Oh please.
So if I take on a plaintiff's case and it is extremely challenging and complex and I end up getting a defense verdict, I ought to be able to expect the public to bail me out at the expense of public schools?
Why are developers so special in this regard? Why do they get to be unique in that their business model is backed up by the taxpayers? Are developers the only kinds of businesses that take risks?
It’s not about specific developers or whether they are somehow special or deserving. You have this incredibly twisted. It’s about what is a strategic need for the community, and what pushes the city forward and builds the overall tax base in the bargain.
Oklahoma City had multiple generations of disinvestment in its core and in areas like the Eastside, which has the added burden of institutional redlining for decades.
Try to get a conventional bank loan for commercial real estate in NE OKC. Try to build residential in the core. Try to develop much-needed and much-desired retail or mixed use in the core. Try to renovate a historic structure with environmental issues. But…only do so if your renovation can meet stringent design guidelines that don’t exist AT ALL in the suburbs. Try workforce housing. These things are virtually impossible without significant assistance.
Oklahoma City has spent the past 30 years trying to overcome the radical disinvestment that happened here for more than half a century preceding MAPS, and despite the progress we’ve made this city still has a long, long way to go to catch up. TIF is simply one of the most effective tools to assist in this effort. Your mind and the minds of some others on this site have simply become poisoned to this concept in part because undue and extreme negativity towards TIF here goes largely unchallenged.
^
Except the huge percentage of all private development has been done without any TIF whatsoever.
Everyone realizes something like First National or the Skirvin needs help.
I took this yesterday of Mesero; they still have a long way to go.
I bet they are pushing for spring.
![]()
1. Shake Shack progress
2. Rink being dismantled
3. RH Gallery windows going in
4. Mesero
![]()
Will Mesero have a patio? For some reason I was thinking the second floor was somewhat open air.
So is it sure that’s shake shack now?
Sign about to go up on Mesero. From the looks of things, they are moving fast now that the space is completely enclosed.
![]()
I guess Alo is not coming. Was there yesterday and everything that said Alo was covered over. A worker with an Oak badge said they were told in their morning huddle that the cancelled their lease.
My understanding is that Simon (Penn Square owner) found out about the Alo deal and killed it.
Basically used their leverage as landlord of many Alo locations. Not sure if Alo will be going to Penn Square instead.
Simon had to have been furious when OAK took Pottery Barn.
Yes, there is now a big rivalry between the two properties.
It's a big part of why OAK has been so quiet recently -- they don't want to provide advance information.
I hope Simon isn't able to dictate OAK tenants without bringing them to PSM. That only hurts OKC.
I'm sure it was a mutual agreement and perhaps PSM gave them great incentives to go to the mall instead.
The main point is that Simon has a much bigger and longer relationship with Alo and that certainly played into this.
OAK poached Pottery Barn, so there is clear competition between the two properties, not necessarily anything nefarious.
The emergence of Oak in that location is one of the best things that could have happened to PSM, for what that’s worth.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks