Anyone who thinks this building at that height would not interfere with current flight patterns should read the 37-page report (linked up-thread), which provides great detail to the contrary.
And as I keep mentioning, this was obvious back in March when Matteson filed his application. So, now we are approaching January, Matteson just said he plans to build Phase I regardless, so what on earth was the point of all this?
I'll tell you what: he is playing the Oklahoman in particular by making a big deal of this (can you ever remember any developer mentioning the FAA?) at the outset, and now, of course the paper has a huge story providing not only more publicity but great cover for when this never-remotely-plausible building is never built. Monorail!
Once again, if the supertall was going to be determined by the success of the smaller two towers, then why isn't he moving forward with the smaller ones first? Esp since those were basically locked and loaded. This whole thing is a dog and pony show and he just needs to go away.
Nothing is going to happen on this site, at least by this nut job.
Doesn't Randy Hogan have a little skin in this project ? What does he have to say about it ?
That's what you call a paradox. Supertall can't happen without the smaller towers, smaller towers can't happen without the supertall.
Obviously answer was because they were not locked and loaded. At least now we can move on past this FAA discussion and actually look for tangible evidence that the first two towers will actually happen. Guess we will see if a building permit actually gets filled by next summer.
I wish this thread didn't exist. I just can't help myself to keep coming to look at it.
Nothing is gonna happen here, I just hope it goes away quietly.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Bookmarks