Widgets Magazine
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 234567
Results 151 to 170 of 170

Thread: Classen Boulevard

  1. Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by josefromtulsa View Post
    Increasing interactions between motorists and bicyclists increases safety for all in that it causes drivers to drive more cautiously and be on the lookout for bicyclists/pedestrians, the caveat is that speeds need to be lower than 30 (which NW 23rd is but no one follows due to environmental cues making it easy to drive 35 down) If people want fast, free flowing traffic with two parking spots for every customer than they should go to Chisholm Creek. If people want a walkable, human centric neighborhood with parks and trees then you come to 23rd/Paseo.
    23rd is supposed to be a major traffic artery. You're trying to turn it into a 16th street.

    I would also disagree with your assessment that increased auto/bicycle interaction increases safety compared to my example of turning a sidestreet into an alternative-transportation-only. I would like to see unbiased support for your claim.

  2. #152

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by mugofbeer View Post
    23rd is supposed to be a major traffic artery. You're trying to turn it into a 16th street.

    I would also disagree with your assessment that increased auto/bicycle interaction increases safety compared to my example of turning a sidestreet into an alternative-transportation-only. I would like to see unbiased support for your claim.
    This section of 23rd already has the same speed limit as 16th. Both move through corridors with high pedestrian traffic. they should be designed similarly. "Turning it into 16th" just means getting people to drive the already posted speed limit, which we all want.

  3. #153

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by mugofbeer View Post
    23rd is supposed to be a major traffic artery. You're trying to turn it into a 16th street.

    I would also disagree with your assessment that increased auto/bicycle interaction increases safety compared to my example of turning a sidestreet into an alternative-transportation-only. I would like to see unbiased support for your claim.
    23rd street is supposed to be a vibrant commerical district. Youre trying to turn it into MacArthur.

    Heres some reading for you. What I said was not a personal opinion but the result of numerous studies here in the US and abroad.

    Jacobsen, P. L. (2003) Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Injury Prevention 9, 205-209 and 2004, Correction Injury Prevention, 10, 127.

    Fyhri, A., Sundfør, H. B., Bjørnskau, T., & Laureshyn, A. (2016). Safety in numbers for cyclists—Conclusions from a multidisciplinary study of seasonal change in interplay and conflicts. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 105, 124-133.

    Elvik, R., & Bjørnskau, T. (2017). Safety-in-numbers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence. Safety Science, 92, 274-282.

    Carlson, K., Murphy, B., Ermagun, A., Levinson, D. M., & Owen, A. (2018). Safety in numbers: Pedestrian and bicyclist activity and safety in Minneapolis.

  4. #154

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Why the discussion about 23rd on this thread? Inquiring minds...

  5. #155
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,999
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by Jersey Boss View Post
    Why the discussion about 23rd on this thread? Inquiring minds...
    Because it is tangentially related. LOL At least Classen crosses over 23rd. On most threads it doesn't even take that much contact to derail the thread.

  6. #156

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by mugofbeer View Post
    23rd is supposed to be a major traffic artery. You're trying to turn it into a 16th street.
    It's obviously both of these things. It was built out in the 30's as kind of a "strip". The road accommodated cars, but commercial development accommodated pedestrians.

    Once it went in decline for decades, planners just focused on the traffic arterial aspect of it.

    Now that it functions closer to how it was originally developed, that is, a walk-able strip of entertainment of dining, any changes to its structure should consider, but not favor, both of those things.

  7. Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by mugofbeer View Post
    23rd is supposed to be a major traffic artery. You're trying to turn it into a 16th street.

    I would also disagree with your assessment that increased auto/bicycle interaction increases safety compared to my example of turning a sidestreet into an alternative-transportation-only. I would like to see unbiased support for your claim.
    http://news.unm.edu/news/research-sh...-roads-for-all
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...streets-safer/
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...14140518301488
    https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoo...afer-everyone/
    https://www.greencarreports.com/news...rs-study-shows

    There are many others, but you get the gist.

  8. Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    I read your studies with interest and they bring up interesting points. First, my thoughts were primarily commuter and family joyriding-oriented, not going-out-to-restaurant/bar oriented. Second, the studies focus on intersections and neighborhoods where pedestrian/bicycle activity is significant. It focuses on densely commercialized and densely populated urban areas and intersections.

    23rd St. east of Classen lS a nice commercial district but to justify what you favor, there needs to be 1) much more commercial density, 2) much more urban residential and 3) much more pedestrian/bicycle activity than ypu currently have or likely would see for many years.

    It is common sense than if your pedestrian volume is so high there is a constant danger of a car/pedestrian fatality (such as trying to get away from Owen Stadium after an OU game or driving a car through the state fair midway) then of course automobile driver's will be more careful and drive more slowly. The reality is NW 23rd pedestrian volume is nowhere near that kind of level right now. The same is true of Classen Blvd. OKC simply needs far more urban density to justify impeding auto traffic.

    Here in Denver there absolutely ARE neighborhoods where restrictive traffic are warranted such as areas near the football stadium east to downtown, areas north of downtown, S. broadway and Colfax Avenues east and west of downtown. But central Denver is also far more densely populated than OKC. There are traffic restricted throughfares such as S. Broadway but there is little comparison between NW 23rd St. and Denver's S. Broadway. There is also little comparison between OKC and the cities in any of your studies due to density issues.

    Again, where bicycle/pedestrian numbers are consistently high, what you are talking about is common sense. I don't see that much of anywhere in OKC except parts of downtown.

  9. #159

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    I think you also have to consider that 23rd Street as currently designed doesn't even consistently move traffic in an efficient manner. Anytime a car tries to turn left onto any street from Shartel to Harvey during a busy time of the day, it's an absolute mess. Anytime a car tries to parallel park during a busy time of the day, it's an absolute mess. It's easy to see that there are ways to make this road safer for pedestrians and less frustrating for drivers.

  10. Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    I agree 23rd has excess auto traffic at many times and that only makes my point more evident. Inhibiting traffic even further there would simply create a traffic nightmare DIScouraging people from frequenting the 23rd St. businesses.

    Moving non-auto traffic to quieter, safer streets next to major traffic arteries would encourage more to use those alternative streets and transportation methods.

  11. #161

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by mugofbeer View Post
    I agree 23rd has excess auto traffic at many times and that only makes my point more evident. Inhibiting traffic even further there would simply create a traffic nightmare DIScouraging people from frequenting the 23rd St. businesses.

    Moving non-auto traffic to quieter, safer streets next to major traffic arteries would encourage more to use those alternative streets and transportation methods.
    Mug is right. It is one of the advantages of have a grid street system.

  12. #162
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,999
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by mugofbeer View Post
    I agree 23rd has excess auto traffic at many times and that only makes my point more evident. Inhibiting traffic even further there would simply create a traffic nightmare DIScouraging people from frequenting the 23rd St. businesses.

    Moving non-auto traffic to quieter, safer streets next to major traffic arteries would encourage more to use those alternative streets and transportation methods.
    So, would the businesses move with them? The businesses people want to walk to and walk past are on 23rd, not the residential streets.

  13. #163

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Can someone help me understand why the outer lanes on Classen are always falling apart as the road approaches the curb? The amount of potholes is truly impressive and it has to wreak havoc on our brand new rapid lines that are constantly driving over those potholes on the right side of the vehicle. And they always come back. As soon as one is patched, it either wears away quickly or pops up in a new spot. It's particularly bad between 36th and 44th.

  14. #164

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Because the quality of construction here is an abomination. The weather also doesn’t help.

  15. #165

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    https://www.okc.gov/Home/Components/News/News/5153/140

    OKC receives federal grant to plan for transit-oriented development along the Classen corridor
    Post Date:11/01/2024 10:06 AM
    The future of Classen Boulevard from NW 10th Street to NW 48th Street will be reimagined thanks to a $975,000 planning grant announced yesterday by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration (FTA).

    The Transit-Oriented Development Pilot grant awarded to Oklahoma City will fund a plan to encourage new transit-oriented development and affordable housing and improve pedestrian and bicyclist connections along the Classen Corridor’s Northwest Bus Rapid Transit (RAPID NW) line.

    The grant will be used to hire a consultant to develop a plan with input from residents, businesses and other stakeholders interested in the corridor.

    “Classen Boulevard is one of Oklahoma City’s most important corridors,” Ward 2 Councilperson James Cooper said. “People of all income levels live along Classen’s neighborhoods, and most of them tell me we must make Classen a Boulevard for people again – not only to move automobiles during rush hour. When GA Nichols designed Paseo as our first shopping district outside downtown in the 1920s, Anton Classen and John Shartel built streetcars to connect Classen’s neighborhoods to their basic needs, providing safe access for people to walk and bike from their homes to streetcars, connecting them to where they’re going - a concept known as transit-oriented development. With RAPID NW providing reliable transit service along this historic corridor once more and, with this grant, we’ll work with our Asian District and neighborhoods to take Classen to the next level, address our housing crisis, and honor our history by bringing this transit-oriented development vision into the 21st Century.”

    In March, City Council approved a Tax Increment Finance (TIF) District along the corridor that will provide funding for infrastructure and encourage new developments. This grant will enable the City to work closely with residents and business owners to create a vision and implement policies for the corridor's future, including how TIF and other funds can be used to ensure a vibrant area long into the future.

    “As we plan for Classen’s next decade and decades beyond, it’s important that we do so in a thoughtful, equitable way,” Planning Director Geoff Butler said. “The Classen Corridor is already a great place but has so much more potential. We are entering an exciting time for the area.”

    Transit-oriented development boosts economic development and promotes transit ridership by creating opportunities for more people to easily access bus rapid transit stations. It also increases access for people with disabilities, especially those who need public transportation to get to work.

    “RAPID NW is providing residents a new, convenient public transit option along our 9.5-mile route connecting the NW corridor to downtown OKC,” Transit Director Jesse Rush said. “This grant will help increase development opportunities along Classen Boulevard and make access to RAPID NW easier for pedestrians and cyclists.”

    ###

    Media Contact
    Kristy Yager
    (405) 297-2550
    kristy.yager@okc.gov

  16. #166

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Hopefully, painted lanes will be a part of the plan.

  17. #167

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by Teo9969 View Post
    Can someone help me understand why the outer lanes on Classen are always falling apart as the road approaches the curb? The amount of potholes is truly impressive and it has to wreak havoc on our brand new rapid lines that are constantly driving over those potholes on the right side of the vehicle. And they always come back. As soon as one is patched, it either wears away quickly or pops up in a new spot. It's particularly bad between 36th and 44th.
    There are two new massive potholes that I noticed this weekend between 36th and 40th and both in the outer lane. Unfortunately we didn't see them in time because they were filled with water.

  18. Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    This whole section of Classen needs a better material for the streets. The buses have demolished a ton of this area. It doesn't help that there is a new water break every other week. Today they are at about 38th with a massive hole that is gushing water.

  19. #169

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Whole Section from I35 to Classen on 23rd should be concrete roads, but cost. So they we go through all this weather with Asphalt that won't ever hold up.

  20. #170

    Default Re: Classen Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by gopokes88 View Post
    Whole Section from I35 to Classen on 23rd should be concrete roads, but cost. So they we go through all this weather with Asphalt that won't ever hold up.
    Do you mean 235?

    But yeah, Classen should be concrete all the way to Expressway from downtown

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Classen Boulevard
    By ljbab728 in forum Transportation
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-16-2021, 01:08 PM
  2. Replies: 44
    Last Post: 08-08-2013, 09:33 AM
  3. Classen Boulevard - Did they ever connect?
    By Lindsay Architect in forum Ask Anything About OKC
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-18-2012, 11:40 AM
  4. Name the Boulevard
    By Kerry in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 191
    Last Post: 06-07-2011, 07:14 AM
  5. Medians on Classen between NWExp. and Classen Curve
    By metro in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-07-2010, 03:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO