This is by far the most mind boggling “equation” in urban development to me. The fact that low rise buildings stood downtown for years. People lived, shopped, and worked in these buildings. Years later they are blown up and cleared to be surface lots. These lots sit empty for decades because the land is “too valuable” to build anything other than a high rise on. Makes you think the land actually isn’t as valuable as it is made out to be. This isn’t just an OKC thing, it’s every major city in America. Empty land is better than reasonable development
I always thought a good Market Hall would fit perfectly between the two parks and serve the downtown community, as well the entire city, well. Ultimate goal would be something like Markthal in Rotterdam, but there are several examples all over the US, but not just a "food hall", but something with the vision of Rockwood Market Hall in Portland:
"Rockwood Market Hall, a non-profit organization, is a welcoming open-air market in Downtown Rockwood that features micro-retail and restaurant spaces, micro-grocers, a commissary kitchen, rentable cold storage, flagship full-size restaurants, and office space. Our goal is to offer fresh, healthy food options to our community along with opportunities for entrepreneurship and vitality."
https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attracti..._Province.html
https://www.tasteofhome.com/collecti...m5NhD5nv6SBDNo
Milwaukee Public Market is a great model that would absolutely be perfect here. In this case, you having housing on top of it.
^^^^^^^^^
Meaning operating subsidy, I take it? Would make sense.
If we are going to subsidize the surrounding development, we might as well shoot for the moon and get something ike this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_District
OKC IMO should look at Edmonton's plan which is a massive $2.5 billion development. Although our city's $1 billion arena will anchor the development--we don't have the 25 acres afforded to Edmonton.
There is room for a few mixed-use developments where one could tower as high as 20 stories. This is where Pete's arena-stadium type district would come into play--especially those parking lots next to the new arena site could be home for mixed-use development.
For anyone curious, the REHCO land is 11.5 acres, not including the streets and alleys. The current arena (not including the hotel or parking garage to the east) is 13.17 acres. That about 25 acres between those two areas that happen to be across the street from each other.
Does anyone think the MR guys will build on this or is it more likely they will sell the land to a private developer who will build something on it?
Don’t forget the current Paycom site. Paycom will 100% be demolished when the new building opens. There is a ton of property in play here.
We have had the same REHCO conversation for years. If a new $1B across the street won't push them to develop something special, then what will? The REHCO site is already probably the most valuable piece of land in the whole state. And now its about to become even more valuable. Sadly, I have a feeling part of it is just going to end up being a parking garage.
I think Midtown Renaissance and REHCO are not merged at the level to be considered interchangeable in discussion. I think Midtown Renaissance is primarily Bob Howard and Mickey Clagg, with others involved at some level. I think the REHCO properties are primarily Bob Howard and the Hall family (Fred Jones companies, Hall Capital, etc.), with others involved. I think I heard that REHCO was put together as a result of the Ford Auto Collection experiment from around the year 2000, and the Halls and Howard teamed up to buy (or retain) the Fred Jones properties downtown, plus the Edmond area property that used to be Gwartney Ford, and currently houses Mercedes-Benz, Sprinter and Volvo of OKC.
I'm guessing everyone in the Thunder ownership group will want to participate in the development of the newly available space.
That's unfortunate. I loved it when the Big XII could put the men's bball tourney at Chesapeake and the women's bball tourney at Cox... could walk back and forth. Plus, OKC could get some of the bigger concerts during Thunder season, instead of them all going to the BOK in Tulsa.
The men's and women's tournaments haven't been returned here so I doubt if it was all that important to the conference and I doubt the SEC will be any different.
How many big concert dates in the last year clashed with the Thunder and made Tulsa the only option? Not many, if any at all, I would guess.
I know it has been repeated that OKC can't afford two arenas; however if we could juggle the services of Paycom Center and the new downtown Paycom Thunderdome arena--just imagine the concerts and large gatherings you could book in our city.
Wouldn't be so quick to discount Oklahoma City's chances of hosting any future SEC men and women's basketball tournaments. Don't see any evidence that OKC will be quick to demolish the current Paycom Center once the Paycom Thunderdome opens.
As beautiful as Austin is the SEC will want to have one of the schools (OU/UT) cities host an SEC event, OKC (IMO) would be better suited to host the SEC Tournaments once the new arena is built; hopefully, we'll have one more hotel added to OKC's portfolio by then.
Between now and April (end of the regular season), Paycom has 14 non-sports related performance acts booked. In the same time frame, looks like BOK has 8, maybe 10 depending on how you count the worship shows. BOK hosts a AA hockey team during that time, too.
In 2022, Paycom was in the top 40 of arena concert ticket sales according to Pollstar, hosting around 35 concerts, I think. There are arenas that have multiple major league tenants that host even more shows than that a year.
There are currently 17 users browsing this thread. (5 members and 12 guests)
Bookmarks