Widgets Magazine
Page 46 of 51 FirstFirst ... 41424344454647484950 ... LastLast
Results 1,126 to 1,150 of 1261

Thread: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

  1. #1126

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by catcherinthewry View Post
    I agree. I just think it is the Thunder management and not the City that is against a citizen's committee. The Thunder would love to push the City out of the decision making so there's no way they'd let citizens have a voice.
    Not shocking considering how rushed the vote was and no transparency.

  2. #1127

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by caaokc View Post
    Not shocking considering how rushed the vote was and no transparency.
    bUt 70% VotED f0r this

    (voter turnout was around 10%)

    I dont know why folks are surprised about the backroom aspect of this. This whole thing was a backroom deal. Same with the arena in Norman. The whole point is to make a few people even more very very rich while using public resources.

    Personally im not against land developers making money off city investments if they are actually beneficial to ALL in the community, like a commuter rail or further BRT expansions.

  3. #1128

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    The point was to keep the Thunder from greener pastures in another city.

    Bottom line was new arena or adios.

  4. #1129

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by josefromtulsa View Post
    bUt 70% VotED f0r this

    (voter turnout was around 10%)

    I dont know why folks are surprised about the backroom aspect of this. This whole thing was a backroom deal. Same with the arena in Norman. The whole point is to make a few people even more very very rich while using public resources.

    Personally im not against land developers making money off city investments if they are actually beneficial to ALL in the community, like a commuter rail or further BRT expansions.
    LOL. Screaming about voter turnout is so disingenuous. Were people against it discouraged from voting? Were all voters not given the same opportunity to vote that they are in every other election? Was the vote held at the same polling locations?

    Everyone within the city limits was given the same opportunity to vote on this and there was a ton of news coverage about it in the weeks leading up to it so unless you live under a rock, you should’ve been aware of it (but regardless being aware of elections is YOUR job as a voter). If eligible voters were so very against this, logically it would seem that they would’ve shown up to the polls to do what they could to stop it. Not voting means you’re okay with either outcome, don’t care, or that you believed it was going to go one direction or the other and decided that you didn’t need to vote on it. Regardless, if you don’t vote, your opinion doesn’t count. This passed by a massive margin for a civic vote and if people didn’t care enough to show up to vote against it…I would put money on the results of that vote accurately reflecting the opinion of most of the city.

  5. #1130

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by josefromtulsa View Post
    bUt 70% VotED f0r this

    (voter turnout was around 10%)

    I dont know why folks are surprised about the backroom aspect of this. This whole thing was a backroom deal. Same with the arena in Norman. The whole point is to make a few people even more very very rich while using public resources.

    Personally im not against land developers making money off city investments if they are actually beneficial to ALL in the community, like a commuter rail or further BRT expansions.
    lol rich people bad

    The Thunder are the best thing to happen to OKC probably ever, if some people get more rich than others on the deal then so be it.

  6. #1131

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by PhiAlpha View Post
    LOL. Screaming about voter turnout is so disingenuous. Were people against it discouraged from voting? Were all voters not given the same opportunity to vote that they are in every other election? Was the vote held at the same polling locations?

    Everyone within the city limits was given the same opportunity to vote on this and there was a ton of news coverage about it in the weeks leading up to it so unless you live under a rock, you should’ve been aware of it (but regardless being aware of elections is YOUR job as a voter). If eligible voters were so very against this, logically it would seem that they would’ve shown up to the polls to do what they could to stop it. Not voting means you’re okay with either outcome, don’t care, or that you believed it was going to go one direction or the other and decided that you didn’t need to vote on it. Regardless, if you don’t vote, your opinion doesn’t count. This passed by a massive margin for a civic vote and if people didn’t care enough to show up to vote against it…I would put money on the results of that vote accurately reflecting the opinion of most of the city.
    I don't know of anyone screaming here so you can calm down with that.

    Its very well known that voting is not an equal institution in this state and country. Not all folks have time to take out of their day to vote and this was special election in December (when folks are worried about buying their kids christmas presents) Its the same reason we have the political figures we do in this state.

    Not to mention there was a huge ad campaign behind this. Some folks had 900 million reasons to spend a few million on ad boosts. The NO campaign did not have those same special interests,

    At the end of the day the arena is getting built. But folks shouldnt be surprised when its a few select folks who make tons of money off of the development.

  7. #1132

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by josefromtulsa View Post
    I don't know of anyone screaming here so you can calm down with that.

    Its very well known that voting is not an equal institution in this state and country. Not all folks have time to take out of their day to vote and this was special election in December (when folks are worried about buying their kids christmas presents) Its the same reason we have the political figures we do in this state.

    Not to mention there was a huge ad campaign behind this. Some folks had 900 million reasons to spend a few million on ad boosts. The NO campaign did not have those same special interests,

    At the end of the day the arena is getting built. But folks shouldnt be surprised when it’s a few select folks who make tons of money off of the development.
    Sorry. *sarcastically bitching about voter turnout.

    This entire post is straight up BS if you’re trying to use it to call into question the support for this. If people were against it…enough of them would’ve voted no that it would not have passed by a whopping 71% (especially with the low turnout).

    You can have your disagreements with how any part of this was or is being handled but using voter turnout to disregard the wide/massive public support for it is ridiculous.

  8. #1133
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,556
    Blog Entries
    1

    Thunder Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Thankfully, the vote affirmation by the citizens passed and the council vote by a similar margin as well.

    Admire James Cooper, he saw that this would pass and figured out a potential way to reward his constituents interests.

    Let's see how many minority construction companies are awarded bids in the completion of the arena development.

  9. #1134

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Time to move on and discuss things happening in the present and future.

  10. #1135

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    What is the best guess for the GC for the project? Flintco built the old arena. Are Manhattan or Lingo big enough to handle this kind of project?

  11. #1136

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by Laramie View Post
    Thankfully, the vote affirmation by the citizens passed and the council vote by a similar margin as well.

    Admire James Cooper, he saw that this would pass and figured out a potential way to reward his constituents interests.

    Let's see how many minority construction companies are awarded bids in the completion of the arena development.
    I had met with James a few months into this debate last year and I mentioned the idea of the transit center to him. I am always blabbing to him about transit and sidewalks. I like to think I helped but I am sure he had already considered it as well!

    It is odd to me though that Embark just spent a lot of money renovating their transit center. I think Santa Fe would just be regional transit with the local lines being from the Transit Center.

  12. #1137

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Here is my general guess for a site layout. Three entrances and dock loading/specialty parking underneath on the north.


  13. #1138

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous. View Post
    Here is my general guess for a site layout. Three entrances and dock loading/specialty parking underneath on the north.

    I just hope leaving it up to the ownership group to develop the surrounding areas doesn't come back to bite us.

  14. #1139

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by bison34 View Post
    I just hope leaving it up to the ownership group to develop the surrounding areas doesn't come back to bite us.
    It absolutely will.

  15. #1140

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Two things can be simultaneously true: 1) You love the Thunder and appreciate the investment made by the owners; and 2) you believe there should be transparency and accountability when over $1 billion in tax dollars is being spent on an incredibly important and City-owned property.

    In fact, this is the essence of any successful public/private partnership.

  16. Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by Laramie View Post
    Thankfully, the vote affirmation by the citizens passed and the council vote by a similar margin as well.

    Admire James Cooper, he saw that this would pass and figured out a potential way to reward his constituents interests.

    Let's see how many minority construction companies are awarded bids in the completion of the arena development.
    Isn't it just going to be Flintco and all of their buddies?

  17. #1142

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by April in the Plaza View Post
    Isn't it just going to be Flintco and all of their buddies?
    Since this is a City project, any demolition or construction contracts have to go out for public bid.

  18. #1143

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Doesn't REHCO have common ownership with Thunder through Robert Howard? If so, any chance they design certain aspects of REHCO to compliment? It's about time plans are designed for this site as well.

  19. #1144
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,556
    Blog Entries
    1

    MAPS3 Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Since this is a City project, any demolition or construction contracts have to go out for public bid.
    Quote Originally Posted by April in the Plaza View Post
    Isn't it just going to be Flintco and all of their buddies?
    This is where the smaller firms who will be putting in bids will lose out; they don't have the capital to secure the lower bid.

    Recall the bidding on the Downtown Arena (Paycom Center) for $66 million 1999 bid by Flintco: https://www.oklahoman.com/story/news...s/62250076007/.

    We came up with an inferior project; remember why the NHL rejected Oklahoma City's bid in the 1997 NHL 4-team expansion derby; the NHL said that there was no way Oklahoma City could build a quality NHL spec arena for $89 million--they were correct.

    Former Mayor Ron Norrick and Clay Bennett were behind the bid that ultimately lost out to Columbus, OH who had the backing from Nationwide Insurance to build a $175 million arena in 1998, eventually opened in 2000.

    Mayor Mick Cornett made the pitch for the more lucrative NBA temporarily hosting the New Orleans Hornets (following Katrina); then owner George Shinn was so impressed with OKC he didn't want to leave and return to the Crescent City.

    Now we have an opportunity to correct the mistake we made in 1999. The original plans for the Downtown Arena was to build an arena with a basketball seating capacity of 19,599 and an 18,100 seat facility for hockey.

    Let's get it right; this time we have a billion dollars to work with.

  20. #1145
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    5,303
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by April in the Plaza View Post
    Isn't it just going to be Flintco and all of their buddies?
    Flintco still exists, but was bought out and has a parent company now. Not sure they can still be called native owned.

  21. #1146
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,556
    Blog Entries
    1

    Thunder Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)



    Flintco website: https://flintco.com/


  22. #1147

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    I'm sure you are right but simply amazing this hasn't even been discussed to date.

    I love OKC more than anyone, but all the big decisions with tax money are still made in back rooms among a handful of people. In many ways, we still operate like a small town.
    this is part of the public and signed development agreement

    PBCS&E can negotiate with the City for a ground lease to develop any unused property on the new arena site at market rate, with revenue from the lease to be used for the arena’s maintenance and improvements.
    Construction

  23. #1148

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by jdg78 View Post
    I will let the cat out of the bag…. The city isn't being transparent as I suspect the thunder ownership will own the development around the arena. Just my hunch. I am guessing a really cheap 100 year ground lease for the out parcels….
    them getting a ground lease is already public information .. in the development agreement

  24. #1149

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    ^

    And any revenue from that ground lease must go back to the arena, so effectively they will be paying rent to themselves.

  25. #1150

    Default Re: New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)

    Quote Originally Posted by josefromtulsa View Post
    I don't know of anyone screaming here so you can calm down with that.

    Its very well known that voting is not an equal institution in this state and country. Not all folks have time to take out of their day to vote and this was special election in December (when folks are worried about buying their kids christmas presents) Its the same reason we have the political figures we do in this state.

    Not to mention there was a huge ad campaign behind this. Some folks had 900 million reasons to spend a few million on ad boosts. The NO campaign did not have those same special interests,

    At the end of the day the arena is getting built. But folks shouldnt be surprised when its a few select folks who make tons of money off of the development.
    this is so LOL there is really not even a place to start ..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Cox Center Pictures
    By BrettL in forum Sports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-09-2010, 05:18 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-20-2009, 12:40 PM
  3. Cox to locate a national call center in OKC
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-26-2006, 04:03 PM
  4. Improvements to Cox Center
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-08-2006, 01:58 PM
  5. Connect the Ford Center and Cox Center
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-06-2005, 11:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO