice article...

    Now if no one gets a hold of Sally's latest cry for attention, we'll be okay... How I hope she moves away.
    " You've Been Thunder Struck ! "

  5. #5

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    Another great article on OKC that joins a long list of free publicity we've been receiving. Even though some people in our state still have a negative opinion about our GREAT State, it makes me proud that people outside of our state recognize the progress that we are accomplishing and letting the world know about it. It's awesome we've had such a slew of great national press.

  6. #6

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    Great article. Agreed Karried, hopefully that financial company from San Francisco will still move here, I know they were thinking twice about it because of her comments.

  7. #7

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    I admire the tenor of the article from USA Today especially in that it doesn't imply that the "evict the highway" idea is the one-size-fits-all solution for everyone. It looks like cities are taking a very practical approach to their aging highways and making decisions that seem to benefit everyone, rather than being forced to adopt some unilateral solution devised by a nameless, faceless bureaucracy half a country away.

    Good pub for OKC!

  8. #8

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    Quote Originally Posted by metro View Post
    Great article. Agreed Karried, hopefully that financial company from San Francisco will still move here, I know they were thinking twice about it because of her comments.
    What financial company?

  9. Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    Should be neat to see it in the "trench"

  10. #10

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    It's funny, because I was initially against this idea, mainly because I loved the view of the skyline as people passed through.

    Now -- especially having walked that area south of I-40 -- I realize it's a great plan and will redevelop an area that is completely embarrassing.


    It's funny how public opinion turns... All the sudden, OKC is the model for all sorts of ideas and plans and citizens seem to have lots of confidence in those coming up will all these grandiose plans.

  11. #11

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    It is nice to see a positive spin on something we are doing!!

  12. #12

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    The idea of the highway being below ground level is a great idea. Keeps traffic noise at a minimum and hides 10 lanes of non attractive highway. I picture it being similar to 75 in dallas, a very well designed highway.

  13. #13

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    This was a nice classy article. I especially like the fact they didn't point out one of the real reasons for relocation..(the fact that I-40 is falling apart)

  14. #14

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    You guys should read the comments on this artlce from USA Today readers. Also, you guys need to recommend the article so more people can view it.

  15. Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    The "comments" link isn't a link....how do you see the comments?

  16. Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    Comments are at the bottom.

  17. #17

    Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    Quote Originally Posted by onthestrip View Post
    The idea of the highway being below ground level is a great idea. Keeps traffic noise at a minimum and hides 10 lanes of non attractive highway. I picture it being similar to 75 in dallas, a very well designed highway.
    I haven't seen the plans, but I sure hope they include a few of those managed HOV lanes. If we're going to be a "Big League City" then we might as well do it in the "fast Lane"

  18. Default Re: OKC Crosstown Article in USATODAY

    Great article, but the majority of the comments are anything but complementary.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Why I am voting No.
    By Kerry in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 342
    Last Post: 03-03-2008, 09:43 PM
  2. OKC Crosstown Hanging by a Thread
    By Tex in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-06-2007, 06:35 PM
  3. A Model For OKC
    By Kerry in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 06-28-2007, 08:26 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO